Personally... it proves just how close the margin is in this league to winning it all and sitting an watching another team win it.
That isn't anything new.. just a very solid illustration of that point, IMO.
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
How is it solid? It's not even accurate. You can't change one outcome without having a domino effect. Surely you remember playing and how winning and losing effected you, your team and how your coaches coached.
The article is 'un' solid and comes off whimsical in my view. ;)
A thorough article would have outlined the what if's for the Packers as well. This just points out that basically the Packers were 'lucky'. I strongly disagree, the game is of inches, everyone knows this and the Packers have lost by inches and won by inches.
He's only looking at one side of the coin, and only glancing at it.
"Pack93z" wrote: