warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
We know when we pick (unless we trade) and we can see who will be out of reach when it comes our turn. So I am going to list all the players being kicked around as first round candidates, who we won't have a shot at, and who's left.

I came up with 39 players being given a solid shot at being chosen in the first round or are locks. The locks have a star by their name leaving the remaining players as possibly being there when we chose at #32.

QB
*Newton
*Gabbert
Locker

RB
*Mark Ingram
Mikel Lashore

WR
*AJ Green
*Julio Jones
Torrey Smith
Jon Baldwin

TE
Kyle Rudolph

OT's
*Anthony Costanzo
*Gabe Carimi
*Tyrone Smith
*Nate Soldier
Derrick Sherrod
Ben Ijalana

G/C
*Mike Pouncy
Steve Wisniewski

DE
*Da'Quan Bowers
*Robert Quinn
*Aldon Smith
*J.J. Watt
*Camaron Jordon
*Ryan Kerrigan
*Adrian Clayborn
Cameron Haywood

DT
*Marcell Dareus
*Nick Fairley
*Corey Liuget
*Muhammad Wilerson
*Phil Taylor
Stephan Paea

3/4 OLB's
*Vonn Miller
*Akeem Ayers
*J.Houston

CB
*Patrick Peterson
*Prince Amukamura
Jimmy Smith

That's 27 players with stars by their names. Obviously any of those would be good value at #32.

That leaves Locker, Lashore, Torrey Smith, Baldwin, K. Rudolph, Derrick Sherrod, Ijalana, Wisniewski, Haywood, Paea, and, Jimmy Smith.

Ted could easily have another name higher than any of these. There could also be a run at QB with both Locker and Mallet going before we pick.

If Badwin, Sherrod, Haywood, Paea, and Ijalana or Wisniewski go I could see Ted going for somebody not listed here. With this scenario it may be better for Ted to have moved up seeing this coming or consider moving down.
"The train is leaving the station."
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
Brooks Reed at OLB? No asterisk needed.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
millertime
13 years ago
There's been talk of Akeem Ayers dropping due to less than stellar work out numbers. He's a great player that would be a steal at 32. I highly doubt he makes it that far.

I still think the best bet is to move up to the mid 20s for a shot at Carimi or Costanzo. Then we'd have our tackles of the future.
nerdmann
13 years ago
Just realized, I have four years of college eligibility remaining! Plus red shirt!
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
13 years ago
I think some other WRs might be rated higher than Jon Baldwin... like Leonard Hankerson and others...

also that seems like a lot of linemen... I'm thinking one or two of them could have a chance at dropping...

ILB Martez Wilson could be taken by someone...

Also I find the 4th and 5th CB interesting in Brandon Harris / Aaron Williams
UserPostedImage
millertime
13 years ago
The more QBs that get picked before us the better. If Gabbert, Newton, & Locker all get picked before us that means more players at positions of need will drop to us. I've also heard some talk of Kaepernick, Ponder, or Mallett going in the bottom of round 1.

Additionally, if a QB needy team doesn't get the guy they want in round 1, GB will be in prime position to trade down. For example, say Cincinatti want to go w/ Bowers at 4. They could then trade their 2nd round pick (#36 overall) and some other picks to GB for a chance to draft their QB of the future.
DakotaT
13 years ago
It sucks we aren't going to be able to use Barnett or Flynn to move up in the first round.

I wouldn't mind seeing a trade back into the second to add an additional high third - then use both thirds to trade up into the second round. It would give you 3 2nd round picks, in which you could add O-line, OLB and a WR/return man. Use the rest of the draft for project players.
UserPostedImage
RajiRoar
13 years ago

It sucks we aren't going to be able to use Barnett or Flynn to move up in the first round.

I wouldn't mind seeing a trade back into the second to add an additional high third - then use both thirds to trade up into the second round. It would give you 3 2nd round picks, in which you could add O-line, OLB and a WR/return man. Use the rest of the draft for project players.

"DakotaT" wrote:



we can't ?

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

It sucks we aren't going to be able to use Barnett or Flynn to move up in the first round.

I wouldn't mind seeing a trade back into the second to add an additional high third - then use both thirds to trade up into the second round. It would give you 3 2nd round picks, in which you could add O-line, OLB and a WR/return man. Use the rest of the draft for project players.

"RajiRoar" wrote:



we can't ?

"DakotaT" wrote:



Only if the CBA is in place. Teams cannot make a player trade unti then. They can only trade draft picks.
"The train is leaving the station."
doddpower
13 years ago

It sucks we aren't going to be able to use Barnett or Flynn to move up in the first round.

I wouldn't mind seeing a trade back into the second to add an additional high third - then use both thirds to trade up into the second round. It would give you 3 2nd round picks, in which you could add O-line, OLB and a WR/return man. Use the rest of the draft for project players.

"warhawk" wrote:



we can't ?

"RajiRoar" wrote:



Only if the CBA is in place. Teams cannot make a player trade unti then. They can only trade draft picks.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Yeah, this CBA stuff really fucks a teams strategy to take advantage of other teams lack of ability to develop players. Truly unfortunate, indeed.
Fan Shout
wpr (45m) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (9h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (15h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (16h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (23h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

4h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.