Oh revenge and justice is so sweet.· Page 2

dhpackr
Registered

14 years ago

Awful's a bit strong no? He had 295 yards PASSING and 2 TDs and finished with a passer rating of 84.3 He wasn't at his best for sure, but he was way better than awful.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:

& 2 INTS in the red zone. he was off on so many throws, he looked unprepared for the game.

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

Cal2GreenBay
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

#12

p.s. Not suprised at all by the Favre/Sterger stuff. I posted years back that I saw Favre at the ProBowl and the Sterger stuff just validates what I already knew. I rest my case on that.

All of his flaws at out in the open to see.

I'm just glad we have #12 now.

"blueleopard" wrote:

What did you see Favre doing? And the last time Brett actually made a trip to Aloha Stadium was in the 90's.

"Cal2GreenBay" wrote:

Just sent you a PM

blank

Rios39
Member

14 years ago

#13

Awful's a bit strong no? He had 295 yards PASSING and 2 TDs and finished with a passer rating of 84.3 He wasn't at his best for sure, but he was way better than awful.

"dhpackr" wrote:

& 2 INTS in the red zone. he was off on so many throws, he looked unprepared for the game.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:

He looked good. Made 2 bad plays but he could move the ball at will He made a possible risk to jennings but that pick was more bad luck then anything cause it got tipped. The one to Allen he took his eyes off the screen.

Rodgers and the receivers need to get their adjusted routes fixed though.

blank

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#14

Those passes weren't throwaways, they were fuckups and missed opportunities.

"yooperfan" wrote:

Regardless, they weren't sacks and they weren't interceptions.


16 29 	212 	55.2 	7.3  1  3

21 34 	295 	61.8 	8.7  2   2

Which numbers would you rather have?

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#15

Which numbers would you rather have?

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Number, W.

Cal2GreenBay
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

#16

Unrelated but partially related.

Can someone tell me why my private messages are stuck in my outbox?

blank

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#17

Which numbers would you rather have?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Number, W.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Not my point.

Aaron played a good game, and it was good enough for the win. Yet fans are still complaining that he could have completed four or five more passes.

My point - I don't care. I'd much rather he got rid of them, missed opportunities or throwaways irrelevant, than take a sack or throw it in an area that could be intercepted by a defender.

Aaron played one of the most significant games of his career. He got the monkey off his back. Yet, we're still finding things to complain about.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#18

Unrelated but partially related.

Can someone tell me why my private messages are stuck in my outbox?

"Cal2GreenBay" wrote:

They aren't stuck.. they sit in the outbox until the intended reader opens it.. then it moves to sent. Not quite like e-mail.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

TOPackerFan
Registered

14 years ago

#19

Awful's a bit strong no? He had 295 yards PASSING and 2 TDs and finished with a passer rating of 84.3 He wasn't at his best for sure, but he was way better than awful.

"dhpackr" wrote:

& 2 INTS in the red zone. he was off on so many throws, he looked unprepared for the game.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:

Actually one INT in the red zone.

He wasn't great for sure, but I don't think you can put all of the missed throws on Aaron (maybe half). I'd also bet there are lots of teams that would like to have an "off" QB that puts up the kind of numbers Aaron did last night on one of his "on" days.

Show me a good loser, I'll show you a loser - Vince

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#20

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Not my point. I care about W's, not stats. I don't care much about the numbers at this stage. IF we show consistent winning, then I'll worry a little about stats.

To your point, the incompletions didn't hurt us, we won the game. I think some fans expect Rodgers to be spot on, every game, all game. Expectations are unrealistically high and its kind of sad.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (7h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (7h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (9h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (9h) : Packers will get in

beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS