PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

I hated the call too. Flynn had been inaccurate with his deep throws all day. It's not a choice between two yard patterns and fly patterns. They could've run any number of routes in between that would not have required an accurate deep throw by Flynn. I thought the throw on the play before, on third and one, was also too far downfield (maybe 10-15 yards, incomplete to Driver). McCarthy has done too much of that this season, usually without success.

"Greg C." wrote:



The 3rd down play wasnt' bad. It had 2 5 routes that were towards the inside of the field, then a 10 and 15 yard crosses.

I think they should have rolled him out one one to have that 1 yard QB run option.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Johnson
14 years ago

Jennings 1 on 1 with Vashar? I'll take that any day.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



With Rodgers taking the snap, yes. With a QB who has taken limited game snaps, no. Too risky and a bad gamble.
blank
Since69
14 years ago
Given the complete lack of a short-yardage running game, I can't complain about the playcall...
UserPostedImage
macbob
14 years ago
Overall, I like Mike McCarthy as a coach, and I think he's done a terrific job this year fielding a competitive team week in and week out, when injuries could have completely decimated the season. But there's usually a couple of times each game where one of his decisions makes me scratch my head. This weekend was no exception.

First was to not challenge the call of incomplete pass on Jenning's catch. To me, that was the kind of situation where throwing the flag is almost mandatory.

Yeah, I know the replays were looking inconclusive and based on the initial ones it would not have been overuled. But we hadn't used a challenge all game to that point. The score was 0-0. If we had lost the challenge, what were we going to lose? One timeout.

We still had a 2nd challenge if we needed it later. It's not like they were going to back us up 5 yards are anything like that. If the call on the field is upheld, kick the FG.

IMO, a timeout would not have been a huge loss, and the potential gain is huge. As it turns out, it would have been 7-7 going into that last drive (if overturned), and we would only have needed a FG to win, not a TD.

The second decision: Personally, I would have liked a little higher percentage play on 4th-and-1. Going for a homerun ball put the game--and likely our entire season & the playoffs--on the line on a bomb with our #1 QB sitting on the sidelines with a concussion. One yard was all we needed to get four more shots.

If it had been the 3rd down play, I would have been thumbs up. I might also have scratched my head a little less if it had been Aaron Rodgers back there, but it was Flynn.

I know a backup is expected to be ready to play at a moments notice, but I doubt he had the same amount of reps as Aaron Rodgers throwing that route to Jennings.

In any event, I like Mike McCarthy, but wish he'd reduce these number of head scratching moments.
Chutzpah515
14 years ago
MM real blunder was the run on 2nd and 2. Why is McCarthy so afraid to commit to his own running game? Three shots to gain two yards RUN THE BALL!

Calling a timeout after you shredded the Lions defense on three consecutive pass plays was puzzling to me too.

That play-action dump out of the "I" to Quarless, which had been working well the entire game, would have been my choice on second down.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago

Overall, I like Mike McCarthy as a coach, and I think he's done a terrific job this year fielding a competitive team week in and week out, when injuries could have completely decimated the season. But there's usually a couple of times each game where one of his decisions makes me scratch my head. This weekend was no exception.

First was to not challenge the call of incomplete pass on Jenning's catch. To me, that was the kind of situation where throwing the flag is almost mandatory.

Yeah, I know the replays were looking inconclusive and based on the initial ones it would not have been overuled. But we hadn't used a challenge all game to that point. The score was 0-0. If we had lost the challenge, what were we going to lose? One timeout.

We still had a 2nd challenge if we needed it later. It's not like they were going to back us up 5 yards are anything like that. If the call on the field is upheld, kick the FG.

IMO, a timeout would not have been a huge loss, and the potential gain is huge. As it turns out, it would have been 7-7 going into that last drive (if overturned), and we would only have needed a FG to win, not a TD.

The second decision: Personally, I would have liked a little higher percentage play on 4th-and-1. Going for a homerun ball put the game--and likely our entire season & the playoffs--on the line on a bomb with our #1 QB sitting on the sidelines with a concussion. One yard was all we needed to get four more shots.

If it had been the 3rd down play, I would have been thumbs up. I might also have scratched my head a little less if it had been Aaron Rodgers back there, but it was Flynn.

I know a backup is expected to be ready to play at a moments notice, but I doubt he had the same amount of reps as Aaron Rodgers throwing that route to Jennings.

In any event, I like Mike McCarthy, but wish he'd reduce these number of head scratching moments.

"macbob" wrote:



Good post +1. I agree with you for the most part. As fans we only focus on the negatives but McCarthy has done a lot of positive things for this team.
gbguy20
14 years ago
would any of u be complaining had that been a touchdown?
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Pack93z
14 years ago

would any of u be complaining had that been a touchdown?

"gbguy20" wrote:



Nope.

If he is not aggressive there.. he is damned.

If he is aggressive he is damned.

Unless either is successful.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Stevetarded
14 years ago

would any of u be complaining had that been a touchdown?

"pack93z" wrote:



Nope.

If he is not aggressive there.. he is damned.

If he is aggressive he is damned.

Unless either is successful.

"gbguy20" wrote:



If they try a short pass or a run nobody is going to say "Dang McCarthy should have taken a shot at the end zone".
blank
Pack93z
14 years ago


If they try a short pass or a run nobody is going to say "Dang McCarthy should have taken a shot at the end zone".

"Stevetarded" wrote:



Really.. if he runs and doesn't make it.. one can say damn it why not throw it short.. we are a passing team.

If he throws it short.. one can say damn it.. one yard.. man up and run the damn ball.

We can play this game all day long. lol.

But he went for the game.. on a short yardage play when more than likely the Lions aren't looking for it. It was a gamble.. but I sure in the hell won't complain because he went for the game.

But we can say he should have ran a ton of different calls.. but I think the lack in trust in Flynn, reading and checking down in progressions made the call a single route.. a single read to your big money WR.. it was a risk no doubt.

But not worth getting wound up about.

We can do that over the lack of effective running and not helping Flynn nor Rodgers out for the remainder of the 58 of the game.

Be pissed about that.. a one dimensional offense that sooner or later is going to be stopped. That is what I will hold their feet to the fire upon.. not one shot late in the game.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (34m) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (1h) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (21h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (21h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.