Heatherthepackgirl
16 years ago
I knew he had a nice house in Mississippi, but you dont see him with bling, dressed to the 9's, he is an everyday kind of guy. And really if we all had money we would have bigger things as well. You dont see him taking lavish vacations, he goes once a year to Disney Land in FL, as far as I know.

If I was moving to Green Bay I would buy that house, has to be cool for who ever buys it knowing Brett and family lived there. πŸ™‚
Heathiee
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I'm willing to bet the size of the house is direct relation to his wifes wants, not his.
UserPostedImage
Heatherthepackgirl
16 years ago

I'm willing to bet the size of the house is direct relation to his wifes wants, not his.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




This could be Zero, never thought of it that way. But they do need a bigger house with all the family there that comes and goes. I wonder if Brett's Mom lives with them in Mississippi as well.
Heathiee
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

I'm willing to bet the size of the house is direct relation to his wifes wants, not his.

"Heatherthepackgirl" wrote:




This could be Zero, never thought of it that way. But they do need a bigger house with all the family there that comes and goes. I wonder if Brett's Mom lives with them in Mississippi as well.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



A bigger house yes, a 390 bedroom house? No.


I blame the woman for it!! πŸ™‚
UserPostedImage
Heatherthepackgirl
16 years ago

I'm willing to bet the size of the house is direct relation to his wifes wants, not his.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




This could be Zero, never thought of it that way. But they do need a bigger house with all the family there that comes and goes. I wonder if Brett's Mom lives with them in Mississippi as well.

"Heatherthepackgirl" wrote:



A bigger house yes, a 390 bedroom house? No.


I blame the woman for it!! :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Us woman always get the blame.. LOL.. πŸ™‚
Heathiee
greenwhiteandnogold
16 years ago

Traitor!

Real Packer fans would "stone him", or at least, not buy his house. :pottytrain2:

"Roddyboy" wrote:



Sarcasm right...

Hey Teddy Tossers, I bet you're loving this! Out with Favre, he didn't do anything for GB anyways (more sarcasm)
blank
Rios39
16 years ago

Traitor!

Real Packer fans would "stone him", or at least, not buy his house. :pottytrain2:

"greenwhiteandnogold" wrote:



Sarcasm right...

Hey Teddy Tossers, I bet you're loving this! Out with Favre, he didn't do anything for GB anyways (more sarcasm)

"Roddyboy" wrote:



I'm really disappointed in GB Packer fans. Ya lets build a team around a 40 year old QB. That's REAL smart.
blank
Heatherthepackgirl
16 years ago

Traitor!

Real Packer fans would "stone him", or at least, not buy his house. :pottytrain2:

"Rios39" wrote:



Sarcasm right...

Hey Teddy Tossers, I bet you're loving this! Out with Favre, he didn't do anything for GB anyways (more sarcasm)

"greenwhiteandnogold" wrote:



I'm really disappointed in GB Packer fans. Ya lets build a team around a 40 year old QB. That's REAL smart.

"Roddyboy" wrote:




No, you build a superbowl team around a 40 year old that maybe would have given us more of a chance to go to the superbowl this year. You never "not" take that chance. πŸ™‚
Heathiee
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

No, you build a superbowl team around a 40 year old that maybe would have given us more of a chance to go to the superbowl this year. You never "not" take that chance. :)

"Heatherthepackgirl" wrote:



We tried to, but he retired prematurely and as any and every business does, they had to move forward. Which they did, then our LEGEND decided he wanted to play again after he through the team under the bus on national TV and disrespected the organization.


Kind of hard to just welcome him back with open arms after that and yet the Packers tried, but as BRETT said HIMSELF, there were things HE should have just looked past, but COULDN'T, thus he left no other option other than being traded.

That's not saying I think we have a better chance at winning with any other QB. I said from the start, Brett gave us the best chance to win, period. But let's be real about this and look at the whole picture, not just what we are tied to emotionally.
UserPostedImage
Heatherthepackgirl
16 years ago

No, you build a superbowl team around a 40 year old that maybe would have given us more of a chance to go to the superbowl this year. You never "not" take that chance. :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



We tried to, but he retired prematurely and as any and every business does, they had to move forward. Which they did, then our LEGEND decided he wanted to play again after he through the team under the bus on national TV and disrespected the organization.


Kind of hard to just welcome him back with open arms after that and yet the Packers tried, but as BRETT said HIMSELF, there were things HE should have just looked past, but COULDN'T, thus he left no other option other than being traded.

That's not saying I think we have a better chance at winning with any other QB. I said from the start, Brett gave us the best chance to win, period. But let's be real about this and look at the whole picture, not just what we are tied to emotionally.

"Heatherthepackgirl" wrote:



I understand what you are saying Zero.. πŸ™‚ I hear you when you say Favre retired and the Packers moved on, yes thats what they had to do at that time, but when Favre wanted to come back, wouldnt you have still sat him down and said that they were disappointed in how he handled this situation that he retired to early, but then took him back because it gave us more of a shot this year at winning a superbowl. Just a question. Superbowls dont come around to often and if your given a chance dont you take it then and now?
Heathiee
Fan Shout
beast (37m) : Merry Christmas πŸŽ„πŸŽ
beast (8h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (13h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (15h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

55m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Random Babble / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright Β© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comβ„’. All Rights Reserved.