Zero2Cool
15 years ago

What are you missing? A special teams tackle when we needed to hold them to bad field position in the 4th quarter.

"Greg C." wrote:



Yes, that was nice. He also got down there on a punt near the goal line, but unfortunately Kapinos landed it in the end zone

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Some of his punts landed before the end zone, if we had some gunners that could catch the damn ball or knock it back they would have been in the 10 yard line easily. It's annoying how poor we are on that and then everyone just blames the punter because he didn't kick the ball 50 yards and have it stop on a dime.




The punter stands 10-15 yards behind the line of scrimmage.
At first landing, a 45 yard punt has traveled nearly 55-60 yards.
Most gunners can run sub 4.5 40 yard dashes.
Add in the 1.4 seconds it takes to punt the ball and there's no reason at all that we shouldn't have some men down there PROVIDED there is a hang time of 4 seconds or more.

This relates to Bush as he's one of the gunners.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
15 years ago

What are you missing? A special teams tackle when we needed to hold them to bad field position in the 4th quarter.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Yes, that was nice. He also got down there on a punt near the goal line, but unfortunately Kapinos landed it in the end zone

"Greg C." wrote:



Some of his punts landed before the end zone, if we had some gunners that could catch the damn ball or knock it back they would have been in the 10 yard line easily. It's annoying how poor we are on that and then everyone just blames the punter because he didn't kick the ball 50 yards and have it stop on a dime.




The punter stands 10-15 yards behind the line of scrimmage.
At first landing, a 45 yard punt has traveled nearly 55-60 yards.
Most gunners can run sub 4.5 40 yard dashes.
Add in the 1.4 seconds it takes to punt the ball and there's no reason at all that we shouldn't have some men down there PROVIDED there is a hang time of 4 seconds or more.

This relates to Bush as he's one of the gunners.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



There was at least one that landed inside the five yard line, and nobody was there. I'm not sure if there was a second.

The problem with your math is that you are failing to take into account the fact that the gunners and generally double-teamed and pretty much mugged all the way down the field. They are not just running a 50-yard dash. Not on most plays, anyway. I agree that the Packers could do better in that area, though.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
How is my my math wrong? If one does not incorporate a variable, it does not mean the math is wrong. It means a variable was not accounted for.

Why must people have to use such hurtful words. My feelings have been shattered. I'm going to take my balls and go home!!!! :P




There was at least two times the ball could have been stopped if our gunners DID THERE JOB! I see other team's gunners doing it every weekend, why can't ours?

I'm tired of the excuses (from whomever) and the blame always put on the punter. And SOME of the blame must fall on him, especially if he's hitting sub 4 second hang time punts.

If our gunners are routinely getting dominated by double team stoppers, change the gunners! There's also the safety valve dude (usually a FB or TE right?) in the back field. He could be replaced with someone faster. Hell, remember Rob Davis? There were times he'd get down there before most others. He was the one snapping the ball.


My point is this ... the amount of touchbacks does not fall solely on the punters behalf. It's a team game and the team needs to step up. Again, if he's routinely hitting 4 or sub 4 second hang times on punts then the majority of it falls on him.

One of the problems with Jon Ryan was (aside from inconsistent) he would out punt the coverage unit with low deep keeps. Kapinos doesn't have half the leg Ryan does (exaggeration) so that shouldn't be a problem.

Bush and Underwood (or whomever the other gunners are rotating in) need to do a better job of getting under the ball and downing it inside the 20 than has been shown this year.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
15 years ago
I agree, zero, that our gunners could do a better job of fighting off those blocks. I'm not sure how much Bush is at fault for that, though. I don't even know who our other gunner is. Maybe Bush is getting double-teamed and the other guy is not, so it's the other guy who should be making more plays. I just don't know. It's hard to see those guys on TV. I have to admit that I don't have much patience for watching what happens away from the ball.
blank
IronMan
15 years ago
:lurk:
Lynn_Dickey
15 years ago
The point of this thread was that I believed that other teams think Bush is weak, and soon as he is on the field they go after him. I also think he is weak. The other point of this thread was that if we played a good QB with multiple receivers we would have trouble (Vikings, Saints, Cardinals). Post the Steelers, please explain why I am wrong. From JSOnline:

On this day, Bush was exposed for his poor play on the ball and lack of natural instincts playing corner. He gave up the 60-yard touchdown to Wallace, a 54-yard deep ball to receiver Hines Ward and a crucial 20-yard completion to tight end Heath Miller on the game-winning drive.

"One of the things you have to keep doing is coming back," Bush said. "No matter what happens, you have to do that. As a defense we have to have a short memory. They made the last play and that was the difference."

Bush's day got off to a horrible start when he looked back for the ball way too early as Wallace ran a go route down the right sideline. When he looked up, he slowed down and Wallace ran right past him for an easy touchdown.

"I tried to look for the ball," Bush said. "You can't get caught peeking. He's a decent receiver, but I've got to stick to the coverage and keep going."
blank
IronMan
15 years ago

The point of this thread was that I believed that other teams think Bush is weak, and soon as he is on the field they go after him. I also think he is weak. The other point of this thread was that if we played a good QB with multiple receivers we would have trouble (Vikings, Saints, Cardinals). Post the Steelers, please explain why I am wrong. From JSOnline:

On this day, Bush was exposed for his poor play on the ball and lack of natural instincts playing corner. He gave up the 60-yard touchdown to Wallace, a 54-yard deep ball to receiver Hines Ward and a crucial 20-yard completion to tight end Heath Miller on the game-winning drive.

"One of the things you have to keep doing is coming back," Bush said. "No matter what happens, you have to do that. As a defense we have to have a short memory. They made the last play and that was the difference."

Bush's day got off to a horrible start when he looked back for the ball way too early as Wallace ran a go route down the right sideline. When he looked up, he slowed down and Wallace ran right past him for an easy touchdown.

"I tried to look for the ball," Bush said. "You can't get caught peeking. He's a decent receiver, but I've got to stick to the coverage and keep going."

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:


Lay off the guy already.

(sarcasm)
Lynn_Dickey
15 years ago
I don't mean to go after the guy, its just we have a serious problem if we intend to go anywhere in playoffs. (Besides the Crosby)
blank
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (5h) : meh
Zero2Cool (10h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (10h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (10h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (13h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (13h) : Only 4
wpr (13h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (15h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (16h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.