Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
By the way, the author of that article makes a truly terrifying statement in the comments section following:

I think Russell could be a good player, but he is too risky to take in the top 10. If he fell to the Panthers or the Packers that would be a more appropriate place for him.

"David Lewin" wrote:



Thank goodness he didn't!
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago

By the way, the author of that article makes a truly terrifying statement in the comments section following:

I think Russell could be a good player, but he is too risky to take in the top 10. If he fell to the Panthers or the Packers that would be a more appropriate place for him.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Thank goodness he didn't!

"David Lewin" wrote:



No kidding! We would've missed out on Justin Harrell.

Thanks for the hot Russian chicks. I couldn't find them on that web page.
blank
peteralan71
13 years ago
I bet people were kicking themselves for not drafting Kurt Warner, Tom Brady, Dan Marino (1st round, but 27th pick, three later than Rodgers), etc. etc. etc.

There is a lot about the team and coaching that makes the player who they are too. A player can't go to every team and put up the exact same numbers.

Like Greg said, hindsight is 20/20.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

No kidding! We would've missed out on Justin Harrell.

"Greg C." wrote:



Thanks for the laugh, but I'm actually serious. Imagine what would have happened if the Packers had move into that season with Favre, Rodgers, and Russell on the roster. Imagine all the speculation about potential trades, etc. that we would have had to endure. Surely one or both of them would have been dangled as trade bait at some point, or we might not have had the inclination to draft Matt Flynn. Imagine all the furor from the Favre fellators. Then again, we might not have drafted Brian Brohm either, which probably wouldn't have been a bad thing.

Justin Harrell was certainly a bust, but there was no way he was going to have represented a threat to Rodgers in the way Russell could have (in this alternative universe, of course).

The babes are still there, by the way.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago
Yeah, drafting Russell would've created a weird situation, alright. I really don't think Ted would've done it, though. Even when Russell looked like he might be really good, he never looked like a West Coast Offense type of QB. Also, there would've been two first round draft picks as backup QBs--not a great thing for the salary structure.
blank
Felipe7777777
13 years ago
haha that would've have been terrible if the packers got him
blank
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

Also, there would've been two first round draft picks as backup QBs--not a great thing for the salary structure.

"Greg C." wrote:



True, although with the Packers picking 16th, the price would not have been astronomical. After being picked 24th in 2005, Aaron Rodger inked a rookie contract was worth only $7.7 million (up to $24.5 million with no doubt impossible-to-reach incentives), of which $5.4 million was guaranteed. His salary cap hit was minimal. Taken 16th a couple of years later, Justin Harrell signed a six-year contract worth around $15 million with approximately $8 million guaranteed. Russell no doubt would have commanded a quarterback premium, so it's probably not unreasonable to assume he would have received upwards of $10 million guaranteed. Again, not outlandish, but certainly not the most desirable of situations.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
13 years ago
To tell you the truth I think all these articles about 'so n so kicking themself for not drafting rodgers' are Dumb ...

Who knows if rodgers would of turned into the same person he is today if he didnt have Mike McCarthy and his QB coach and favre to model himself from ... or perhaps learn from his mistakes (INTs).

Stick him on another team that goes through coaches like a knife on hot butter ...

I do agree that rodgers has a great work eithic; but who knows a guy like that in a 'shitty' organization may have ended up frustrated and just down and out.

Put a guy like rodgers in a organization like the packers with great coaches and a great team/city/fan base and you have a great recipe.

so I might be going round robin here but ya perhaps those teams are kicking themselves for not drafting rodgers - but more then likely he would of not turned out the same under their tutelage.
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Here's another article with a similar theme. The author makes the interesting point that it was not Mike McCarthy but Mike Nolan who made the decision to go with Smith over Rodgers, citing attitudinal incompatibility as his reason for passing on Rodgers.

Peterson: 49ers fans can play fantasy football over Aaron Rodgers vs. Alex Smith and Mike McCarthy vs. Mike Nolan 

By Gary Peterson
Bay Area News Group
Posted: 01/25/2011 10:05:09 PM PST
Updated: 01/26/2011 07:25:22 AM PST

[img_r]http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site568/2011/0123/20110123__ssjm0124nfc~3_VIEWER.JPG[/img_r]Count Mel Kiper Jr. among those who like to construct parallel universes in their spare time.

In a recent post on ESPN.com, Kiper revisited the 2005 NFL draft. That, of course, was the draft in which the 49ers, holding the first pick and needing a quarterback, selected Alex Smith instead of Aaron Rodgers.

As this is written, Smith has failed the 49ers nearly as badly as they have failed him. Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers are Super Bowl-bound. It's perfect fodder for the what-if parlor trick.

What if the 49ers had drafted Rodgers instead of Smith? "It could have been a perfect marriage," Kiper wrote.

Later, in reassessing the 2005 draft with 2011 hindsight, Kiper assigns Rodgers to San Francisco and writes: "He was right nearby in Berkeley, and he likely changes everything for the 49ers."

We're using Kiper's hypothesis as a jumping-off point here, but he's hardly the first to explore this alternative reality. And he won't be the last, not with the upcoming Super Bowl beginning to blot out the sun.

But here's the problem with the what-if game -- it lacks context. It suggests events that would never have happened. For example: What if Mel Kiper had celebrated his 30th birthday by getting a crew cut? It could have been a perfect marriage.

In the case of the first pick in the 2005 draft, Rodgers ceased to be an option for the 49ers the minute they hired Mike Nolan as coach. Nolan was no-nonsense, a strong personality who didn't like to be challenged. He met with Rodgers and Smith before the draft. He caught a whiff of attitude
from Rodgers, and that was that.

Smith was chosen based on personality. He is cerebral, introspective, with a distaste for confrontation. Nolan presumed, correctly, that Smith would be low-maintenance in meeting rooms and during sideline consultations.

On the field? He was a curious fit, coming from a college program (Utah) that utilized the spread offense almost exclusively. He also was known as a guy who performed better from inside a comfort zone. The 49ers, coming off a 2-14 season, were in no position to promise a comfortable working environment.

Rodgers played in a prostyle offense at Cal. He didn't mind getting his nose bloody. He had no problems speaking his mind. Being drafted by the Packers and forced to practice the fine art of patience behind Brett Favre were the best things that could have happened to him. Just as being thrown into a disorganized state of perpetual chaos was the worst thing that could have happened to Smith.

Switch them out, and what happens? Smith does better in Green Bay than he did in San Francisco, but not as well as Rodgers has done. Rodgers does better with the 49ers than Smith did, but nowhere near as well as he has done with the Packers. Neither, we can safely guess, goes anywhere near a Super Bowl without a paid admission.

If you want to play the what-if game with the 49ers and the 2005 draft, here's where you start: What if the Yorks had hired Mike McCarthy as coach instead of Nolan?

Nolan came recommended as an accomplished defensive coordinator, having worked in that capacity for 11 seasons with four NFL teams. He had a particular appeal to the 49ers, given that his father had coached the team for eight seasons. So they hired Nolan, who in turn hired McCarthy to run the offense.

But McCarthy also was an accomplished and experienced coordinator. In his
five years at New Orleans, the Saints finished in the top half of the league in yards gained every season, finished in the top 10 twice and ranked third in 2002. And this was with Jeff Blake and Aaron Brooks at quarterback.

Was McCarthy ready to be a head coach? The Packers thought so -- after McCarthy spent one season on Nolan's staff, the Pack came calling. In five short years McCarthy has become the fifth-winningest coach in team history (with the fourth-best winning percentage). If he beats Pittsburgh a week from Sunday, they'll name a street for him in Green Bay.

Had McCarthy been hired by the 49ers in 2005 and been given a strong voice in the draft, it's easy to imagine him picking Rodgers, ready-made for the pro game and itching to get going. This is the alternate reality in which things would have turned out differently for the 49ers.

To say nothing of the Packers -- and Mel Kiper's hairline.


UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago
The thing about Mike Nolan not liking Rodgers because of his attitude was also alluded to in that article by Ann Killion that I posted a few weeks ago. I thought it was very funny, the way she summarized it:

"The younger Smith was deemed more "coachable" and pliant by the 49ers--he was willing to do a series of oddball tasks like hop on one foot without questioning why Nolan was asking him to do so (note: pliant is not a good quality in quarterbacks). Rodgers, in contrast, was viewed as cocky (note: cocky is a good quality in quarterbacks)."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/ann_killion/01/18/aaron-rodgers/index.html#ixzz1DeY4x9Sy 
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
Zero2Cool (15h) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
dfosterf (2-Jan) : Hats off to the Beast
dfosterf (2-Jan) : I'm at 71.76% in pick 'em. 2nd place. Beast is at a flat 75% 9 games ahead. That 75% has got to be unprecedented this late in the season
beast (2-Jan) : I don't care deeply, just want some good entertaining games
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : BTW, not serious.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You don't care about it either!!!!
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : NIL and Portal killed college, no one cares about it.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jan) : outside of Texas-Arizona St, it's been a snoozefest
beast (2-Jan) : I expect Georgia will change that tomorrow, but we'll have to wait and see. If they do, then only Big 10 and SEC are left.
beast (2-Jan) : So much for Conference Championship meaning something as 100% (so far) of the conference Champions lost their first playoff game.
Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Jaire had surgery, season over.
Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : I guess I need a new sig Pic. Boo
Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : Eric Dickerson approves of this decision
beast (1-Jan) : Eagles are resting RB Saquon Barkley, so there is no chance he breaks the record despite being just 101 yards from it
Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Patriots are waiving veteran pass rusher Yannick Ngakoue
beast (1-Jan) : Happy New Year's 🥳🎉
beast (31-Dec) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
beast (31-Dec) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
Mucky Tundra (31-Dec) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
Zero2Cool (31-Dec) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!
beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.