TwinkieGorilla
15 years ago

blah blah blah i have to depend on an ex-Packer for my team to be decent and blah blah blah *yawn* *fart* blah blah and I bet the Bearce are as good as the Packers.

"Formo" wrote:



no.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Wow.

Cutler's stats wouldn't be bad if it weren't for all those INTs.

"Formo" wrote:



And if the Packers didn't have those four losses they'd be undefeated. Thanks for the tip Mr. Obvious.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Just pointing it out. People call Cutler horrible and such.. And while he's 'sucking it up', he's still a serviceable QB. Don't throw those picks, and I bet the Bearce are as good as the Packers.

"Formo" wrote:


Orton was serviceable.
Cutler is a pick machine and cost a lot of potential talent that was lost in draft picks.

All Orton did for the Bears was win games. The guy came in as a rookie and netted what eight games in a row or something? Gets yanked for Rex, they fail.

The Bears would have been better off keeping Orton and their draft picks, in my thinking.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
I am glad the Bears made that trade.. it has saddled the franchise with a roller coaster for a QB for many years.. the weakest part of Cutlers game is between his ears.. he has the poise of a jack rabbit mainlining caffeine.

Much like McNabb.. will be a yearly tease because of his physical skills only to be let down in the crunch.. they don't have the makeup to be leaders when the caca hits the fan.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
15 years ago

I am glad the Bears made that trade.. it has saddled the franchise with a roller coaster for a QB for many years.. the weakest part of Cutlers game is between his ears.. he has the poise of a jack rabbit mainlining caffeine.

Much like McNabb.. will be a yearly tease because of his physical skills only to be let down in the crunch.. they don't have the makeup to be leaders when the caca hits the fan.

"pack93z" wrote:



This pretty much nails it.

I remember a few picks the other night (at least 2) that can't be pinned SOLEY on Cutler. Hester slipped up on the one pick.. and the other was a tip-drill pick. I gotta believe there were a few more of those types of INTs that Cutler threw.

Now the picks that he threw that were blatent.. I think he just needs more of a offensive line and a REAL WR (not Hester, BTW). I think that would settle him down enough for him to make proper reads/decisions.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Rockmolder
15 years ago

I am glad the Bears made that trade.. it has saddled the franchise with a roller coaster for a QB for many years.. the weakest part of Cutlers game is between his ears.. he has the poise of a jack rabbit mainlining caffeine.

Much like McNabb.. will be a yearly tease because of his physical skills only to be let down in the crunch.. they don't have the makeup to be leaders when the caca hits the fan.

"Formo" wrote:



This pretty much nails it.

I remember a few picks the other night (at least 2) that can't be pinned SOLEY on Cutler. Hester slipped up on the one pick.. and the other was a tip-drill pick. I gotta believe there were a few more of those types of INTs that Cutler threw.

Now the picks that he threw that were blatent.. I think he just needs more of a offensive line and a REAL WR (not Hester, BTW). I think that would settle him down enough for him to make proper reads/decisions.

"pack93z" wrote:



I don't know, Hester is coming along quite nicely. With Cutler's arm, he could be something special... if Cutler gets some time in the pocket.

The guy can run, but he has horrible throwing mechanics, especially off the run. He needs an O-line so he can get settled. Or a coach like McCarthy. It's weird that he didn't get all of this sorted out under Shanahan. And it's only getting worse with the Bears, who have no guidance for QBs at all.

My only opinion is Rodgers would have been a disaster had he played right away. The Rodgers from Cal and now are 2 completely diff players. And that's because of McCarthy's coaching.

"Greg A. Bedard" wrote:



Makes you wonder what would've happened if Rodgers went to Denver one year earlier and we drafted Cutler.
Formo
15 years ago

I am glad the Bears made that trade.. it has saddled the franchise with a roller coaster for a QB for many years.. the weakest part of Cutlers game is between his ears.. he has the poise of a jack rabbit mainlining caffeine.

Much like McNabb.. will be a yearly tease because of his physical skills only to be let down in the crunch.. they don't have the makeup to be leaders when the caca hits the fan.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



This pretty much nails it.

I remember a few picks the other night (at least 2) that can't be pinned SOLEY on Cutler. Hester slipped up on the one pick.. and the other was a tip-drill pick. I gotta believe there were a few more of those types of INTs that Cutler threw.

Now the picks that he threw that were blatent.. I think he just needs more of a offensive line and a REAL WR (not Hester, BTW). I think that would settle him down enough for him to make proper reads/decisions.

"Formo" wrote:



I don't know, Hester is coming along quite nicely. With Cutler's arm, he could be something special... if Cutler gets some time in the pocket.

"pack93z" wrote:



I disagree. Keep Hester back deep to return kicks/punts and do reverses/screens with him. He's had more than enough time to learn to be a real WR and still not seeing much from him.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Rockmolder
15 years ago

I am glad the Bears made that trade.. it has saddled the franchise with a roller coaster for a QB for many years.. the weakest part of Cutlers game is between his ears.. he has the poise of a jack rabbit mainlining caffeine.

Much like McNabb.. will be a yearly tease because of his physical skills only to be let down in the crunch.. they don't have the makeup to be leaders when the caca hits the fan.

"Formo" wrote:



This pretty much nails it.

I remember a few picks the other night (at least 2) that can't be pinned SOLEY on Cutler. Hester slipped up on the one pick.. and the other was a tip-drill pick. I gotta believe there were a few more of those types of INTs that Cutler threw.

Now the picks that he threw that were blatent.. I think he just needs more of a offensive line and a REAL WR (not Hester, BTW). I think that would settle him down enough for him to make proper reads/decisions.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



I don't know, Hester is coming along quite nicely. With Cutler's arm, he could be something special... if Cutler gets some time in the pocket.

"Formo" wrote:



I disagree. Keep Hester back deep to return kicks/punts and do reverses/screens with him. He's had more than enough time to learn to be a real WR and still not seeing much from him.

"pack93z" wrote:



He's projected to go over a 1000 yards this season. And this is just his thrid season at WR. He's shown signs of improvement every year. I think that he can become a pretty decent WR.

That said, he won't be a special one. Something he used to be at returning kicks and punts. They should draft another receiver and get him back there. He's like Tasker. He's too important on special teams to use anywhere else.

It pretty much got them to the SB his rookie season, right?
Gravedigga
15 years ago

I am glad the Bears made that trade.. it has saddled the franchise with a roller coaster for a QB for many years.. the weakest part of Cutlers game is between his ears.. he has the poise of a jack rabbit mainlining caffeine.

Much like McNabb.. will be a yearly tease because of his physical skills only to be let down in the crunch.. they don't have the makeup to be leaders when the caca hits the fan.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



This pretty much nails it.

I remember a few picks the other night (at least 2) that can't be pinned SOLEY on Cutler. Hester slipped up on the one pick.. and the other was a tip-drill pick. I gotta believe there were a few more of those types of INTs that Cutler threw.

Now the picks that he threw that were blatent.. I think he just needs more of a offensive line and a REAL WR (not Hester, BTW). I think that would settle him down enough for him to make proper reads/decisions.

"Formo" wrote:



I don't know, Hester is coming along quite nicely. With Cutler's arm, he could be something special... if Cutler gets some time in the pocket.

The guy can run, but he has horrible throwing mechanics, especially off the run. He needs an O-line so he can get settled. Or a coach like McCarthy. It's weird that he didn't get all of this sorted out under Shanahan. And it's only getting worse with the Bears, who have no guidance for QBs at all.

My only opinion is Rodgers would have been a disaster had he played right away. The Rodgers from Cal and now are 2 completely diff players. And that's because of McCarthy's coaching.

"pack93z" wrote:



Makes you wonder what would've happened if Rodgers went to Denver one year earlier and we drafted Cutler.

"Greg A. Bedard" wrote:



I've seen almost all the bears game for the last 2 years. Hester is a good #3 receiver thrust into the #1 spot. He will NEVER be a #1. Never i say!! He doesn't have the instincts. He catches the ball in space and he's lost out there. This isn't a punt return where it's structured, he has his blockers and he knows what he's doing. He's good on WR screens and deep plays. His hands suck for a WR and he sucks after the catch on medium routes. He doesn't have the instincts that a receiver for 10 years through highschool & college has. Doesn't fight for the ball. Doesn't come back to the ball. Route running is average/below average. He wouldn't be one of our top 4 receivers when our guys are healthy.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
I've bemoaned this several times before. The Bears are ruining one of the best returners of the decade, maybe two decades, by using him as a WR. Devin Hester should be only returning kicks and punts with the occasional blend in on offense.

Bears should have signed Joey Galloway and relegated Hester to returning as his primary role.
UserPostedImage
Formo
15 years ago

I've bemoaned this several times before. The Bears are ruining one of the best returners of the decade, maybe two decades, by using him as a WR. Devin Hester should be only returning kicks and punts with the occasional blend in on offense.

Bears should have signed Joey Galloway and relegated Hester to returning as his primary role.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I agree, 100%

They need a TRUE veteran WR and a few very talented young WRs. Then they can use Hester much like they did in his rookie year. And on screens/reverses.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (43m) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (14h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (14h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
    packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
    Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    10 - 22
    Recent Topics
    23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.