New favorite player...· Page 2

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

Yes, I also believe that AJ Hawk deserves a ton of credit. You can see what he did for Barnett on that sack he had....If it weren't for AJ, that sack would have never happened.

I think maybe it's time to let Hawk pad his stats instead of making him the block-eater. Lets see what he can do getting to the QB.

I never really felt that AJ was ever bad.....like some others did here. I don't buy into that bullshit that he should live up to his #5 draft position. He has contributed to this team very well since he has been here.

When you are about to blast Hawk, consider this: Who would be our middle linebacker opposite of Barnett?

Yes, Brandon Chiller is a very good linebacker, but I don't think he is nearly as physical as Hawk is; I believe that he is primarily a pass situation linebacker. And Bishop is a great physical presence, but I don't see him as a starter; to vulnerable in coverage.

I am done with my rant, and I am happy Hawk is on my team.

doddpower
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#12

CM3 is quickly becoming one of my favorite players as well. I love the way he plays the game.

Hopefully it continues!

nerdmann
Premier Member

15 years ago

#13

I hope Brad Jones becomes his book end for the next 10 years. 09 would really be an amazing draft, especially if TJ Lang continues his improvement.

CM3 just has incredible football awareness and intelligence to go along with his superb physical tools.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Brad Jones was listed with a concussion in one of the reports. Hope he's ok. Could be one reason Kampy's getting the nod.
Brad Jones has the potential to become my favorite player.
http://twitter.com/packer_update
"On 2nd glance: On at least three occasions, the depth of OLB Brad Jones' drops forced QB Tony Romo to look away from his intended receiver."

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#14

Yeah, Brad Jones really looked like he belonged in there. I hope he's ok.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

millertime
Member

15 years ago

#15

I like Finley, Sitton, and Matthews.

I'm on the fence about Lang, but for a rookie he's got a chance to become a legit starter. If that happens, I'll like him a lot more.

djcubez
Senior Member

15 years ago

#16

"go.pack.go." wrote:

I don't think anyone ever though AJ Hawk was bad I just think everyone believed he could be better. And if Sunday is a sign of the future he certainly can be better than he has been.

LambeauEast
Rookie

15 years ago

#17

Yeah, Clay is a beast.

flep
Member

15 years ago

#18

Is it just me or did players realise that in Kamps absence they had to step up.?

It seems that we have ben over-reliant on Kamp and the other payers relaxed when he was on the field expecting him to be his usual dominant force. But Kamp playing OLB has changed the way he plays and he is still adapting to his new discipline.

The D looked the best it ha all season with the LB's playing hard and awesome all game.

Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years

I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!

Yerko
Senior Member

15 years ago

#19

I jumped on the Clay Matthews III train a little while back. Great football player all around.

Great pick up by the Pack.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#20

I might have to get a Clay Matthews III jersey next.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (15m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (16m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (28m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (3h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (3h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (3h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (3h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (3h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (7h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (9h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (9h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS