dhpackr
14 years ago
that rant was just silly, and the post totally sucked!

I was focusing on special teams, and why have they played so poorly for six continuous seasons, and how the poor play of special teams has been a factor in every loss this season.

the packers have lost nearly every game by 5-6 points. the difference has been special teams in these loses.

did i say poor special teams play is one of the reasons the Packers have lost many games this season, and who is the player who is out on injury that has caused the special team to play sub par all season.

i was given a list of some crappy players that were supposed to be the reason the team has failed to play well on special teams.

I disagreed with the post on special teams players, and said these players made no impact to begin with. so they were not the key to better special teams play, it was an issue with the talent of personnel
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
dhpackr
14 years ago
the Packers cut havner! how can you include a guy how was cut as an impact player?
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

that rant was just silly, and the post totally sucked!

I was focusing on special teams, and why have they played so poorly for six continuous seasons, and how the poor play of special teams has been a factor in every loss this season.

the packers have lost nearly every game by 5-6 points. the difference has been special teams in these loses.

did i say poor special teams play is one of the reasons the Packers have lost many games this season, and who is the player who is out on injury that has caused the special team to play sub par all season.

i was given a list of some crappy players that were supposed to be the reason the team has failed to play well on special teams.

I disagreed with the post on special teams players, and said these players made no impact to begin with. so they were not the key to better special teams play, it was an issue with the talent of personnel

"dhpackr" wrote:



First of all, we have lost every game by 4 points or less. Just thought I'd put that out there.

Second of all, you don't have to make the tackle every time to be considered a special teams contributor. It's not always about making the play. It's about being disciplined and staying in your lane, so that others can make the play, and sometimes you can. Right now, we have a bunch of inexperienced players out there that hasn't been on the team very long or hasn't seen the field hardly at all.

Not many teams have one player in specific that goes down and makes a tackle every time they punt or kick it. Really it's about making the most of your opportunities, and making the play when you can.

With that said, it's hard to go out there every week with different people that you've never played with before and have success.
UserPostedImage
dhpackr
14 years ago


With that said, it's hard to go out there every week with different people that you've never played with before and have success.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



is that the excuse for this year, or every year for the last six years?
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
go.pack.go.
14 years ago


With that said, it's hard to go out there every week with different people that you've never played with before and have success.

"dhpackr" wrote:



is that the excuse for this year, or every year for the last six years?

"go.pack.go." wrote:



We've had success in the past 6 years. Remember the year we went to the NFC championship? Hell, even last year...we made it to the playoffs.

You're just too hypocritical to realize that Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson actually know what they're doing.
UserPostedImage
dhpackr
14 years ago
well to be honest...

i think ol' Mike McCarthy & Ted Thompson will win out, mAke the playoffs, win in the first round and prolly lose to ATL in the second round.

I think it will save Mike McCarthy job. i do not think gb will lose out. they played good against NE, Mike McCarthy seems to pull it all together when his back is against the wall, and keep his job.

if the Packers would just play a full 60 minute game with no turnovers or surrender any huge plays on special teams, i'd have nothing to complain about, and all will be well on PackersHome.com
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

well to be honest...

i think ol' Mike McCarthy & Ted Thompson will win out, mAke the playoffs, win in the first round and prolly lose to ATL in the second round.

I think it will save Mike McCarthy job. i do not think gb will lose out. they played good against NE, Mike McCarthy seems to pull it all together when his back is against the wall, and keep his job.

if the Packers would just play a full 60 minute game with no turnovers or surrender any huge plays on special teams, i'd have nothing to complain about, and all will be well on PackersHome.com

"dhpackr" wrote:



But you can't blame EVERYTHING on McCarthy. You honestly think he is over on the sideline saying: "Hey guys, it looks like we've got this one wrapped up. You don't have to try anymore. Don't worry about turnovers or anything."

I know, he isn't the best coach. He has his flaws, and I realize this. But I just don't think he needs to be fired. He has a good program going, and firing him would set this organization back.

And you definitely can't blame TT. He just gets the players. And IMO, he has done a good job every since he has been here.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
14 years ago

well to be honest...

i think ol' Mike McCarthy & Ted Thompson will win out, mAke the playoffs, win in the first round and prolly lose to ATL in the second round.

I think it will save Mike McCarthy job. i do not think gb will lose out. they played good against NE, Mike McCarthy seems to pull it all together when his back is against the wall, and keep his job.

if the Packers would just play a full 60 minute game with no turnovers or surrender any huge plays on special teams, i'd have nothing to complain about, and all will be well on PackersHome.com

"dhpackr" wrote:



Don't back down to these pansies! It ain't like we all don't get disgusted with Mike McCarthy and Uncle Ted. For Christ sakes we should have bought a couple O-lineman in free agency by now to fix that friggen nightmare. There's plenty wrong with what we do as a team, but overall I think McCarthey has a fine offensive mind, but he gets hung up on stuff like running on 3rd and 2 when he has a light in the pants o-line.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
A couple OL from free agency wouldn't fix our poor ass scheme being coached by someone who doesn't know the scheme well.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

well to be honest...

i think ol' Mike McCarthy & Ted Thompson will win out, mAke the playoffs, win in the first round and prolly lose to ATL in the second round.

I think it will save Mike McCarthy job. i do not think gb will lose out. they played good against NE, Mike McCarthy seems to pull it all together when his back is against the wall, and keep his job.

if the Packers would just play a full 60 minute game with no turnovers or surrender any huge plays on special teams, i'd have nothing to complain about, and all will be well on PackersHome.com

"DakotaT" wrote:



Don't back down to these pansies! It ain't like we all don't get disgusted with Mike McCarthy and Uncle Ted. For Christ sakes we should have bought a couple O-lineman in free agency by now to fix that friggen nightmare. There's plenty wrong with what we do as a team, but overall I think McCarthey has a fine offensive mind, but he gets hung up on stuff like running on 3rd and 2 when he has a light in the pants o-line.

"dhpackr" wrote:



This. We DO realize that Mike McCarthy has flaws, like I said in my last post. But what coach doesn't? He has his strengths and his weaknesses, like all others.

Same goes for old Ted.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.