Mortfini
14 years ago
You're right and no more then 2 in the wedge
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
14 years ago

Did anyone else notice that the Falcons used a wedge of blockers on that kick return for a TD? I thought that was outlawed last season. I haven't seen a wedge since 2008. But the officials said nothing about it and neither did the announcers. Am I missing something here?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




I think they are allowed to form a wedge, but not interlock their arms like they used to in the past.

I do not know for sure.

"Greg C." wrote:



The way I remember the rule change is that it can't be more than two players in the wedge. I could be wrong though and honestly I don't remember how many people they had in this alleged wedge so I'm not going to comment definitively on whether or not it might have been illegal.

That said, what character from the team to come out after that nut shot and shove it right back down Atlanta's throat. We made a statement today. If we play like that the rest of the way no one in the NFL stands a chance against us.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Greg C.
14 years ago
I found the rule. Now I'm convinced that I am right about this, and I'm baffled that nobody except me even cares. The Falcons clearly used a four-man wedge on that return. The formation caught my eye because I hadn't seen it in an NFL game since 2008. I wonder if I could write to somebody for an explanation. This could've lost the game for us, folks:

Two Man Wedge Rule
The kicking team may not use groups of more than two players together as a "wedge" to break up the receiving team's blockers. Other members of the kicking team must be at least two yards away from any such two-man wedge.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I didn't notice this thread till just now, but you're right, the rule is no more than a two-man wedge. It would be interesting to see what response you would get to such a letter. Are you sure it was a four-man wedge and not two two-man wedges? I thought four-man wedges were always illegal and the most you could use was three men to a wedge.
UserPostedImage
Tezzy
14 years ago

I found the rule. Now I'm convinced that I am right about this, and I'm baffled that nobody except me even cares. The Falcons clearly used a four-man wedge on that return. The formation caught my eye because I hadn't seen it in an NFL game since 2008. I wonder if I could write to somebody for an explanation. This could've lost the game for us, folks:

Two Man Wedge Rule
The kicking team may not use groups of more than two players together as a "wedge" to break up the receiving team's blockers. Other members of the kicking team must be at least two yards away from any such two-man wedge.

"Greg C." wrote:



I would care if I thougt there was actually something done wrong on that play, but when i watch it I don't see anything wrong with it at all.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I found the rule. Now I'm convinced that I am right about this, and I'm baffled that nobody except me even cares. The Falcons clearly used a four-man wedge on that return. The formation caught my eye because I hadn't seen it in an NFL game since 2008. I wonder if I could write to somebody for an explanation. This could've lost the game for us, folks:

Two Man Wedge Rule
The kicking team may not use groups of more than two players together as a "wedge" to break up the receiving team's blockers. Other members of the kicking team must be at least two yards away from any such two-man wedge.

"Greg C." wrote:



I'm not good with words, being honest there, when it comes to rules, but I'm reading that's about breaking up receiving teams blockers, not forming one on the receiving team. Right?
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

I found the rule. Now I'm convinced that I am right about this, and I'm baffled that nobody except me even cares. The Falcons clearly used a four-man wedge on that return. The formation caught my eye because I hadn't seen it in an NFL game since 2008. I wonder if I could write to somebody for an explanation. This could've lost the game for us, folks:

Two Man Wedge Rule
The kicking team may not use groups of more than two players together as a "wedge" to break up the receiving team's blockers. Other members of the kicking team must be at least two yards away from any such two-man wedge.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I'm not good with words, being honest there, when it comes to rules, but I'm reading that's about breaking up receiving teams blockers, not forming one on the receiving team. Right?

"Greg C." wrote:



So maybe they're allowed to form a wedge as long as they spread out when the cover team arrives? I guess that could be the case. I'm not sure how the refs would enforce that, though. And it still leaves me wondering why until Saturday I hadn't seen this formation in the two years since the rule was implemented. At least I'm pretty sure I hadn't. Has anybody else seen that formation in the last two years?

I will watch this play more closely tonight. Usually when I get all worked up about something and nobody else cares, I turn out to be wrong, but one of these times I'm bound to be right. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile.
blank
macbob
14 years ago
Here's what NFL.com had to say about the rule at the time. Based on the article, I'd say you were correct, Greg. Question would be whether or not they were considered within 2 yards ON THE SAME PLANE:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81db42cf/Weems-returns-kick-102-yards-for-TD 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8104d93c/article/no-wedge-means-major-adjustment-for-kickoff-units 

No wedge means major adjustment for kickoff units

Special teams coaches throughout the NFL are having a particularly busy offseason.

Since league owners voted in March to outlaw the use of a blocking wedge involving three or more players on kickoff returns, the men who choreograph the organized chaos that is the kicking game have been working on and teaching alternative tactics to be used during the 2009 season.

"It's a big change," Chicago Bears special teams coach Dave Toub said.

Renowned Buffalo Bills special teams coach Bobby April said the wedge has been "the essence of the kickoff return, the point of attack. So to eliminate that part is really eliminating a big part of that particular play."

But the league's competition committee determined that too many players were being injured, either while colliding with the wedge or from being a part of it, and recommended its banishment for safety reasons. Now, having any more than two blockers within two yards of each other on the same plane in front of a kickoff returner will result in a 15-yard penalty.

The challenge facing Toub, April, and the rest of the NFL's special teams brain trust is figuring out how to do more, or at least as much, with less. Most teams had a minimum of three players closely bunched in front of the return man, forming a human plow blade (or wedge) to clear a path through the first wave of would-be tacklers. Others would use four and, in rare cases, as many as five.

For the Bills, who consistently used a three-man wedge, it wouldn't seem like such a big deal to take away one member of that group. But it is.

"The wedge is like the offensive line," April said. "For us, we have to reduce that line by 33 percent. What would happen if you reduced the offensive line in the running game by 33 percent? Or, in the case of a four-man wedge, what if you reduced it by 50 percent? You'd have a little different running game."

April and several other special-teams coaches in the NFL anticipate that there will be a noticeable decrease in average yards per kickoff return, at least during the 2009 season while clubs become acclimated with the new rule. That's a very big deal for an offensive-challenged team such as the Bills, who rely so heavily on favorable field position. Thanks in large part to strong kick returns, the Bills led the league in average drive start last season.

Back-to-the-future approach
Removing the wedge doesn't necessarily mean teams can't be successful on kickoff returns. It just requires some different strategies.

"The offseason is where we really look at it and practice some different things," Toub said. "Everybody's working on it. We have a system right now that we're practicing. We're kind of tweaking it."

Many special teams coaches expect the bulk of the league to take a back-to-the-future approach, with clubs reviving the "match return" that was popular in the mid- to late-1990s. The tactic simply had 10 blockers each matching up with 10 members of the coverage unit while the returner ran through the first opening he found rather than the zone concept of trying to outnumber would-be tacklers in a given area with three or more blockers.

"It was almost like a punt return where each blocker had a guy, he tried to hold him up, and the returner ran for daylight," April said. "I could see where people could end up doing a lot of that, because it's been a successful return in this league fairly recently."

"You're going to see more man schemes," Toub said. "Everybody will have a man. There won't be any more zone blocking with the wedge."

Don't be surprised if some clubs try taking advantage of a loophole in how the banning of the wedge will be enforced. April recently spoke with NFL director of officiating Mike Pereira, who explained that officials will watch how the blocking forms at the time the return man fields the ball and determine whether there is a violation at that point. A flag won't be thrown if only two blockers are within two yards of each other, on the same plane, in front of the returner. And it wouldn't be a violation if two additional blockers were positioned in front of the other set of two, turning the wedge into sort of a box, when the ball is caught. That is a conclusion that special teams coaches have drawn from watching a DVD that league officiating crews have been showing to coaches as examples of what will and won't be penalized.

"I think that could be something people start trying to go to," Tennessee Titans special teams coach Alan Lowry said. "It's going to be interesting."

Tougher adjustment for some teams than others
The Titans probably face the easiest transition, because their kickoff-return strategy is as varied as any in the league. They have used combinations of five, four, three, and even two blockers mostly in an effort to keep the opposition off-balance from week-to-week and return-to-return.

"Most of the time, when we went with just two, it was so that we could start right into the middle of the field and then be able to bounce one way or the other," Lowry said. "We'd tell our guys which way were going to bounce, and try to set up blocks (accordingly)."

One team that relied heavily on wedge-style returns, and could have the hardest time adjusting to the new rule, is the New York Giants. Giants frequently used a four-man wedge, and asked their kickoff returners to pretty much attack the first opening he found up the middle. The same is true with the Bears' Danieal Manning, who has done extremely well behind a three-man wedge.

So far, there are no plans to take them off kickoff returns or reduce their involvement. However, it wouldn't be a shock to see the Bears employ Devin Hester, whose free-wheeling return style makes him one of the more dangerous punt returners in the NFL, on more kickoff returns.

Bigger changes are expected to occur among the blockers that teams use.

"It'll be different type guys back there, probably a little bit more athletic," Toub said. "You'd use D-linemen or O-linemen at times, but now you can't use those guys because they've got to be able to block in space. One of those two guys is going to probably be more of an athletic type of guy because he's got to be able to block a man in space -- a linebacker, fullback type of guy."

Consequently, larger and less athletic players who are near the bottom of the depth charts at their respective positions are less likely to be activated on game day (or even make the final roster cut) than they were previously.

Another area heavily impacted by the elimination of the wedge is kickoff coverage, where adjustments also are being made.

"The coverage is going to be different," Toub said. "Before, guys would come down and say, 'OK, there's the wedge, I know where the return is going.' That freed up your mind to play fast on kickoff coverage. Now when you come down, you have a man blocking you. You don't know exactly where that point of attack is. It's kind of like covering a punt where you have a guy that's blocking you down the field on a punt return. The return can actually hit anywhere so it makes coverage a lot tougher. You have to be ready to shed your man and run to the ball."

Such maneuverability will likely be taken into account when special teams coaches choose players for kickoff coverage.

Which side will have a greater advantage, the return or coverage unit? Most special teams coaches say that, for at least one season, the edge goes to the coverage guys.

"League-wide, it's going to take all of us a little while to make adjustments," April said. "Then, in a year or so, you'll start seeing an improvement. It's an adjustment, but it's not anything that's going to radically change the beauty of the return. The excitement of the return is going to be there. It's just a little bit unknown how people will adapt and how they'll deploy their guys."

NFL.com wrote:

Greg C.
14 years ago
Okay, I just watched it again. I think it was legal. They had two guys together in the middle and one guy on each side of them, but it looked like each of the outside guys were two yards away from the ones in the middle, which is the minimum legal distance. With the camera angle, it initially looked like they were bunched up more, but on closer inspection, I don't think they were. So I will shut up about this now.
blank
Porforis
14 years ago

Okay, I just watched it again. I think it was legal. They had two guys together in the middle and one guy on each side of them, but it looked like each of the outside guys were two yards away from the ones in the middle, which is the minimum legal distance. With the camera angle, it initially looked like they were bunched up more, but on closer inspection, I don't think they were. So I will shut up about this now.

"Greg C." wrote:



Zero pointed it out already but I'll try again. The rule YOU quoted talks about the KICKING team... the KICKING team forming the wedge. There is no mention of the return team. How could this rule specifically and exclusively mentioning the KICKING team be used to penalize the RECEIVING team?
Fan Shout
beast (18h) : Colts Owner Jim Irsay has passed away
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Well, emailing should work now. After not working for almost a year. Oops.
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Brotherly Shove did not get enough votes.
Zero2Cool (20-May) : lol our email hasn't worked in months. 7 pages of unverified users
Zero2Cool (20-May) : MySpace Screaming Lord Byron ... Brett Favre.
Zero2Cool (19-May) : Packers have signed first-round pick Matthew Golden, leaving second-round tackle Anthony Belton as their only unsigned draft pick
beast (19-May) : Supposedly he has to take his image, and name off of it... but otherwise could keep selling wine if he wanted to.
Zero2Cool (19-May) : he giving up his win business?
beast (19-May) : Speaking of Woodson, sounds like he'll be a minority owner (0.1%) of the Browns
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Zero, regarding Woodson, that'd why I find the timing with Williams peculiar
dfosterf (15-May) : Ryan Hall y'all does a great job of tracking thesr
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Fear not!! I planned to do 33mi bike ride tomorrow morning, so ... yeah
Zero2Cool (15-May) : We got some dark clouds and nasty winds right bout now.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Madison they had hail 4pm.
dfosterf (15-May) : Sure looks like these tornadoes are headed towards Green Bay
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Woodson of Charles fame was reluctant and then loved it. that didn't really come out until post career
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : IE "We bought into the Bears and they let us down, we have no choice to seek alternatives"
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Or that Williams and his family are preparing an exit ramp if they don't like how things are going in a few years
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Either Williams thought it would make him look good (reluctant but then embraces the city and franchise)
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : I can only assume that the Williams camp agreed to cooperate with that article tells me 2 things
dfosterf (15-May) : Ya. They are in a great mood
Zero2Cool (15-May) : I should visit again
dfosterf (15-May) : ChiCity Sports entering freakout mode due to Caleb and his dad not wanting him to go there
Zero2Cool (15-May) : "He's looking really good out there," Derrick Ansley said of Kalen King. Adds that he's been playing inside and out.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Him saying he doesn't have one to give haha
Zero2Cool (15-May) : True, that was awesome. The whole F thing was great actually.
dfosterf (15-May) : I did like the Mark Murphy part, sorta
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Some comments on it saying it was great, amazing... I came away thinking... awkward.
dfosterf (15-May) : Packers schedule release video is "interesting" I guess.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : SOOO glad that tool still works. Saves from manually entering each game
Zero2Cool (15-May) : NFL Pick'em import was done last night.
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Atlanta with 5 primetime games lol
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Week Five BYE?? NFL is hell.
wpr (14-May) : Vikings schedule leaked. Week 12 in GB. Week 18 in MN.
wpr (14-May) : CBS has GB @ NYG Week 11 Nov 16 and they will face MN in week 18 but don't say where. I think away
Zero2Cool (14-May) : W15: Packers at Broncos
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Ben Sirmans on MarShawn Lloyd: “Everything’s full go for him.”
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Luke Butkus says training camp will allow plenty of time to implement new center Elgton Jenkins
Zero2Cool (14-May) : wk 2 commanders at packers
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Ugh. Packers thanksgiving detroit ...boring
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Panthers at Green Bay in week 9, Nov 2nd
buckeyepackfan (14-May) : Week 1
buckeyepackfan (14-May) : Packers Host Detroit Week 1! ML finally gets a week home opener.
beast (13-May) : I was kind of hoping Douglas might come back to the Pack
beast (13-May) : My question is how much do we trust Jenkins? In bad weather, he seemed to struggle a bit with ball control snapping, though he started at OG
beast (13-May) : Well Jenkins probably knows he's not getting that 2026 salary number without a new contact... so just trying to get the new contact early
Zero2Cool (13-May) : CB Rasul Douglas is visiting the #Seahawks today, per source.
dfosterf (13-May) : He's a switch and baiter. Its the same as a bait and switcher except he agreed to the switch first lol
dfosterf (13-May) : 6.8 mil raise next year. Those are existing contract numbers
dfosterf (13-May) : 12.8 plus 4.8 pro rata signing bonus is 17.6 mil. Top center in the league at 18
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

20-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

15-May / Random Babble / Martha Careful

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.