Zero2Cool
15 years ago
We were 6 - 10 last season. We are switching from a 4 - 3 to a 3 - 4 in which most pundits claim takes several seasons before you reap the full benefits. These pundits say we can't stop the run, we have a mediocre running game and an inexperienced QB who can't win the close games for us.


Why the hell are ranked so high in the power rankings? I'm kind of like bozz on this too. When we're so high, I think, wtf why, don't do that. Under the radar is what I want. And when they dog us up and down, it bugs me too. The pundits seem to always be extreme no love, or too much love.

I think we're around the bottom of the top half of the league. We haven't shown anyone anything yet. We gave up a poor ass 352 yards against the freaking BEARS!

On the flip side of that, it was the first game of the year. It was against a helluva rival that no matter how good each team is, it's always a good battle.

I'm not saying we suck, by no means am I saying that. I'm excited for this team, very excited. I just don't like being handed paper trophies without merit.

So I'm asking you ... where's all the damn hype coming from when most of what I read from these people is the Packers are lacking?
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
For me it is pretty simple.. the power ranking are nothing more that fodder to foster discussion.

I will take more value in the playoff thread that Cheeze, as the season progresses it will tell more of the story than some two bit power ranking.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Okay, but ... I'm asking why so high? Not if they are accurate, relevant or worth while.

Packers? Dog dog dog ... good preaseason PACKERS ARE SUPERBOWL BOUND!!

Did their opinions change that much just over a few pre season games?

What was it? Why do I not see it and I consider myself a fairly knowledgeable fan, at times.

In '07 I didn't think we were as good as our record indicated, cuz we got a lot of lucky bounces. In '08 same thing, but other side. I don't think we were a six win team, but got some unlucky bounces. I think both seasons we were 10-11 win team and 8-9 win respectfully. But you can't like with the W column, it is what it is.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
Why so high.. because we showed flash in the preseason.

We lost no one of importance over the offseason.

We went out and got a hired gun to run the defense.

We have assembled a defensive coaching staff that is jacked up and motivated.

We have a QB that put up rare numbers last season, his first year starting.. and looked to have the poise of the elite in the league.

We have a Receiving corp that can be talked about amongst the best.

And more importantly, we might be the youngest team in the league again, but we have the core group that has been together for a couple of season.

Just a few.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
But we didn't sign any big name free agents ...
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
In other words.. those that create the power rankings skim the headline and reports and fabricate some type of ranking for the teams.

They don't have some scientific method developed.. no they are going on the "buzz" around the league and some type of feeling..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Well that goes more to proving my theory that 'writers' or whatever they are called are irresponsible to their job description.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
Your not going to get an argument from me..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
gbguy20
15 years ago

We were 6 - 10 last season. We are switching from a 4 - 3 to a 3 - 4 in which most pundits claim takes several seasons before you reap the full benefits. These pundits say we can't stop the run, we have a mediocre running game and an inexperienced QB who can't win the close games for us.


Why the hell are ranked so high in the power rankings? I'm kind of like bozz on this too. When we're so high, I think, wtf why, don't do that. Under the radar is what I want. And when they dog us up and down, it bugs me too. The pundits seem to always be extreme no love, or too much love.

I think we're around the bottom of the top half of the league. We haven't shown anyone anything yet. We gave up a poor ass 352 yards against the freaking BEARS!

On the flip side of that, it was the first game of the year. It was against a helluva rival that no matter how good each team is, it's always a good battle.

I'm not saying we suck, by no means am I saying that. I'm excited for this team, very excited. I just don't like being handed paper trophies without merit.

So I'm asking you ... where's all the damn hype coming from when most of what I read from these people is the Packers are lacking?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



ok ok, irrelevant to the thread i know. But that number is very misleading. With as much time as our defense spent on the field that game, i'm ok with that number.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
dfosterf
15 years ago
These guys doing the talking are all journalist majors, pretty much.

They seek a story line, find the fodder for their thesis, and run with it.

The easiest thing to do is to look at what happened in the preseason and use that for their new and profoundly insightful brand of sports journalism.

Few of them bring any true insight about what is probably GOING to happen, but rather bring what ever they feel like spouting in the what just did happen category, and using THAT as a predictor.

The REAL sports journalists should be sweating our o-line just like I am...not because of Sunday so much, but because of the context of what we have attempted to do about that line in so many ways and still have (apparently) not done.

This would take some in-depth analysis...good luck waiting for that. Instead what you are going to get is 50 stories about how Aaron Rodgers got a mythical monkey off his back by throwing one completion too late in a football game to have it rendered meaningless once again.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (12h) : I have always admired the pluck of the man
Zero2Cool (14h) : I remember thinking he was going to be something good.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : The Dualing Banjo!
Zero2Cool (31-Jan) : Jets have named Chris Banjo as their special teams coordinator, Former Packers player
Zero2Cool (31-Jan) : Jaguars have hired Anthony Campanile as their DC. We lose coach
Zero2Cool (30-Jan) : QB coach Sean Mannion
Zero2Cool (30-Jan) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington
dfosterf (30-Jan) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport
dfosterf (30-Jan) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft
dfosterf (30-Jan) : So eeri
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?
beast (30-Jan) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.
beast (30-Jan) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired
beast (30-Jan) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over
beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.