I'm not sure I can say anything about the beat down the Minnesota Vikings gave the Green Bay Packers that anyone hasn't already said. While the game wasn't season defining, it certainly was a big game the Packers had to have if they wanted to have a realistic chance at the division. The Packers were beat in every phase of the game and the better team clearly came out on top.
Minnesota is just better than Green Bay right now. That's not to say the Packers can't get lucky and catch the Vikings. They can, but the percentage of it happening is very slim. The Vikings would have to sustain injuries to key players such as Adrian Peterson, Jared Allen, or Brett Favre and the Packers would have to remain injury free. The Vikings would have to choke away under the pressure which is something they've done in the past while the Packers would have to rise to the occasion. Something they've yet to do under Mike McCarthy.
The Packers won't concede the division publicly, but the standings will likely show Green Bay at three games including the tiebreaker back of Minnesota by the time both teams play eight games. The Packers will be rewarded with a pair of home games against playoff contenders Dallas and San Francisco followed by a Thanksgiving showdown with Detroit.
Minnesota will be rewarded with an unusual three consecutive home stretch against the likes of the Lions, Seahawks, and Bears. Even if Green Bay can go on a run which is possible by looking at their schedule, Minnesota is probably going to get to 10-1 or at the very least, 9-2.
Is the season over then?
Absolutely not. You don't need to win the division to make a run in the playoffs. It certainly helps, but in recent history, two teams have played zero home games and gone onto win the Super Bowl. In the case of the 2007 New York Giants, they actually beat the Dallas Cowboys in what turned out to be the last playoff game in Texas Stadium.
How is the relevant to the Packers?
Dallas swept New York that year during the regular season. I wouldn't dare suggest that Green Bay would beat Minnesota a third time around in the playoffs. Afterall, I picked Minnesota to win both games against the Packers as the matchup just favors the Vikings top to bottom. However, Packer fans need to remember that the season is a marathon and a lot can happen.
What I KnowThe Packers loss to the Vikings in both games not because of Aaron Rodgers, but because Minnesota is a very very good football team. The comparisons between Rodgers and Favre are now irrelevant. Favre plays on a team with arguably the best 4-3 pass rusher, runningback, and offensive lineman in football. Where is that type of talent on Green Bay? No where to be seen, which is why the best thing that ever happen to Brett Favre late in his career could very well be the Packers' decision to move on from him. Have Favre fans thought of that?
What I'm ThinkingNow that the media circus has left the town, perhaps Green Bay can focus on football. The distractions have come and conquered. It's not good, but at least it's over with. The Packers can move on and worry about themselves.
What I'm WonderingHow good is the Packers' defense? Statistically, Green Bay is very good on the defensive side of the ball, but in two games versus Minnesota, Green Bay gave up 30 and 38 points respectively. Was that because Brett Favre was just going to be unstoppable regardless of how good the Packers defense is playing? Maybe or maybe the Packer' defense isn't that much better. My guess is the answer falls somewhere in between.
What I Don't KnowWill Packer fans treat the Dallas game as big as Minnesota? Right now, that seems like a no due to obvious reasons, but the fact is, Dallas coming to Lambeau is always big and could have huge playoff ramifications. The likely loser could find themselves in a hole as they make a playoff push with the winner feeling confident. I know the game will be big, but I feel like I'm the only one that believes this at this time.
What I LikeI like the fact Tampa Bay is going throwback this week. Yes, the old Buccaneers uniforms are ugly, but it reminds me of the 1990's all over again. Those were good times for both Green Bay and Tampa Bay to some extent. A little blast to the past could do both the players, coaches, and fans some good.
[url=index.php?name=Pro_News&aid=118]full article[/url].