Zero2Cool
15 years ago
What do you think of this guy? He was somewhat of a no-name pick up in during the off-season just prior to the '08 season.

I wasn't impressed by the pick up. I was thinking, good, special teams demon and steady backup.

Now, I'm thinking the man needs to be on the field more. That leap over the RB and chasing down Cutler for the sack. One of the plays of the game.
UserPostedImage
gotarace
15 years ago
8 tackles.. 7 solo and a sack was fine first outing of the year for Brandon. I don't remember him looking so solid (built) last season...maybe our new strength trainer really helped him in the off season.
Smart As a Horse
Hung Like Einstein
azrunning
15 years ago
I was happy when we picked him up. Thought he'd be a great back up and could push to start. He's a playmaker.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Packers_Finland
15 years ago
To be fair, Chillar was the starting WLB of the Rams for a few years prior to us acquiring him via FA, so he wasn't a "no name" player. But, yeah, he has surprised and impressed me a lot.
This is a placeholder
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

To be fair, Chillar was the starting WLB of the Rams for a few years prior to us acquiring him via FA, so he wasn't a "no name" player. But, yeah, he has surprised and impressed me a lot.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Being a starter does not mean you're not a no name player, lol. 🙂 Umm, Ahmad Carroll? Tony Mandrich? Autwan Edwards? To just name a few.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
15 years ago
him and hawk were all over the field last night. very impressed
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Yerko
15 years ago
When he leaped the runningback and took down Cutler my brother stood up and said he is not human...that made me laugh.

I hope to see him on the field a little more and more as the season progresses.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
15 years ago
Who doesn't start singing a little modified rendition of MJ when Brandon makes a play?

CHillar....CHillar...... :rr:

Don't deny it you know you do!!!!!!!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Felipe7777777
15 years ago
haha i agree playing on the rams as a starter is no great feat....lol jk, but the dude can ball that is what i know after that leap i thought i was watching william henderson on D haha, it was just ridiculous
blank
masseyattack
15 years ago
Chillar has been the Packers' best linebacker since he got here - he's the best in coverage and quite possibly the best blitzer. He needs to start in my opinion, Thompson/McCarthy are just worried about the backlash if they bench the #5 overall pick A.J. Hawk.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (21m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (30m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (41m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.