Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Another Starks thread? Why not?

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/113251949.html 

Out of necessity, coach Mike McCarthy embraced a committee approach to running the football this year.

After Ryan Grant went down with a season-ending ankle injury in Week 1, the Green Bay Packers were left without a true every-down back. They didn't have a runner who could move the pile, move the chains, handle 20 carries per game, catch the ball out of the backfield and protect Aaron Rodgers' back side.

Brandon Jackson's strengths were best suited to third down: picking up the blitz and catching the ball. John Kuhn was the short-yardage battering ram. The Packers signed Dimitri Nance as insurance on Sept. 14, but he has added little to the mix.

Waiting in the wings was a rookie sixth-round draft pick who sat out his senior season at the University of Buffalo with a shoulder injury and started his professional career on the Packers' physically unable to perform list:

James Starks.

The committee buster.

After Starks played a key role Sunday by rushing for 123 yards in Green Bay's 21-16 victory over Philadelphia in an NFC wild-card game, it would appear the committee approach has run its course.

Jackson and Kuhn still have a place in certain offensive packages, but McCarthy has found his 20-carry back.

And not a moment too soon, because the Packers (11-6) face the NFC's top-seeded team, the Atlanta Falcons (13-3), at 7 p.m. Saturday at the Georgia Dome.

"Well, he definitely deserves opportunity," McCarthy said at his news conference Monday. "He'll run the ball against Atlanta, if that's what you're asking me. Yeah, he's going to carry the ball in Atlanta. He earned that."

Starks has played extensively in just two games as a pro, and he's already set two team records.

When he rushed for 73 yards against San Francisco in his NFL debut Dec. 5, he broke the franchise record for yards by a running back in his first game. Against the Eagles, he broke the record for yards by a rookie in the postseason. The previous mark was 88 by Travis Williams on Dec. 23, 1967.

"We've known how good James was the first day he came in," said linebacker A.J. Hawk. "We weren't even wearing pads back in the spring and we knew he could do some great things."

Starks, 6 feet 2 inches, with a chiseled upper body and long legs, suffered a hamstring strain during practice May 18 and was placed on the PUP list at the start of training camp. He missed invaluable practice time and some wondered whether he'd be able to contribute anything this year.

"I didn't have doubts," Starks said. "I stayed in a positive light and prayed on it. I knew I would get blessed with an opportunity."

The week after his promising debut against the 49ers, Starks gained just 8 yards in six carries in an ugly 7-3 loss to Detroit. He was inactive the next two games and admitted he needed to develop better practice habits.

All indications are that he did just that.

"I think he really learned the last month or so how to be a professional and that this is a seven-day-a-week job and you have to practice well if you are going to play on Sunday," Rodgers said. "His practice habits have really improved in the last month and he has been re-energized."

Starks, 24, is a polite, quiet kid who breaks into a smile when reporters approach him. He never lets more than a question or two go by without repeating how grateful he is for his opportunity in Green Bay and how thankful he is for the offensive line, the fullbacks, the receivers and just about anybody who draws a paycheck from the Packers.

He also seems oblivious to pressure, doesn't over-think and so far has not made any glaring mistakes. His performance against the Eagles, in a difficult venue and with the Packers' season on the line, came in just his fourth game as a pro.

"I'm just going to do my job," Starks said. "The coaches don't ask too much of me. They just ask you to do your job. That's what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to be the best at my job."

When the Packers played the Falcons on Nov. 28, they had virtually no running game. Jackson rushed for 26 yards and Rodgers scrambled for 51. Nance was stoned on a key third-and-1 and Rodgers failed to score from the 1 on two consecutive carries, fumbling the ball away on the second.

If Starks can be half as effective against Atlanta as he was Sunday, the Falcons will have to honor play-action, and Rodgers, who threw for 344 yards in that first meeting, will have precious extra tenths of a second to scan the field.

And there is nothing like a back breaking off a 25-yard run to energize an offense.

"It really is a boost to the offense when you see a guy running his heart out," said tight end Tom Crabtree. "You want to make plays for him."

"Gary DAmato of the Journal Sentinel" wrote:


RUNNING TO DAYLIGHT
The top individual performances by Packers running backs this season:


  		Yds. 	Att. 	Avg. 	Date 		Opp.
Starks 		123 	23 	5.3 	Jan. 10 	Phil.
Jackson 	115 	10 	11.5 	Oct. 10 	Wash.
Jackson 	99 	22 	4.5 	Dec. 19 	N.E.
Starks 		73 	18 	4.1 	Dec. 5 		S.F.
Jackson 	63 	18 	3.5 	Sept. 12 	Phil.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Is Starks the missing piece in Green Bay 
Heading into Wild Card weekend in the NFL I had questions about the Packers offensive attack. Multiple weapons on the outside and a quarterback in Aaron Rodgers that should be mentioned with the other elite names in the league: Brady. Manning, Brees, etc.

But I couldnt get past the idea that the entire game plan would most likely fall into the lap of Rodgers. Tough to produce in playoff football [img_r]http://cdn.cloudfiles.mosso.com/c1910342/media_center/images/rendered/blog/wysiwyg/Starks.jpg[/img_r]when you haven to line up in empty sets on 3rd and short or inside of the 10-yard line and throw combination routes instead of playing a physical brand of football with the running game.

That changed yesterday. As I wrote in my post game notes from the Packers Wild Card win at Philly, Green Bay had that balance on offense because of running back James Starks. And we arent talking about exotic formations or window dressing here with pre-snap motion, etc. What I saw was a football team that could line up in their big personnel and win at the point of attack. That sells in the playoffs.

Starks can provide that production the Packers have missed since Ryan Grant went down with an injury. That was supposed to be Brandon Jackson, but we saw yesterday that Starks in an upgrade in talent. The Packers needed a running back that could get downhill, cutback and find open running room. Produce in the Lead Strong, Lead Open and the Power O. Basic running plays that are installed on the first day of mini-campbut are crucial to winning in the post season. Thats it. Be a part of the offensive attack and take some of the stress off of Rodgers to make every play in order to win games.

And I always go back to balanced football. Think of the Falcons offensively, or the Bears in the second half of the season. They can control the clock and move the ball on the ground. That adds to your play action route schemes and also will change the way opposing defenses game plan.

Can Starks replicate his 123-yard performance this Saturday night in Atlanta? Maybe, but we are talking about a balanced approach to play calling. Thats more important than overall numbers or yards per attempt. And it will also impact the way Atlanta prepares for Green Bay this week.

Does that make the Packers' offense more dangerous? Without a doubtbecause you have to run the ball in the playoffs. Not bad for an unknown rookie who might just be that missing piece to a long playoff run for Green Bay.

"Matt Bowen" wrote:


UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
UserPostedImage

Following along with the Starks hype.. although for me.. it is too early to say we now have balance.

That said.. he hits the hole hard and with a burst we haven't seen from another back this season.. making the offensive lines job both in run blocking and passing easier if we can continue it.

I hope to see us feed him the ball between 15 to 20 times and put pressure on the Falcon defense and allow Rodgers and the receivers skin them over the top.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
dfosterf
14 years ago
This is good stuff----The writer was head scout of the Bears

NFP- Starks 
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

James Starks was almost a Chicago Bear 
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on January 11, 2011, 7:32 PM EST


James Starks breakout game for the Packers almost never happened because he was this close to becoming a member of the Chicago Bears.

Bears G.M. Jerry Angelo confirmed to ESPNChicago.coms Michael C. Wright that the Bears called Starks to tell them they were drafting him in the sixth round. Angelo changed his mind at the last minute, instead picking Central Michigan quarterback Dan LeFevour. (Doh.)

The story came to light Tuesday from former Bears director of college scouting Greg Gabriel, who now writes for NFP. Starks was taken 12 picks later by the Packers. Angelo said that he felt bad for playing with Starks emotions, but was now happy for his success.

Angelo may feel less charitable if Starks lights up the Bears in the NFC Championship.


UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

James Starks was almost a Chicago Bear 
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on January 11, 2011, 7:32 PM EST


James Starks breakout game for the Packers almost never happened because he was this close to becoming a member of the Chicago Bears.

Bears G.M. Jerry Angelo confirmed to ESPNChicago.coms Michael C. Wright that the Bears called Starks to tell them they were drafting him in the sixth round. Angelo changed his mind at the last minute, instead picking Central Michigan quarterback Dan LeFevour. (Doh.)

The story came to light Tuesday from former Bears director of college scouting Greg Gabriel, who now writes for NFP. Starks was taken 12 picks later by the Packers. Angelo said that he felt bad for playing with Starks emotions, but was now happy for his success.

Angelo may feel less charitable if Starks lights up the Bears in the NFC Championship.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


That has got to happen. We have a moral obligation to get Starks there. It would be awsome to have him run wild over the Bears and break a long run to seal the game in the 4th.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
bozz_2006
14 years ago
I'm trying really hard to not expect another game like Philly out of Starks. I mean, we ran effectively against Philly in week 1, too. Not trying to burst anyone's bubble, but careful about expecting Starks to be the Second Coming.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
14 years ago
Chris Mortenson was on Mike and Mike just now

He asked Tom Donahoe (ex Pitts and Bills front office man) who was a sleeper..

He said Starks
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Dan LeWho? Over James Starks? That must really suck when Starks runs for 200 yards and 3 TDs against da Bears in the NFC CG.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago

UserPostedImage

Following along with the Starks hype.. although for me.. it is too early to say we now have balance.

That said.. he hits the hole hard and with a burst we haven't seen from another back this season.. making the offensive lines job both in run blocking and passing easier if we can continue it.

I hope to see us feed him the ball between 15 to 20 times and put pressure on the Falcon defense and allow Rodgers and the receivers skin them over the top.

"Pack93z" wrote:



I would like to see Starks get 35 carries this weekend. That would mean GB is up by a bunch, their running game is effective and they are working the clock.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

11-Aug / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

11-Aug / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

10-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.