The grass is always greener...· Page 3

Greg C.
Registered

15 years ago

I thought Tauscher had declined last season before the injury. I know he only gave up two sacks, but he seemed to lose some of his power, especially as a run blocker. I can't prove it, of course, because there are no good stats for offensive linemen. Number of sacks is about it, and it's only a partial and somewhat subjective measure of a lineman's performance in pass protection.

blank

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#22

You know what!

I agree with you! I think Snyder sucks to

But since you bit the hook heres a bit of info for you.

The Daniel Snyder led Redskins have a 1 game advamtage record-wise in the last 4 years over the Ted Thompson led Packers.

So everything you say about Snyder goes for Thompson. Different approaches same result - Failure

So to sum it up in your own words.....

Ha, Thompson is a freaking joke in football.

His franchise are a laughing stock.

They are a train wreck of a franchise

Now be hypocritical and go off into some rant about cap space, or untapped talent or how we will win games in 2012

Snyder is a joke.....but he's not quite as much of a joke as Ted Thompson. At least he tries to improve his team

blank

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#23

"dd80forever" wrote:

You are hilarious! You should take your routine on the road! Seriously......i have never had such lame arguments thrown at me! I'm stting here laughing!
Thats ok....you just keep rambling on and on. I'm sure everyone else is getting a kick out of it! LOLOL!!!

Greg C.
Registered

15 years ago

#24

dd80forever: Those were Thompson's first four years. It is expected that when a new GM and new coach come in, there are going to be a couple of down years. And if Thompson was considered to be "a joke," he would not have won the Executive of the Year award after the 2007 season. If his reputation has fallen so far just one year after that, it must be the best-kept secret in football, because I sure haven't heard about it. Maybe you should go to the Smack Forum, if we still have one of those here.

blank

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#25

Oh Greg....he DOES go there.
Here he was having SO much fun....only to have you jump in and RUIN it all with those damn great points!
SHAME on you Greg!!!LOLOL!!!

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#26

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

blank

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#27

"Greg C." wrote:

Executive of the year? Oh boy. Care to tell me where other Executives of the years are these days?

While you are at it look at Snyders record from his first 4 seasons as well.

Excuse #2 debunked.

blank

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#28

VP Vinny Cerrato is actually considered the GM, not Snyder. Just want to help you get your story straight.

djcubez
Senior Member

15 years ago

#29

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#30

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"djcubez" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (11h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (11h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (14h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (14h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (14h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (14h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (14h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (14h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (14h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (14h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (15h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (16h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (16h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (17h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (18h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (19h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (19h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (20h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (20h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (21h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS