Finley88Beast
14 years ago
This is the thing we have to overcome and really the thing is all we need to do is set up the pass that's all.I mean we do not need Jackson to break out big runs like AP to have a good running game.To this sense im having we need to have a little more carries even if the running game isn't working.We need to be closer to balanced than pass pass pass pass run pass pass etc. etc. you get my drift.I would like to see at least 15 carries a week by Jackson.The thing that bothered me was that they started using kuhn on the first snaps of the game.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
TengoJuego
14 years ago
It'd be interesting to see how Starks is doing, right now. How has his rehab been?

Would make for a great story, for him to come in week 6 or 7 and run wild ala 2007 Ryan Grant. But that's all a fantasy, most likely.
millertime
14 years ago
The thing that was great about Ryan Grant was that the guy NEVER got tackled for a loss. He might not have been a great receiving back, but he always gain positive yards.

Jackson routinely got stopped behind the LOS last night, setting up longer 2nd and 3rd downs for the offense. Kuhn will never be a threat to break a long run. That is why we struggled last night.
millertime
14 years ago

It'd be interesting to see how Starks is doing, right now. How has his rehab been?

Would make for a great story, for him to come in week 6 or 7 and run wild ala 2007 Ryan Grant. But that's all a fantasy, most likely.

"TengoJuego" wrote:



You'd think, but the same thing happened with Gado as well. RB is the one position where relative unknowns can really shine most frequently.
Chutzpah515
14 years ago

The thing that was great about Ryan Grant was that the guy NEVER got tackled for a loss. He might not have been a great receiving back, but he always gain positive yards.

Jackson routinely got stopped behind the LOS last night, setting up longer 2nd and 3rd downs for the offense. Kuhn will never be a threat to break a long run. That is why we struggled last night.

"millertime" wrote:



yeah he always made sure he was tackled for no gain.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
14 years ago
The Bears run defense is incredible this year. I rate it slightly above the Steelers as best in the NFL. We don't have a good run blocking run line as it stands either.

The pass WAS working for us last night. Jones forgot to switch hands and protect the ball, and several vets forgot to put on their big boy pants.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
zombieslayer
14 years ago

This is the thing we have to overcome and really the thing is all we need to do is set up the pass that's all.I mean we do not need Jackson to break out big runs like AP to have a good running game.To this sense im having we need to have a little more carries even if the running game isn't working.We need to be closer to balanced than pass pass pass pass run pass pass etc. etc. you get my drift.I would like to see at least 15 carries a week by Jackson.The thing that bothered me was that they started using kuhn on the first snaps of the game.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I'd rather see more screens to Jackson than carries. He gets tackled for a loss.

Kuhn's good for pounding for a few yards and making defenders hurt afterward.

I'm perfectly fine with 70% pass/30% rush. Balance is silly nowadays that the rules have changed to make passing so favorable.

Our O is fine. Take away those penalties and we wouldn't be having this discussion. Let's not forget about all the big plays we had that got called back due to penalties. We'd be talking about a completely different game and everyone will be saying how awesome our O is.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Chutzpah515
14 years ago

This is the thing we have to overcome and really the thing is all we need to do is set up the pass that's all.I mean we do not need Jackson to break out big runs like AP to have a good running game.To this sense im having we need to have a little more carries even if the running game isn't working.We need to be closer to balanced than pass pass pass pass run pass pass etc. etc. you get my drift.I would like to see at least 15 carries a week by Jackson.The thing that bothered me was that they started using kuhn on the first snaps of the game.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I'd rather see more screens to Jackson than carries. He gets tackled for a loss.

Kuhn's good for pounding for a few yards and making defenders hurt afterward.

I'm perfectly fine with 70% pass/30% rush. Balance is silly nowadays that the rules have changed to make passing so favorable.

Our O is fine. Take away those penalties and we wouldn't be having this discussion. Let's not forget about all the big plays we had that got called back due to penalties. We'd be talking about a completely different game and everyone will be saying how awesome our O is.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



i was surpised they didn't run any screens period last night
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
14 years ago
I just don't get all of the people complaining who expected us to have an established running game last night vs a team that has given up 1.0 and 1.8 ypc in their 2 other games this year.

Top if off with the fact that they have a bad pass defense and we have a very good pass offense.
blank
porky88
14 years ago

...We will not be a SuperBowl Caliber team. IMHO no team has ever won the Super Bowl without a well balanced running/passing game and right now we have no running game, nor will Mike McCarthy alllow one to develop. I am not sure what it is with this guy, but every season it's the same M.O.
with him.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



New Orleans Saints 2009.

"twebdonny" wrote:



Actually, they had a top ten running offense. Not nearly as bad as people think in that department.
http://www.row12.com/ 
reggie
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
    wpr (9-Apr) : yay
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
    Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
    Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    10 - 22
    Recent Topics
    17h / Random Babble / wpr

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.