Rockmolder
15 years ago
The player who got snubbed, for me, is Nick Barnett. How is it that Hawk gets in as an alternate, while Barnett should've been in over Vilma? This is just as bad as him not getting in after his 2007 season. He's going to be our London Fletcher this way.

Grats to Rodgers, Woodson and Collins. 3 very deserved spots.
Greg C.
15 years ago

The player who got snubbed, for me, is Nick Barnett. How is it that Hawk gets in as an alternate, while Barnett should've been in over Vilma? This is just as bad as him not getting in after his 2007 season. He's going to be our London Fletcher this way.

Grats to Rodgers, Woodson and Collins. 3 very deserved spots.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



In '07 there was some speculation that Barnett is not well-liked around the league. That could explain it. He's not exactly a dirty player, but he seems to be one of those guys you only like if he's on your own team. He's having a very good year, and he is clearly better than Hawk.
blank
musccy
15 years ago

And I would've put Donovan McNabb or Tony Romo in front of Aaron Rodgers at quarterback. Rodgers put up a lot of empty numbers in the first half of the season and he takes entirely too many sacks. That's a bad choice by the coaches and players. Romo and McNabb were at their best in December.


ESPN Blog 

This just pissed me off!!! The packers have been one of the hottest teams in the league since week 8, and who was at QB during that tenure? True the same could be said of Dallas and Philly, but A. R. is very deserving.

As others have said, Cliffy and Hawk I'm leery about, but for the most part I think this is fair. Jolly or Cullen deserved some love, but they have NO stats at all...you have to watch every packer game to realize their value
twebdonny
15 years ago
Who cares, becuase the SB is the following week and those players won't be playing anyway ya know...
www.travel-ascending.com
porky88
15 years ago

And I would've put Donovan McNabb or Tony Romo in front of Aaron Rodgers at quarterback. Rodgers put up a lot of empty numbers in the first half of the season and he takes entirely too many sacks. That's a bad choice by the coaches and players. Romo and McNabb were at their best in December.

"musccy" wrote:


ESPN Blog 

This just pissed me off!!! The packers have been one of the hottest teams in the league since week 8, and who was at QB during that tenure? True the same could be said of Dallas and Philly, but A. R. is very deserving.

As others have said, Cliffy and Hawk I'm leery about, but for the most part I think this is fair. Jolly or Cullen deserved some love, but they have NO stats at all...you have to watch every packer game to realize their value



The NFC East blogger wants an NFC East QB ahead of Rodgers. Go figure. Rodgers was the 2nd or 3rd best QB in the conference all year. There really isn't an arguement about it. He's played elite football in the 2nd half of the season including a victory over Dallas. Not many people are going to argue against that IMO.

The only Packer who may of gotten snubbed is Clay Matthews, but I can't argue against anyone ahead of him. I thought the rosters were well done this year except for Bryant McKinnie and Jonathan Vilma ahead of London Fletcher or even Jon Beason.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

And I would've put Donovan McNabb or Tony Romo in front of Aaron Rodgers at quarterback. Rodgers put up a lot of empty numbers in the first half of the season and he takes entirely too many sacks. That's a bad choice by the coaches and players. Romo and McNabb were at their best in December.

"musccy" wrote:


ESPN Blog 

This just pissed me off!!! The packers have been one of the hottest teams in the league since week 8, and who was at QB during that tenure? True the same could be said of Dallas and Philly, but A. R. is very deserving.

As others have said, Cliffy and Hawk I'm leery about, but for the most part I think this is fair. Jolly or Cullen deserved some love, but they have NO stats at all...you have to watch every packer game to realize their value



Morons will be morons. Let em rant.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
15 years ago
Oh woopie! - we had a tough time getting collins into camp this past year cuz of his contract and pro bowl appearance ... look what we got going now again ...

should of paid the man earlier this year; I can see Ted Thompson letting him go (very bad move IMO).

grats to every packer mentioned - even to CM3 nice job for a rookie (glad all those draft picks were on someone that is producing).
isocleas2
15 years ago
It's only what, 5 and a half million to franchise Collins? Money well spent.
Rockmolder
15 years ago

And I would've put Donovan McNabb or Tony Romo in front of Aaron Rodgers at quarterback. Rodgers put up a lot of empty numbers in the first half of the season and he takes entirely too many sacks. That's a bad choice by the coaches and players. Romo and McNabb were at their best in December.

"porky88" wrote:


ESPN Blog 

This just pissed me off!!! The packers have been one of the hottest teams in the league since week 8, and who was at QB during that tenure? True the same could be said of Dallas and Philly, but A. R. is very deserving.

As others have said, Cliffy and Hawk I'm leery about, but for the most part I think this is fair. Jolly or Cullen deserved some love, but they have NO stats at all...you have to watch every packer game to realize their value

"musccy" wrote:



The NFC East blogger wants an NFC East QB ahead of Rodgers. Go figure. Rodgers was the 2nd or 3rd best QB in the conference all year. There really isn't an arguement about it. He's played elite football in the 2nd half of the season including a victory over Dallas. Not many people are going to argue against that IMO.

The only Packer who may of gotten snubbed is Clay Matthews, but I can't argue against anyone ahead of him. I thought the rosters were well done this year except for Bryant McKinnie and Jonathan Vilma ahead of London Fletcher or even Jon Beason.



Jonathan Vilma got in on flashy plays, I reckon. Something both Beason and Fletcher usually don't do a whole lot of.

It's all about that 4th down stop and an int on two consecutive drives to give the Saints a W. And, of course, the amount of publicity for the Saints this year. Same must go for McKinnie, as he's been very average this year.

Then again, fans voted in Jeff Backus. A highly questionable pick, if you ask me.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

The player who got snubbed, for me, is Nick Barnett. How is it that Hawk gets in as an alternate, while Barnett should've been in over Vilma? This is just as bad as him not getting in after his 2007 season. He's going to be our London Fletcher this way.

Grats to Rodgers, Woodson and Collins. 3 very deserved spots.

"Greg C." wrote:



In '07 there was some speculation that Barnett is not well-liked around the league. That could explain it. He's not exactly a dirty player, but he seems to be one of those guys you only like if he's on your own team. He's having a very good year, and he is clearly better than Hawk.

"Rockmolder" wrote:

I wonder if it has to do with him show boating after routine tackles? He did calm that down drastically this year to the point where he would only do it after a sack.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : Golden with two TDs in red zone drills today
    Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : @JacobMorley Shoutout to Quinn Ewers for allowing Matthew Golden to be available when Green Bay picked.
    Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
    Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : Can't find the toggle, lol
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
    Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : *Friday*
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
    Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
    packerfanoutwest (27-Jul) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
    beast (27-Jul) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
    beast (27-Jul) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
    beast (27-Jul) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
    beast (27-Jul) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
    dfosterf (27-Jul) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
    beast (27-Jul) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    9h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Jul / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.