Brandon Jackson · PACKERSHOME

Greg C.
Registered Topic Starter

15 years ago

Nice game for him today. Four carries for 16 yards and six receptions for 65 yards. I've been wanting him to be more involved in the game plan. He was, and he responded.

I wonder what happened to Ahman Green? I don't think he even suited up. They must've had all three fullbacks on the gameday roster, but not Ahman. Did he get hurt in practice or something?

blank

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

nerdmann
Premier Member

15 years ago

"Greg C." wrote:

Groin. Bjack looked good though. He was a little rough on about the first three screens, but settled in. Nice to see.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

blueleopard
Member

15 years ago

Brandon Jackson is looking like our version of Kevin Faulk/Chester Taylor.

Systematic backs are fine, just as long as they do what they're paid to do.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

shield4life
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Brandon Jackson is looking like our version of Kevin Faulk/Chester Taylor.

Systematic backs are fine, just as long as they do what they're paid to do.

"blueleopard" wrote:

Agreed I've always wanted BJ involved in the game more. :whipitgood:

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

Dulak
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Brandon Jackson is looking like our version of Kevin Faulk/Chester Taylor.

Systematic backs are fine, just as long as they do what they're paid to do.

"shield4life" wrote:

Agreed I've always wanted BJ involved in the game more. :whipitgood:

"blueleopard" wrote:

Jackson was my favorite back last year and I have been itching for Mike McCarthy to get him some playing time (pretty tired of seeing grant run up the middle for 1-2 yards). (although looks like grant did ok in yesterdays game (still need to see it)).

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

Brandon Jackson is looking like our version of Kevin Faulk/Chester Taylor.

Systematic backs are fine, just as long as they do what they're paid to do.

"blueleopard" wrote:

I'd compare him to Kevin Faulk, yes, but not to Chester Taylor. Kevin Faulk is nothing more but a receiver who runs from time to time. Chester Taylor could be the feature back for quite some teams.

That said, I loved the way he played yesterday. Same goes for Grant. Our RBs just seemed to be in sync with the O-line and had a great game.

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

Green was injured on Wed??? groin issues

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

He knows how to get a first down on those screens, unless 3 or 4 tacklers are coming at him and he has zero blockers. It's fun to see. People seem to underestimate his speed and power and he just blows through them to move the chains.

Greg C.
Registered Topic Starter

15 years ago

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

Yeah, that's one of the things I like about Jackson. I've seen it before. He has a nose for the first-down marker. He finishes well on his runs.

blank

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#10

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Agreed. Taylor could probably start for 5-10 teams in the NFL. Faulk couldn't start for any team. However, Faulk is a very solid player for the role he plays. He has sweet hands and gets Brady the yards they need.

I think Jackson could be like Faulk. I see Faulk line up as a WR all the time. Give opposing Ds headaches. Have Jackson in the backfield then suddenly have him line up as a WR. We did something like it yesterday with our FBs lining up as TEs or starting as TEs then coming back to the FB position. I love stuff like that. Drive opposing DCs nuts.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (23m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (37m) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (39m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (40m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (41m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (41m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (45m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (45m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (46m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (46m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (48m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (50m) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (54m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (56m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (56m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (1h) : Packers will get in

beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!

wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS