Flynn did more than Rodgers did.
"go.pack.go." wrote:
As for gbpfan's comment, Flynn is not a good QB. Not to say that he never will be a good QB, but I've yet to see good, consistent play from him.
"Porforis" wrote:
Probably because this is the first time he has seen extensive playing time with the starters. Kind of hard to be consistent when you've only ever played roughly 2 or 3 quarters total in your career.
"go.pack.go." wrote:
http://www.nfl.com/players/craignall/profile?id=NAL385627 ^ Good backup.
I understand how valuable practicing and playing with starters can be, but as a backup you're still expected to come in and do what you can to help you team win. While Flynn did move the ball, he did make a critical mistake that cost our team the game. Saying "well, he's just a backup" or making other excuses for him kind of enrages me. I don't expect him to be perfect, or even average, but Flynn has yet to show me ANYTHING besides a few flashes here and there.
Good backups come off the bench, make a few mistakes, but ultimately score some points and put their team in a position to win.
Now, if you want to start arguing about how any backup could be expected to perform behind this O Line, I'll give you that. But as a general rule of thumb, you have to expect your backups to be able to be at least workable off the bench.
"Porforis" wrote: