dfosterf
15 years ago
Center and both guard charts, Wade---

See previous post. I was adding them as I made them.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
Thanks, Foster.

Only one of the OL whose scoring I was surprised at was Tausch. I thought he had been doing better.

And Sitton clearly looks like a major success for the Ted Thompson drafting crew.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
British
15 years ago
Tauscher seems worse than the received wisdom and Colledge seems better.

Centre is a little up and down.

But overall the inside of the line is pretty good according to this with our bookends proving the weak spots.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
I am not saying that profootball focus and their grading system is perfect, but there aren't many places you can go and get a "grade" for an individual position.

The teams obviously do that for every player.

I think a "win" invariably creates the impression that the position in question was at least "adequate", especially when it it is difficult for the casual observer to quantify- as is the case with an offensive line.

Having spent a little time looking at the scores of various players on assorted teams, I have concluded that they (profootball focus) do an amazingly good job. Those graphs are taking into account (in this instance) pass blocking, run blocking, and penalties. Those stats are also available on their site, but the graphical displays were already about as complicated as they can be.

The results are indicative of "we are who we thought we were" to a degree...on that front line.

But here's the rub. If you go start looking at other teams at the positions scored, you will find we fare poorly in the scoring. One cannot help but wonder just how good we would be elsewhere if we had high scorers on that o-line.

I just read King of SI.com speaking about AD and his offensive line. Tuesday Morning MMQ edition. I have read the thread about Grant vs. AD.

Go read that article at SI.com.

Tell me why he is wrong, or tell me I am wrong in still not being confident in our o-line, or tell me why I am wrong in being convinced that we have not seen the true potential of our running backs, AND our pro-bowl QB---

Yes, I think he is THAT good...there is UNREALIZED potential in Aaron Rodgers...but not really any part of my "argument"

This line is no longer KILLING us, but it is by NO MEANS a strength, and IT SHOULD BE. The game is won and lost in the trenches...the truism...is TRUE, with some exceptional exceptions...and that's why they are exceptions :thumbleft:

"Scoring-wise" I can pretty much guarantee that these ?10? individuals, if viewed in the cumulative, will have scored the worst (I would submit "by far") of any of our respective "corps"...Receivers, backs, DB's,DL, LB's etc.

The best part is that they are not viewing these players through my (and your) green and gold goggles. They also don't seem swayed by a win or a loss. I would submit that we are.

I am certainly not discounting our own eyes, and would say that we have a pretty high level of expertise---Yes, we really do---one of the wonders of the information age---zealots can glean quite a bit of information besides the 60 minutes we have all seen each week on the tube, and the discussions only add to an increased capacity to know what the fuck we are talking about, right or wrong on the discussion "in question".
zombieslayer
15 years ago
David - Earlier in this topic, we talked about the Steelers winning 2 SBs with a bad OL. You asked how. If I remember correctly, the Steelers in their SB winning years had the #3 and #1 D. Ours is currently #9. The Steelers even won a SB with their prized QB (a guy I frequently call overrated) having the worst QB performance ever by a winning QB.

Football is a team game. D wins championships, but that's said with a big fat asterisk. A ST or a really bad O can lose a championship. Recent example - da Bears. One of the most exciting Ds I've ever seen, a D that often generates lots of points (I love seeing that). But Wrecks Grossman was so bad he single-handedly lost the game for da Bears, a game they should have easily won.

Will our OL do the same for us? Well, here's the thing. Aaron's getting better at reading blitzes and he's also getting better at getting the ball off. No, he's not a Favre or P Manning yet at getting it off, but he's getting up there.

Will our OL open up holes for Ryan Grant to take some pressure off the passing game? I'd prefer someone else answer this; someone who has more understanding of run blocking.

I will say though that I wish we had a better screen game which I've seen many times driving Ds nuts because you can dump off a screen with a crappy OL and still generate some yards when it should have been a sack.

To answer the big question of "Buy or Sell," I'd like these questions answered first.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago



I am certainly not discounting our own eyes, and would say that we have a pretty high level of expertise---Yes, we really do---one of the wonders of the information age---zealots can glean quite a bit of information besides the 60 minutes we have all seen each week on the tube, and the discussions only add to an increased capacity to know what the fuck we are talking about, right or wrong on the discussion "in question".

"dfosterf" wrote:



+2 for entire post (not just this para).
-1 for wasting your time with Peter King. :)

This is a big part of the reason academics are out of touch. They're hung up on the "expert model" and the notion that one only becomes an "expert" by "being in the formal discipline." Whether that discipline is economics or, here, football, that just isn't the case anymore. If you want to get the best information, you need skills beyond the usual set for whatever it is you are doing.

This is why Belichek, much as I dislike him, is so successful. He doesn't just get his information -- or his ways of processing his information -- just from inside football and its professional networks. He's not just a football guy but what, in an earlier generation, was called a Renaissance man. He brings to his coaching skills from other fields.

Oh, to be sure, football fans are going to be susceptible to the dilettante problem -- if you aren't trained and experienced in Field X, there's going to be some extra susceptibility to certain kinds of mistakes (seeing causation where there's merely correlation, seeing correlation where there isn't any, etc.) when you're talking about X. And if you only spend 10 hours a week (or 0.5 hrs a week) on X, you're not going to miss a lot of stuff that the person who spends 80 hours a week.

But that person who spends 80 hours a week is still sampling. No head coach "knows everything" about football. Even the best only knows a small fraction. The same with GMs. The same with All Pros. If they knew everything, they'd never make mistakes. They'd never misevaluate a player, or make the wrong call or the wrong read.

And because they don't know everything, the dilettantes and part timers may well know things -- important things -- that they don't.

In the pre-Internet days, it might have been true that the "football fraternity" held a monopoly on the information that was valuable about football success. And so, though the "non-fraternity" world likely always had the aptitudes and skills to bring to bear , they simply didn't have the information upon which to bring their aptitudes and skills to bear.

But that is no longer the case. People like profootball focus, people like foster and zombie, now have access to enough information that their aptitudes and skills can be brought to bear in valuable ways.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I am giggling to myself to see how my -1 meme has caught on in this board.

I'm selling too of course. I think improvements brought by Tauscher and Clifton are tenuous and our vulnerabilities will be exposed sooner or later. I certainly want a focus on the offensive line in free agency or draft (or both) next year. Thompson did an amazing job with our defense -- now let's shore up our offense. If we can get this team below 30 sacks next year, I can see us winning the Super Bowl.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

I am giggling to myself to see how my -1 meme has caught on in this board.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



huh?
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago

I am giggling to myself to see how my -1 meme has caught on in this board.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



huh?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Maybe non doesn't watch the show.

I still give him a +1 for giving me a -1 for an incorrect spelling. ...in a frigging PHOTOGRAPH I posted. :sign5:

[youtube]cHHPSJ1fDH4&feature=related[/youtube]
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
I thought the idea of a meme included the notion that ownership/origination of the meme couldn't be definitively attributed?

Sort of the opposite of the philosophy of the OED.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (14h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (14h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (20h) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (20h) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (20h) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
    Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
    Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
    dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
    Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
    Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
    Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
    Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
    beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
    beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
    Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

    8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.