Playoff push helps Rodgers make case as game's best QB· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

Just trying to look at things objectively, and not through green and gold glasses. If it makes you feel any better I think Tramon is among the top 3 corners in the league.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

Objective my ass.

I'll go along with you and say that I don't think the Packers have the best player at any position and I'm fine with that. I do think the Packers have the best 53, top to bottom.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#12

What about the best 67? 😉

Packers_Finland
Registered

13 years ago

#13

Just trying to look at things objectively, and not through green and gold glasses. If it makes you feel any better I think Tramon is among the top 3 corners in the league.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Objective my ass.

I'll go along with you and say that I don't think the Packers have the best player at any position and I'm fine with that. I do think the Packers have the best 53, top to bottom.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

No disagreement there.

This is a placeholder

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#14

If you don't think Rodgers is the best quarterback, and consider all variables like age and mileage on the body, for whom would you trade him for? I wouldn't trade Rodgers for any QB in the league.

I don't care who the media or homer thinks is the best quarterback. Aaron's our man right now and I'm damn happy about it.

warhawk
Senior Member

13 years ago

#15

We have playmakers all over the field on both sides of the ball. I don't recall a team so deep with playmakers everywhere. It might be Rodgers, or Jennings, or Driver, or Jones, on offense or Tramon, Woodson, CM3, Collins, Raji, or, Jenkins on D.

We are flat loaded with playmakers and they are all out there on the same page right now.

That has to be very scary for anybody they play. There is nowhere to run or nowhere to hide. Game planning this team right now must be creating a lot of sleepless nights.

"The train is leaving the station."

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#16

"DakotaT" wrote:

That I will agree with... all things considered.. no one would I trade for.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

get_louder_at_lambeau
Registered

13 years ago

#17

I totally agree with you on Rodgers' statistical performance this year. It's almost identical to the output Brady had in the pre-Moss era. 28 TDs and just under 4,000 yards a season.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

But that ignores his rushing production, which was 2nd in the league to Vick. He had another 350 yards and 4 TDs rushing.

http://packersnews.net

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

#18

Who is the best QB in the league? I don't think it's Tom Brady. Last night showed yet again what a ridiculous amount of time Brady has in the pocket. He actually sits there on his heels, he's so relaxed back there. Put him behind the Packers' offensive line and his numbers would plummet. Before Randy Moss came to town, his numbers were serviceable but certainly never spectacular.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

When I think about it, the top 5 is extremely close. I'm not willing to put one over the other at this point.

Brady - 36 TDs and 4 INTs... I don't care what line you have, that's god damn impressive

Manning - Despite having a bad OL year after year, the guy produces at a near-MVP level

Rivers - If you watch Chargers games, the first thing you notice is this guy is really awesome

Brees - Had a bit of an off year, but not willing to set aside his previous efforts

Rodgers - On fire right now, but statistically didn't have a dominating regular season (the kind what you said Brady had before Moss). Has never had a "bad stretch", very impressive 3 starting seasons. Especially 2009.

Take your pick. I don't think there's a wrong choice, or a right choice.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I would put Roethlisberger in there too. That makes six. I would still put Brady at the top, but Brees and Manning had off years. It just might be that the three R's--Rodgers, Rivers, and Roethlisberger-- have moved into the top four, at least for now.

blank

GoPack1984
Member

13 years ago

#19

"Pack93z" wrote:

That I will agree with... all things considered.. no one would I trade for.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Word.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#20

lol@me for posting this same exact article.

dunce

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (4h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (5h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (11h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (12h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (19h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS