DakotaT
15 years ago

Chillar has been the Packers' best linebacker since he got here - he's the best in coverage and quite possibly the best blitzer. He needs to start in my opinion, Thompson/McCarthy are just worried about the backlash if they bench the #5 overall pick A.J. Hawk.

"masseyattack" wrote:



It won't be Hawk getting benched. Barnett can take all year to heal as far as I'm concerned. Hopefully someone ponies up a 2nd or 3rd for him.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
If Hawk continues to play like last night.. I agree he will see his share of snaps.

Personally, I think the Packers are trying to garner some interest in the trade market for one of these interior backers..

What is sick.. is that the defense didn't even get to put Bishop in.. that is just crazy depth inside.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
DakotaT
15 years ago

If Hawk continues to play like last night.. I agree he will see his share of snaps.

Personally, I think the Packers are trying to garner some interest in the trade market for one of these interior backers..

What is sick.. is that the defense didn't even get to put Bishop in.. that is just crazy depth inside.

"pack93z" wrote:



Jacksonvilled drafted 2 OT's and still have a pretty good one. They would make a good trading partner. Besides they still owe us for giving away Brunell.
UserPostedImage
millertime
15 years ago

Chillar has been the Packers' best linebacker since he got here - he's the best in coverage and quite possibly the best blitzer. He needs to start in my opinion, Thompson/McCarthy are just worried about the backlash if they bench the #5 overall pick A.J. Hawk.

"DakotaT" wrote:



It won't be Hawk getting benched. Barnett can take all year to heal as far as I'm concerned. Hopefully someone ponies up a 2nd or 3rd for him.

"masseyattack" wrote:



We don't need to trade Barnett. Our LB depth is what you need when you run a 3-4. Barnett is a great player, in fact he's our fastest LBer. Why would you want another 2nd or 3rd rounder who would most likely never be as good as Barnett??? Draft picks are overrated (see Oakland/Randy Moss)
DakotaT
15 years ago


We don't need to trade Barnett. Our LB depth is what you need when you run a 3-4. Barnett is a great player, in fact he's our fastest LBer. Why would you want another 2nd or 3rd rounder who would most likely never be as good as Barnett??? Draft picks are overrated (see Oakland/Randy Moss)

"millertime" wrote:



I just don't like the guy. He talks the talk and when it's time to walk the walk, he blows the tackle and gives up the first down. Also, I think he is too light in the pants to blow up plays.
UserPostedImage
packersfan99
15 years ago
Chillar did a very good work, but i was surprised to see him starting, i thought Poppinga won that spot, nevertheless he did a fine job on the run and pass defense and getting the pressure to the Cutler.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
digsthepack
15 years ago
Eh....another waste of flesh in the Ted Thompson free agent cannon!

Ummmmmm...sarcasm.

We look pretty friggin incredible on defense, especially the LB play. Should be fun to watch as this unit comes together with more games under their belts. Do you figure Kevin Greene's influence on this group has been a positive one??
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Pack93z
15 years ago

Do you figure Kevin Greene's influence on this group has been a positive one??

"digsthepack" wrote:



Hell Yeah.. they were hitting til the final whistle.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Do you figure Kevin Greene's influence on this group has been a positive one??

"pack93z" wrote:



Hell Yeah.. they were hitting til the final whistle.

"digsthepack" wrote:



That man has me jumping around and tackling my pillow. I can't imagine what kind of effect he has on the players with his endless enthusiasm.

Very happy with Chillar. He's really showing some hidden talents. That's what you get when you sign a player from a vanilla defense like the Rams' was. He's been one of the better blitzers, so far. Liked him even in pre-season.
Pack93z
15 years ago
Anyone see a still photo of his leap over Wolfe?
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (29m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (30m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (30m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (37m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (38m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (59m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.