if you were MN HC...· Page 3

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

Dakota - To be fair to Wallie, EVERYONE knew on every play it would be a run. They completely stacked it against him. Bear QBs were horrible for his entire career until the last few years when McMahon came along and actually completed passes.

So of course he'd fumble. He had 5 guys on him constantly.

I grew up watching Payton and the only RB I can compare him to was Barry. I don't think anyone else was close, and that even includes Emmitt Smith, the guy with all the records.

Now an argument can be made that Jim Brown was better but that was before my time. What's interesting though is if I remember correctly, Brown says that AP could be the next Wallie.

Remains to be seen.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

gotarace
Senior Member

15 years ago

#22

If i was Childress i would make AP carry a football every minute he is on the Vikings training grounds...showers..meals..team meetings...watching film...practice... Then i would fine him a hundred bucks everytime another team mate could knock the ball out of his hands...Apon the fumble being recorded the player causing the fumble would recieve the hundred dollar fine.

Smart As a Horse
Hung Like Einstein

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#23

I'd take Peterson over any Packer RB, with or without the fumbles. A guy like that makes your running game, OL and passing game better out of fear of his talent.

"Formo" wrote:

I tend to lean towards that. But it's still kind of worrisome.. Especially now we are in the home stretch and teams are going to exploit his 'fumblitis'.

"Gravedigga" wrote:

I swear, if his fumbling costs the Favre his last shot at a Superbowl, I will pick up my TV and throw it.

"Formo" wrote:

LOL

How ironic would that be.

Everyone says it'll be Favre that'll throw a handful of picks to cash in another bigtime let down for the Vikings.. And it ends up being AP fumbling it away instead. LOL

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

The irony is you saying "everyone" after you jumped my booty in the other thread for doing something similar. And this is not in The Back Alley. :)

I would like you to read the forums better before making such statements. There's quite a few who felt that Favre would do well as he's not the one pressured to carry the team. He just happens to be doing it from time to time.

RaiderPride
Senior Member

15 years ago

#24

"gotarace" wrote:

Perfect Practice Makes Perfect.

I have read of this type of exercise before and it works.

The only thing I would not do is award the player who knocked the ball out of his hands AP's $100 Make it a donation to the Childrens Hospital, or put it into a team steak dinner fund..... For all of the team building reasons.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

Formo
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#25

I'd take Peterson over any Packer RB, with or without the fumbles. A guy like that makes your running game, OL and passing game better out of fear of his talent.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I tend to lean towards that. But it's still kind of worrisome.. Especially now we are in the home stretch and teams are going to exploit his 'fumblitis'.

"Formo" wrote:

I swear, if his fumbling costs the Favre his last shot at a Superbowl, I will pick up my TV and throw it.

"Gravedigga" wrote:

"Formo" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

The intarweb is a bit bigger than PackersHome.com.. Just FYI..

But, to humor you:

When I say 'Everyone', I mean most of the NFL fans world, with the exception of a few Favre fans, a couple of people here at PackersHome.com, and about 100 people at PP.O.

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#26

I'd take Peterson over any Packer RB, with or without the fumbles. A guy like that makes your running game, OL and passing game better out of fear of his talent.

"Formo" wrote:

I tend to lean towards that. But it's still kind of worrisome.. Especially now we are in the home stretch and teams are going to exploit his 'fumblitis'.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I swear, if his fumbling costs the Favre his last shot at a Superbowl, I will pick up my TV and throw it.

"Formo" wrote:

"Gravedigga" wrote:

"Formo" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You really take things far out of context. Wowsies.

And you're wrong! PackersHome.com INVENTED the internet!

(see, I can say stupid things too! I bet I'm more gooder than you!)

Formo
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#27

I'd take Peterson over any Packer RB, with or without the fumbles. A guy like that makes your running game, OL and passing game better out of fear of his talent.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I tend to lean towards that. But it's still kind of worrisome.. Especially now we are in the home stretch and teams are going to exploit his 'fumblitis'.

"Formo" wrote:

I swear, if his fumbling costs the Favre his last shot at a Superbowl, I will pick up my TV and throw it.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"Formo" wrote:

"Gravedigga" wrote:

"Formo" wrote:

You really take things far out of context. Wowsies.

And you're wrong! PackersHome.com INVENTED the internet!

(see, I can say stupid things too! I bet I'm more gooder than you!)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I know someone who's sheep didn't put out last night.. Sheesh.

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#28

I know someone who's sheep didn't put out last night.. Sheesh.

"Formo" wrote:

lmao you're the one going over board then you say stuff like this about me? It's like talking to Lydia! Stuff goes in one ear and out the next and we're back at square one pretending to have made progress.

Anyhow, I don't think Peterson's fumbles are that much of a problem. He scores what two touchdowns for every fumble lost?

Gravedigga
Registered

15 years ago

#29

There's quite a few who felt that Favre would do well as he's not the one pressured to carry the team. He just happens to be doing it from time to time.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Yea, time to time. As in once per week.

--------------------------------------------

A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d

Gravedigga
Registered

15 years ago

#30

I'd take Peterson over any Packer RB, with or without the fumbles. A guy like that makes your running game, OL and passing game better out of fear of his talent.

"Formo" wrote:

I tend to lean towards that. But it's still kind of worrisome.. Especially now we are in the home stretch and teams are going to exploit his 'fumblitis'.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I swear, if his fumbling costs the Favre his last shot at a Superbowl, I will pick up my TV and throw it.

"Formo" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"Formo" wrote:

"Gravedigga" wrote:

You really take things far out of context. Wowsies.

And you're wrong! PackersHome.com INVENTED the internet!

(see, I can say stupid things too! I bet I'm more gooder than you!)

"Formo" wrote:

I know someone who's sheep didn't put out last night.. Sheesh.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Would you guys just make love to eachother and get it over with. Enough with the e-flirting.

--------------------------------------------

A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (17h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (22h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS