A luck escape?· Page 3

djcubez
Senior Member

14 years ago

But by the rules that should have been a 15 yd flag, I wonder if this will be explained why it wasn't. He took it off not like someone else did it. Just another thanks to the refs 🙂 I am sure our o-line was mugging the Vikes also but of course noone will admit to that.

To me we got a gift from the refs and that was that.

"dhazer" wrote:

And by the rules mugging a defensive player in the face should be illegal hands to the face. Grabbing the facemask should be a facemask. The refs would have looked bad calling this one if the reason for him taking off his helmet was a penalty by Matthews' blocker.

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#22

It wasn't on the facemask play...he disenganged from the line and was running to the middle of the field to chase down the play.

It appeared that his helmet was sliding off/blocking his vision...but he was still lucky to get away with a penalty. Though I'll admit, it looked pretty bad ass having him whip that thing off and chase down the play :thumbleft:

"Rockmolder" wrote:

It wasn't on THAT facemask play, but he got chokeholded and facemasked multiple times, so it could've been a possibility that that was the reason for his helmet blocking his vision.

Like I said, more speculation than anything else.

"musccy" wrote:

Loadholt held him more than he blocked him.

The refs let the teams play football though. They didn't call much against either side unless it was obvious, which I felt some holds and facemasks were on Matthews. He was definitely fed up by the non calls.

http://www.row12.com/

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

#23

"porky88" wrote:

"Rockmolder" wrote:

"musccy" wrote:

Yup.

Because, let's be honest here, Bulaga got away with some stuff, as well. I think I saw him do as much as taking Edwards in a chokehold on one play and it didn't get called.

Johnson
Registered

14 years ago

#24

Just wondering could som1 clear up the 2end 30 play cm3 spears to pull his helmet off while the play is still going on could havebeen a automatic 1st down

"Mortfini" wrote:

Huh? Speak English!

blank

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#25

There were other missed calls. The one where the Aaron Rodgers pass was tipped and intercepted in the endzone SHOULD have been pass interference on the Queens before the ball got there. But no call.

gbpfan
Registered

14 years ago

#26

as i see it cm was held numerous times,hands to the face a lot and when you can see that on t.v and I'm not saying bulaga didnt hold but dint see multiple face mask holds,and when he threw off his helmet i belive it was because he the vikes player pulled half way off that's why he just took all the way off,and still went on with the paly.

dhazer
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#27

Removing Helmets on the Field During Play -- no player may remove his helmet while on the playing field. Doing so will result in a 15-yard Unsportsmanlike Conduct penalty. Exceptions are during timeouts and between quarters. (The NFL has done this in an effort to "reduce taunting and overexuberant celebrations" and also "in the name of safety.

I'm just saying it was obvious and should have been 15 yds. You stoop to calling me names because I answered the guys question so be it

Little side note NFL says that the ref was wrong by overturning the vikes td.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

mi_keys
Senior Member

14 years ago

#28

"dhazer" wrote:

Clearly they didn't see it, just like the countless times they didn't call holding/facemask on whoever was blocking Matthews, the illegal contact on Walker on their second interception, the couple times we got away with holding. They let a lot of stuff go on both sides. It literally took someone decleating Matthews by his facemask for them to call it.

Born and bred a cheesehead

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#29

The rule about not taking off helmets has always been aimed at on-field celebrations, not at players taking their helmets off during plays, which is a rare occurrence for obvious reasons. In the past couple years, the NFL has dropped its emphasis on the rule, probably as a result of some penalties that occurred when players had their helmets knocked off accidentally. So the no-call on Matthews was not a surprise. And at least it gives dhazer another reason to claim that the Packers did not deserve to beat his hero.

blank

dhazer
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#30

I say FUCK OFF to all you guys. I answer the guys question, you know the one that started this thread dumbasses. I'm sure if Jared Allen did it you assholes would be crying because you can't see things outside of of the green and gold glasses.
You guys want me to go back to being a dick i will, doesn't bother me one bit.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (13m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (24m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS