Tauscher is coming back!· Page 4

gbguy20
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Mark has not yet been signed, all he has done is a workout for us and not signed with us. So is he back, just for a workout for now. They guy is coming back from Major Knee surgery and just finished Rehab few days back. So let's see what happens after today's workout, and yes I do want to see him back as our tackle. Hopefully, Allen Barbe can watch and learn how to defend against fast linemen.

"Kingdom22" wrote:

they are working on a contract for him right now. read before you post.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

shield4life
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#32

Great news couldn't be any happier.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

musccy
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#33

Great news couldn't be any happier.

"shield4life" wrote:

I would be happier if they brought in levi jones, john runyan, anthony munoz, forrest gregg, and every other frickin' o-lineman we can find to try out...hell, bring in a line from the CFL...I don't care at this point, just show some signs that the packers acknowledge the current tackles are a trainwreck and this needs to be fixed NOW!

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#34

Looking forward to Mark's return (fingers crossed). Career WI player. Would love to see it.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#35

you guys saw that Mike McCarthy said barbre would still be the starter even if they acquired taucher ... and that he would have to compete for the starting position.

I See this more as a bandaid then a actually fix - I think many things need to be done. And IMO some things were done in this game.

"pack93z" wrote:

Should he have to compete for the job.. hell yes.

"Dulak" wrote:

Wow imagine that a guy that was a starter, that missed a lot of time in between starts, is coming back and is told he has to compete

What aconcept

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#36

"longtimefan" wrote:

Should he have to compete for the job.. hell yes.

"pack93z" wrote:

Wow imagine that a guy that was a starter, that missed a lot of time in between starts, is coming back and is told he has to compete

What a concept

"Dulak" wrote:

I wonder if Greta has an opening ...

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#37

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Should he have to compete for the job.. hell yes.

"longtimefan" wrote:

Wow imagine that a guy that was a starter, that missed a lot of time in between starts, is coming back and is told he has to compete

What a concept

"pack93z" wrote:

I wonder if Greta has an opening ...

"Dulak" wrote:

Ohhh she has a few but they are not worth Marks time to slam into them..

OO you meant on the tv show

;)

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#38

"longtimefan" wrote:

Should he have to compete for the job.. hell yes.

"pack93z" wrote:

Wow imagine that a guy that was a starter, that missed a lot of time in between starts, is coming back and is told he has to compete

What aconcept

"Dulak" wrote:

Cmon LTF you can't find anything better than that, it was pretty lame to even try and compare the 2. But seeing i like you Ill give ya a B for effort 😉

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

gijoe82
Registered

15 years ago

#39

I am a little cautious about the whole thing. Mark was never a good run blocker, and are we bankrupting the future (Barbe?) by not allowing him to play through some bad games? Seems to me I remember alot of the same talk about colledge his first season and a half. It took him (colledge) some time to truly become a starter. Also I am not so sure how bad he has played over the last couple of games. Allen had what 4 and a half sacks playing over colledge. I am working on downloading last nights game to watch where the pressure came from.
I am just wanting to play devils advocate guys. Hope we arent proloning the growing pains for this quick fix.

blank

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#40

"dhazer" wrote:

Should he have to compete for the job.. hell yes.

"longtimefan" wrote:

Wow imagine that a guy that was a starter, that missed a lot of time in between starts, is coming back and is told he has to compete

What aconcept

"pack93z" wrote:

Cmon LTF you can't find anything better than that, it was pretty lame to even try and compare the 2. But seeing i like you Ill give ya a B for effort ;)

"Dulak" wrote:

I will give you a F for FAIL

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (5h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (10h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (12h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (22h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (22h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (22h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS