dhpackr
14 years ago


Awful's a bit strong no? He had 295 yards PASSING and 2 TDs and finished with a passer rating of 84.3 He wasn't at his best for sure, but he was way better than awful.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:



& 2 INTS in the red zone. he was off on so many throws, he looked unprepared for the game.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Cal2GreenBay
14 years ago




p.s. Not suprised at all by the Favre/Sterger stuff. I posted years back that I saw Favre at the ProBowl and the Sterger stuff just validates what I already knew. I rest my case on that.

All of his flaws at out in the open to see.

I'm just glad we have #12 now.

"blueleopard" wrote:



What did you see Favre doing? And the last time Brett actually made a trip to Aloha Stadium was in the 90's.

"Cal2GreenBay" wrote:



Just sent you a PM
blank
Rios39
14 years ago


Awful's a bit strong no? He had 295 yards PASSING and 2 TDs and finished with a passer rating of 84.3 He wasn't at his best for sure, but he was way better than awful.

"dhpackr" wrote:



& 2 INTS in the red zone. he was off on so many throws, he looked unprepared for the game.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:



He looked good. Made 2 bad plays but he could move the ball at will He made a possible risk to jennings but that pick was more bad luck then anything cause it got tipped. The one to Allen he took his eyes off the screen.

Rodgers and the receivers need to get their adjusted routes fixed though.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago


Those passes weren't throwaways, they were fuckups and missed opportunities.

"yooperfan" wrote:



Regardless, they weren't sacks and they weren't interceptions.


16 29 	212 	55.2 	7.3  1  3

21 34 	295 	61.8 	8.7  2   2

Which numbers would you rather have?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Which numbers would you rather have?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Number, W.
UserPostedImage
Cal2GreenBay
14 years ago
Unrelated but partially related.

Can someone tell me why my private messages are stuck in my outbox?
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Which numbers would you rather have?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Number, W.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Not my point.

Aaron played a good game, and it was good enough for the win. Yet fans are still complaining that he could have completed four or five more passes.

My point - I don't care. I'd much rather he got rid of them, missed opportunities or throwaways irrelevant, than take a sack or throw it in an area that could be intercepted by a defender.

Aaron played one of the most significant games of his career. He got the monkey off his back. Yet, we're still finding things to complain about.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
14 years ago

Unrelated but partially related.

Can someone tell me why my private messages are stuck in my outbox?

"Cal2GreenBay" wrote:



They aren't stuck.. they sit in the outbox until the intended reader opens it.. then it moves to sent. Not quite like e-mail.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
TOPackerFan
14 years ago


Awful's a bit strong no? He had 295 yards PASSING and 2 TDs and finished with a passer rating of 84.3 He wasn't at his best for sure, but he was way better than awful.

"dhpackr" wrote:



& 2 INTS in the red zone. he was off on so many throws, he looked unprepared for the game.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:



Actually one INT in the red zone.

He wasn't great for sure, but I don't think you can put all of the missed throws on Aaron (maybe half). I'd also bet there are lots of teams that would like to have an "off" QB that puts up the kind of numbers Aaron did last night on one of his "on" days.
Show me a good loser, I'll show you a loser - Vince
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Not my point.

Aaron played a good game, and it was good enough for the win. Yet fans are still complaining that he could have completed four or five more passes.

My point - I don't care. I'd much rather he got rid of them, missed opportunities or throwaways irrelevant, than take a sack or throw it in an area that could be intercepted by a defender.

Aaron played one of the most significant games of his career. He got the monkey off his back. Yet, we're still finding things to complain about.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Not my point. I care about W's, not stats. I don't care much about the numbers at this stage. IF we show consistent winning, then I'll worry a little about stats.

To your point, the incompletions didn't hurt us, we won the game. I think some fans expect Rodgers to be spot on, every game, all game. Expectations are unrealistically high and its kind of sad.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.