wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Just to let you know before you get on the interstate in Illinois.

Rockford Register Star 

Truckers soon will be able to travel through the area faster.

The speed limit for big trucks on interstates outside Chicagoland goes up to 65 mph Friday matching the speed limits for passenger vehicles even though signs wont say so right away.

Itll take the Illinois Tollway a few days next week to change the regions signs on interstates 90 and 88. And it will take the Illinois Department of Transportation up to two weeks to change signs, including those on I-39.

Its much more economical to do it during the workweek (instead of over the weekend), tollway spokeswoman Joelle McGinnis said.

State police will begin enforcing the new speed limits Friday.

I think its best that they go as fast as cars do, said trucker David Holzer of Ingleside, Ill.

Having trucks limited to 55 mph while passenger vehicles are allowed a speed of 65 caused traffic backups and, at worst, accidents, he said. It led to cars zipping around trucks and cutting in front of them, or tailgating trucks in the passing lane, Holzer said.

The change also brings Illinois truck speed limits in line with Wisconsin and Indiana, though still 5 mph below Iowa, Missouri and Kentucky. Proponents say thatll make Illinois more competitive for trucking firms, distribution centers and others that rely on saving time to stay profitable.

But not everyones in favor. Some motorists fear faster trucks will lead to more and more serious accidents.

Theyre already going faster than the speed limit. Theyre always passing us and were doing the speed limit or five above, said Poplar Grove resident Sue Berggren. I think they will figure, now (that) they can go 65, why not go 70 or 75?

AAA opposed the increase because of safety concerns, though spokeswoman Beth Mosher said most car-semi accidents are caused by the cars.

We think this is a great time for motorists to recognize this and to go back to the tried-and-true, share-the-road tips that perhaps we have all overlooked, Mosher said.

Motorists should stay more than 20 feet in front of and 200 feet behind trucks, and not drive alongside a truck, she said.

Dont pass in front of them until you can see their lights or the cab in your rear-view mirror, Mosher said. Have a greater following distance four to five seconds because they cant brake as fast as cars can. Its especially important now that trucks (will be traveling at) higher speeds.

The speed limit change was co-sponsored by Rep. Jim Sacia, R-Pecatonica. Past efforts had been vetoed by then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich; Gov. Pat Quinn signed this measure in August.

It does not change speed limits on big trucks in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will counties, nor does it change the speed limit on non-interstates like the U.S. 20 bypass.


UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
ugh...i don't like this. when trucks are allowed to go the same speed as cars, it causes MORE backups. they're in the passing lane constantly trying to go 1mph faster than the truck in front of them. it's a nightmare.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

ugh...i don't like this. when trucks are allowed to go the same speed as cars, it causes MORE backups. they're in the passing lane constantly trying to go 1mph faster than the truck in front of them. it's a nightmare.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



:-k Well look at it this way. If the speed limit is 65 then more trucks in the right lane will be doing the speed limit and there will be less need for others to get in the left lane and pass. 🙏
just guessing. :shrug:
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
Good thing. This will cause more vehicles to do the speed limit, or at least keep more the same speed.

Having trucks at 55 while cars are speeding doing 70,75 or more is more dangerous. I hope trucks are in all lanes doing the same speed. Keeping everybody the same.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
4PackGirl
14 years ago
trust me - it doesn't work that way. have you EVER been in WI?? it's a nightmare there! then again, they have nicer roads than us. i guess it's a toss-up, eh?? lol.
hos327
14 years ago
They have pretty much been letting it go for a while anyway. Wondering if Roadway, UPS, and a lot of the other 60 mph restricted companies will reprogram the trucks though. I used to be an owner operator 6 years ago, and absolutely hated the difference and the problems it caused. Loved to run in Wisconsin and Indiana fwiw.
Go Pack Go!
MontanaBob
14 years ago
65 MPH????? The only things in Montana that do 65 are the little old people driving their 1988 Honda Civic with 14.000 miles on it. The Interstates here are 75MPH for cars, trucks, boats, bicycles, pedestrians, deer, elk, and anything else that uses the highways. Which means that if you're doing 80 you most likely will not get a ticket, unless it's in downtown Missoula. Then probably just a warning and a bottle of Moose Drool.
Anyone for a Weenie Roast?
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
The biggest danger on the roads is difference of speeds.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DakotaT
14 years ago

65 MPH????? The only things in Montana that do 65 are the little old people driving their 1988 Honda Civic with 14.000 miles on it. The Interstates here are 75MPH for cars, trucks, boats, bicycles, pedestrians, deer, elk, and anything else that uses the highways. Which means that if you're doing 80 you most likely will not get a ticket, unless it's in downtown Missoula. Then probably just a warning and a bottle of Moose Drool.

"MontanaBob" wrote:



Bob, don't even waste your breathe trying to enlighten these people on how it is out here in God's country. I have a belief that once you set your cruise, the only time you should have to step on the brake is when you use the off ramp. Then I get to Minnesota and the first thing is I get behind some jackass driving 55 on the interstate and is in the left lane. Then he looks at you like your wrong for passing him.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Well, it's nice to know there is sanity with respect to speed limits out there in Dakota and Montana.

Of course you are still nuts for liking winter. 🙂
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.