If I had to select between Rodgers and Cutler, right now, and put one of them on a new team, a new franchise.
Easy, Rodgers. He's handled pressure superior to anything Cutler has (yes, I know Elway but Plummer got the worst of it) and he's handled it better. Cutler throws his players under the bus. Rodgers takes blame for everything bad. Rodgers makes a great throw, he says the WR made a good adjustment.
These things might seem small, petty, and what not. But I assure you, it makes the team around him WANT to go to war FOR him.
Rodgers also makes smarter decisions on the field and is far more accurate.
The NEAR three years starting, means diddly squat. Look at Alex Smith, what did that do for him? Did that improve his stock or did that ruin him? Most will say it ruined him as he would have benefited from sitting a year or two before starting.
Cutler has started 21 games more than Rodgers. Not 32 as the snippet implied.
In Cutlers second full year of starting, his stats were not better than Rodgers first year of starting. LESS overall TD's, MORE yards, MORE INT's, LESS sacks, MORE wins.
And Rodgers is a year younger than Cutler as well.
Rodgers has had several years of experience working with a talented QB head coach. And sat behind a future first ballot HoF'er.
Cutler, not so much.
Cutler has a bigger arm than Rodgers, but if you can't hit your target consistently, what value does that have?