Pro Bowl Roster · PACKERSHOME

Rockmolder
Honored Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

NFC Offense

Quarterback
* Michael Vick, Philadelphia
Matt Ryan, Atlanta
Drew Brees, New Orleans

Running back
* Michael Turner, Atlanta
Adrian Peterson, Minnesota
Steven Jackson, St. Louis

Fullback
* Ovie Mughelli, Atlanta

Wide receiver
* Roddy White, Atlanta
* Calvin Johnson, Detroit
DeSean Jackson, Philadelphia
Greg Jennings, Green Bay

Tight end
* Jason Witten, Dallas
Tony Gonzalez, Atlanta

Tackle
* Jason Peters, Philadelphia
* Jordan Gross, Carolina
Chad Clifton, Green Bay

Guard
* Jahri Evans, New Orleans
*Chris Snee, N.Y. Giants
Carl Nicks, New Orleans

Center
* Andre Gurode, Dallas
Shaun O'Hara, N.Y. Giants

NFC Defense

Defensive end
* Julius Peppers, Chicago
* John Abraham, Atlanta
Justin Tuck, N.Y. Giants

Interior linemen
* Ndamukong Suh, Detroit
* Jay Ratliff, Dallas
Justin Smith, San Francisco

Outside linebacker
* Clay Matthews, Green Bay
* DeMarcus Ware, Dallas
Lance Briggs, Chicago

Inside/midde linebacker
* Patrick Willis, San Francisco
Brian Urlacher, Chicago

Cornerback
* Asante Samuel, Philadelphia
* Charles Woodson, Green Bay
DeAngelo Hall, Washington

Free safety
* Nick Collins, Green Bay
Antrel Rolle, N.Y. Giants

Strong safety
* Adrian Wilson, Arizona

NFC STs

Punter
Mat McBriar, Dallas

Placekicker
David Akers, Philadelphia

Kick returner
Devin Hester, Chicago

Special teamer
Eric Weems, Atlanta

Rodgers and Tramon Williams are first alternates.

Driver, Hawk, Raji and Sitton are alternates, but not first alternates.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Kingkoopa
Registered

14 years ago

Sorry, but I'm PISSED Rodgers lost out to Matt Ryan that is BS!!!

blank

Rockmolder
Honored Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

The real snubs here, in my eyes, are Raji and Sitton. Collins didn't have to go in. Same goes for Clifton. I'd go Rodgers over Ryan as well.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

I don't know why, but I'm not surprised Ryan and Brees were over Rodgers.

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

The Pro Bowl is a joke. We know that. What comes after joke? This is absolutely awful.

None of those tackles deserve to go.

Jay Ratliff doesn't deserve to go. Raji should be in his place. I understand that Ratliff is one of the best NTs in the game, but he did not have that type of season.

LeSean McCoy should go ahead of either Jackson or Peterson. Personally, I am not so sure that McCoy shouldn't be the starting RB.

Rodgers should be in ahead of Brees. Brees has thrown way too many INTs this season.

Vernon Davis > Tony G

Andre Gurode shouldn't go. Todd McClure had a better season minus an awful snap against the Saints.

Chad Greenway had a better year than Lance Briggs.

Those safeties are the biggest joke on here. I don't think Nick Collins deserves, but putting Rolle in there is laughable. He's been awful this season.

Where is LaRon Landry? He should be recognized for the year he had.

Tramon Williams should be ahead of Charles Woodson.

Personally, Aquib Talib had a better year than DeAngelo Hall. Talib is hurt, but he should be recognized and then replaced IMO.

Normally, the representation is just bad, but it was awful this year.

http://www.row12.com/

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

Wow, Falcons have their QB, RB, FB, WR and TE.

Rockmolder
Honored Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

Want to hear the biggest joke of the Pro Bowl?... Brandon Meriweather is going for the AFC.

Shaun O'Hara played just 6 games in which he looked ok, but not great. He's going, for some reason.

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

Wow, Falcons have their QB, RB, FB, WR and TE.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

They really should have their QB, RB, FB, WR, RT, and C.

http://www.row12.com/

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

Wow, Falcons have their QB, RB, FB, WR and TE.

"porky88" wrote:

They really should have their QB, RB, FB, WR, RT, and C.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

And they really should have their QB, RB, FB, WR, TE, C, RT, LT, RG and maybe LG if he's healthy. It's debatable.

IronMan
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#10

No James Starks? Seriously? Wow.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (19h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS