Maybe because in this particular case, Ramona was THERE and saw with her own eyes what went on.
Then, AFTER having a "pow wow" with the dem "higher ups", it now has changed.
I don't feel that ALL situations where "more info" is found that it's always fishy.
In this case though, i think it is.
It would be like being an eye witness to a car accident, where you see with your own eyes who was driving, who rear ended who. You saw the whole thing, only feet away from it.
Then some "fancy pants" lawyer tries to tell you that the person that was in front actually backed into the other car. And you better go along with it, cause your car insurance is the same company that backs the driver who rear ended the innocent person, and you will be dropped if you don't change your story.
That's how i'm seeing this situation. You don't have to agree with me. (You can be wrong, if you want) LOL!!!