Wait, so now I have a requirement on how much I reply with? Fuck! I thought I had ENOUGH shit on my plate. Now I have a minimum on what I say!
I think I'm more surprised that someone wants MORE words from me than anything else. :)
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
Nah it's just kind of a dick move to reply to my well detailed post with a one-liner in attempt to disprove everything I said. I mean YOU are the one that always asks for explanation and sources so why don't YOU ever give them? I'm not starting to try and start a fight or anything either, I like you but you still irk me from time to time :P
"djcubez" wrote:
With yours, that's all that needed to be said. Four quarters to a game. I had nothing further to add. You either see what I'm saying, or don't. I've begun losing my will to explain in great detail to people who appear want nothing more than to argue. Not saying you are, but quite a few and it's boring. now I'm being called a dick. It's crazy how things are around here at times. I don't post sources now? I don't explain myself now? W. O. W.
The Bronco's beating the Bengals in week one, that was luck.
The Ravens beating the Vikings, was not luck. If the Ravens had a better kicker, they win. They didn't, so they lost. btw, did you know the Packers played yesterday and won? Pretty neat eh?
"Zero2Cool" wrote: