Greg Jennings' Non-TD· Page 2

beast
Select Member

15 years ago

Because the official ruled that he was falling, it was technically the correct call. If you are falling when you catch in the end zone, you must maintain possession all the way to the ground. Jennings failed to do that, so it was not a touchdown. The issue at hand is whether he was falling or not when he caught the ball.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

He wasn't falling when he got three steps in...

He was falling after the defender ran into his legs after him making the catch and taking three steps though....

SHOULD OF BEEN A TD!

millertime
Member

15 years ago

#12

He was robbed. What a horrible call. They made the wrong call twice, once in real time and once after viewing a replay.

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#13

The worst part is I think the official didn't understand the rule. that's no good!

kobe16
Registered

15 years ago

#14

it was clearly a touchdown. possesion + 2 feet down in endzone= TOUCHDOWN.

cheeseheads123
Member

15 years ago

#15

Is there a rule on how many feet a player has to get down to eliminate the going down to the ground rule?

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#16

two.

nerdmann
Premier Member

15 years ago

#17

Is there a rule on how many feet a player has to get down to eliminate the going down to the ground rule?

"cheeseheads123" wrote:

I think the main thing from that standpoint is that he had possession. He wasn't bobbling the ball. The ball was knocked out by the defender after he had already scored.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

yooperfan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#18

Touchdown!!!!!!!!!!

IronMan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#19

I'm pretty sure it was the right call. I am more upset that Jennings couldn't hang on to the ball.

Greg C.
Registered Topic Starter

15 years ago

#20

[quote="Greg C."]They paid us back on the interference non call by Hawk. At least to some degree. The Perierra will admit that was a mistake later in the week.

"nerdmann" wrote:

But the non-call on Hawk was in real time. You expect some of those to get missed. But with the Jennings call, the officials had the opportunity to review the play and still made the wrong call.

I think the officials, overall, do a terrible job with instant replay. They often overturn calls that are too close to overturn, and then sometimes they fail to overturn bad calls. Also, they take too much time to make calls that are obvious as soon as you see the replay.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (16m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (25m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (46m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (54m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS