Simple PackersHome Question.· Page 3

Pack93z
Select Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#21

Rourke's my real name. I'm the only Rourke on Facebook, so it's easy to find me if you want. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

The whole hiding comment was a play on the preferences smack down that Zero laid down.

"pack93z" wrote:

Wha?? :crazy:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Refresher to dis-spell the crazy tag. ;)

Zero2Cool:20-Nov-2010 21:25:55
Kudo's module needs some heavy coding yet to intergrate it. I'll be coding out the ability for one to hide their online status as well. That annoys the piss out of me. 278 people had the nerve to hide their status. Something that's bothered me about a FORUM. It's not enough we hide behind a screen name, but one has to hide the online status of said screen name? No reason for it.

"pack93z" wrote:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I'm not senile, I know what I said. I'm saying "Wha?" to how the heck it mixes in with this?

I know this is a bit complex.. but NS stated he wasn't hiding with the facebook comment.. in return I mentioned that was not the reference of my above post referring to him hiding behind his screen name... this was the reference.

My dry humor..

Interesting timing for a question of this nature.

"pack93z" wrote:

Actually a single post drew the question..

Buy her a one-way ticket my way. I'll convert her.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

So I thought.. what the hell.. lets see what the members think, some that hide behind their screen name.. and some that don't. ;)

BTW.

I would vote Rourke.. just not sure if it is actual or pseudo in nature. :lol:

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#22

I said something about the online status, not hiding behind ones screen name.

I'm leaning towards me being stupid and not understanding the connection, but it seems like you're reaching hard to throw that back in my face. Guess I'm a prune, I don't see the humor in that. More annoying that something petty keeps getting thrown in my face without justifying the need for it.

Pack93z
Select Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#23

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I am not stretching to throw anything in your face... sorry but I am not.

Your comment here..

It's not enough we hide behind a screen name, but one has to hide the online status of said screen name? No reason for it.

How is that not interpreted as hiding behind your screen name?

I made a simple comment the other day about my online status being changed.. responded with this.

So I simply tried to make light of the scolding.. by mentioning it again.. not to put you down but more in a volley back.

Sorry.. failed humor attempt I guess.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#24

Oh, I did come off like an asshole there. My fault. I remember saying that, I was thinking "wonder how people would talk in person if they weren't hidden behind a screen name?" ... didn't curb that thought when I seen 278 or something people hiding their online status.

I never understood that and no ones ever explained why it was necessary. I remember when we had a staff, two or three of ya chumps were hiding your online status!! :shakes fist:

djcubez
Senior Member

14 years ago

#25

Who's the person with the biggest ego here? Probably the person that thinks that everyone thinks that he has the biggest ego:

Based on the miss-perceptive comments from others I'm gonna say the perception is myself. I could probably point to three or four factors into that perception as well. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

lol.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (16h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (16h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Rude!

beast (21h) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22