Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Ridiculous NFL players' 'union' itching for a fight 
Cold, Hard Football Facts for February 5, 2011

[img_r]http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/images/NFLPA_2-4-11_lockout_t-shirt.jpg[/img_r]We were randomly invited to some NFL Players Association party at the Sheraton Dallas on Friday. They were giving away these t-shirts that made it sound like the so-called players' "union" is gearing up for a fight. They read "Block the Lockout: Let us Play."

By the way, can we get past two ridiculous notions about the NFLPA?

One, can we get past the ridiculous notion that the NFLPA is actually a union in any legit sense of the world?

Sure, they bargain collectively. But the players also bargain individually, too, for the most money. In a real union, here's how it works: the shitty workers and the good workers all make the same amount of money. That's the deal: you trade the right to prosper individual for some collective security. The NFL simply does not work that way.

Every man is out for himself. It is NOT a union. In fact, real unions have cement shoes for guys who try to go out and cut their own deals and undermine the legitimacy of the collective power of the group.

Two, can we get past the ridiculous notion that a guy deserves a lifetime of financial security simply because he played a couple years in the NFL?

There are actually poor slob fans who make $40,000 a year who think athletes deserve a lifetime of benefits simply because they played four years in the NFL. These players are are paid to do a job. And it's not even a real job. It's a game, like a child might play on the streets, that they play as adults. And they are rewarded VERY handsomely. They know the risks. They still choose to take them. So let's quit crying over the fortunes of former football players. They have the choice not to play pro football.



Bear in mind, this article was written before the "union" decertified.
UserPostedImage
vikesrule
14 years ago


NFL owners' false labor pains 

UserPostedImage 
Washington Redskins' Daniel Snyder, Seattle Seahawks' Paul Allen and Philadelphia Eagles' Jeffrey Lurie are just three owners who can't seem to rein in their greed.
Are you the kind of person who loves hearing the bug zapper?
Who likes it when the highway paves over a few neighborhoods? Who secretly wants the tank to flatten the kid with the flower?
Then you're going to love the NFL owners in this mess....

....Locking out the players now would be unjust, unfair and as indefensible as Al Davis' wardrobe. There is so much to go around, it's obscene. A billion back? These guys have that in cash.

Malcolm Glazer, owner of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, once bought a $14 million Palm Beach mansion and never moved into it. He later sold it for $24 million.

Bud Adams, owner of the Tennessee Titans, has 10,000 head of cattle.

Jennifer Lopez, part owner of the Miami Dolphins, has offered to auction off her twins' clothes because they're not allowed to "repeat" outfits.

When's the telethon?.

Greg C.
14 years ago
That first article is kind of weird. Since when is it not a union if the workers make different amounts of money? Doesn't that happen all the time, based on experience and so on?

As for the second point, maybe I'm missing something, but I haven't heard anyone suggest that players should have a lifetime of financial security just for playing a couple of years in the NFL. I think this guy is full of crap.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
You entirely missed his point. His point was that unions normally negotiate fixed rates based on certain factors: experience, education, seniority, etc. In the NFL, however, every player negotiates his own contract and seeks to maximize his own compensation. That is not possible in a normal union. Worker compensation is bound by the terms of the CBA.
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Both articles make good points, but I disagree that it's "just a game like a child might play on the streets". Playing in the NFL takes more of a toll on your body than almost any other profession does.
This is a placeholder
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
Nice NSD. I am sick of hearing how downtrodden the owners have been to the players. I am sick of hearing how the NFLPA "had" to decertify in order to protect their rights. And yet they continue to act like a union.

Mostly, and I have said this before, it disgusts me that the players can go shopping for a judge they like. Why do Brady and Manning get to file a complaint in MN? They don't work there. They play in Boston and Indy. They only play MN once every 4 years. Brees could play MN every years and then again he may not. And the game may well be in New Orleans.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

You entirely missed his point. His point was that unions normally negotiate fixed rates based on certain factors: experience, education, seniority, etc. In the NFL, however, every player negotiates his own contract and seeks to maximize his own compensation. That is not possible in a normal union. Worker compensation is bound by the terms of the CBA.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



No, I didn't miss his point. A union is a group of workers who bargain collectively in order to gain advantages that they would not have if they bargained individually. The NFLPA bargains in order to set up certain guidelines for contracts, and then their members can negotiate within those guidelines for their individual contracts. Just because MOST unions don't work like that doesn't mean it's not a union.

This guy is just a rabble-rouser. He's not going to convince anybody of anything that they don't already believe. It's all so much hot air.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
The only two factors negotiated by the NFL CBA are the rookie and veteran minimums and the salary cap (if applicable). (Yes, the CBA also regulates how bonuses are prorated, etc., but that falls under the salary cap.) Everything else is left up to the negotiations between the player and the team. By contrast, regular unions negotiate fixed salary schedules for their workers. There is no wiggle room for individual laborers to negotiate their own salaries. A worker who tried to do that would be in violation of the terms of the CBA and probably would be expelled. He might even be sued for breach of conctract.

The author is entirely correct when he says there is a fundamental difference between the typical labor union and that of the NFL.
UserPostedImage
macbob
14 years ago
John Clayton in a Q&A session on ESPN indicated that the owners won't engage in settlement negotiations in advance of the court case unless the NFLPA says it is a union (in which case, I believe they automatically lose their court case). The union wants to be considered 'advisors', whatever that means.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=6286514 

Q: I am a corporate attorney, and I have seen (and been part of) settlement negotiations while litigation is taking its course. Why can't one or more attorneys for players (if not for the NFLPA, then for some of the named litigants) negotiate with the attorneys for the owners right now? At least in California, settlement negotiations cannot be used in trial, so I see no reason why negotiations could not be going on right now. In any event, isn't the real problem the refusal of the owners to provide full financial information?

Ed in Aladena, Calif.

A: You are 100 percent correct. Lawyers for the owners refuse to meet with the settlement attorneys for the players unless the trade association identifies itself as a union, which the players won't do at this time. The players, according to multiple sources, planned to meet with the owners March 28 and spend the week settling this mess. All that had to be done was have a short document go to federal judge Susan Nelson's court saying that the NFLPA's executive board would serve as advisors. The NFL's answer was no. This will be the only way a deal can be reached. Like you, we all wish both sides would go to the bargaining table instead of the courts.

ESPN.com wrote:

Fan Shout
dfosterf (1h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (1h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (1h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (2h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (2h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (4h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (4h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (6h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (8h) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9h) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.