Someone explain this bs!· Page 2

bigfog
Registered

14 years ago

We have been in them all if all 53 players are healthy we're 6-0 no doubt./quote]

53 Players + 2009 Rodgers = 6-0

Rodgers has been terrible this year.

"Chutzpah515" wrote:

Poor offensive line play has a lot to do with this. I guess Rodgers has had just about enough of that crap. Combine that with the lack of calls when defenders lay him out, and hell yeah, I'd probably have happy feet too.

Guy is getting killed back there

"I wouldn't root for the Minnesota Vikings to win a chess match against Nazi Germany."

Timmons
Registered

14 years ago

#12

We have been in them all if all 53 players are healthy we're 6-0 no doubt./quote]

53 Players + 2009 Rodgers = 6-0

Rodgers has been terrible this year.

"bigfog" wrote:

"Chutzpah515" wrote:

I agree with this, yet would like to point out that last year we set a team record on sacks given up. So it isn't like we should some how expect better pass protection.

blank

Since69
Registered

14 years ago

#13

I agree with this, yet would like to point out that last year we set a team record on sacks given up. So it isn't like we should some how expect better pass protection.

"Timmons" wrote:

Nonsense. We didn't change players, coaches or scheme. Why shouldn't we get better results? </sarcasm>

Bottom line is that injuries happen every year to every team - we've just been hit especially hard. Hats off to the team for not folding up their tents and quitting.

Jon305
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

#14

I don't know of any team that has had this level of injuries and won. Everybody can be all PC and say, "Injuries Dont matter" but the truth is they do. That type of statement is something I would expect from McCarthy or Ted at a press conference.

Backups are backups for a reason. They are not as good. When you lose a starter, sure you can hope that the backup steps up, and the others on the field rally and compensate for that injury. When you lose the 2nd, you now have 1 less starter to rally around the now 2 injured players. Every time you add an injured the task is harder. At somepoint, it is no longer possible to overcome.

I have still be fairly satisfied with the Defense. They are doing what they can, but the injuries have mounted to where they are to much. Get Matthews and Pickett back, get Bigby and Harris from PUP, and they have a good chance again. But as it was last 2 games. I just to much.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

Amen

blank

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#15

What can you do? You are allowed 53 players, and only so much money to spend. When your 1st and 2nd stringers go down, you're pretty much screwed.
Aaron Rodgers hasn't had enough time to FIND an open guy. He's getting killed. I doubt he will make it through the season. Give him the amount of time Henne had, and he'd put up 5 TD's a game.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#16

Someone please tell me why the hell we have to be so injured? We have had a chance to win all of our games. We have been in them all if all 53 players are healthy we're 6-0 no doubt.

But the real question is when is the last time any team has seen this kind of misfortune on their team? I wanna know cause if they overcame it then im hoping we can

"nerdmann" wrote:

2008. But it's not the injuries that have cost us these games.

"Jon305" wrote:

It's getting real old that you're blaming the coaches in EVERY thread.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS