wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
16 years ago

"Chew on that, Rodger's knob polishers....."

LOLOL What a fricken essay.

I am not a smart guy. But I do know this.... Be fricking original if you are going to try to write an essay on why Chico will fail. Come up with your own post. Your own thoughts.

It will do you no good in life to copy and post from another forum, change a few words and call it your own thoughts.

Be fricking original. I am sure you do have a mind of your own, try to use it. It will amaze you, what you can do with your own mind.

Then again, if it makes you happy to be un-original and a personality photo copy of someone who is a better blogger than you, so be it.

That is indeed your choice.

I am thinking that your younger brother was better at a great deal of things than you were. Perhaps your parents let you know that too often.

Just be frickin original. Go with the flow.

I wish you well in your personal development.

"RaiderPride" wrote:




RP you are being kinda hard on a guy "who has 40 applause points. So he must be doing something right". 😳 I know this because some time last week he reminded us of this. ::roll:
I figure the only way he gets 40 applause over night is to have 2 sign in names and come in as the other name and give himself the applause for the roddy name. :pukeleft: He was probably up till 2 AM giving himself a pat on the back. It was probably all bruised for the next few days.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago


If the Packers DO make the playoffs, will YOU admit it was the right move?

"Cheesey" wrote:



Cheesey, I understand why you're asking this question -- but you already know the answer, as does everyone else.

No, he won't admit that. No, he won't relent and congratulate Rodgers on a successful inaugural season, or Thompson on having compiled all this young talent, or McCarthy on coaching the kids up to such a surprising level.

IF he shows up after the Pack make the playoffs, he'll more likely claim that they'd never have gotten so far if Favre hadn't mentored Rodgers and helped lay the foundation for success. Or something similar -- he won't give credit where credit is due, because his concern isn't for the well-being of the Green Bay Packers. His only concern is being on the winning side of some internet argument -- all he wants is to be "right".

I'd say it's a fair bet that if the Packers do manage to make it into the playoffs, he and his ilk will be conspicuously absent from places like this one. And I'm okay with that.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have a seriously fun young team to watch. I think we'll be just fine.
blank
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I'd have to say the Packers offense does not look great under Rodgers. The passing game looks great, but the running game I feel is lacking.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
16 years ago

I'd have to say the Packers offense does not look great under Rodgers. The passing game looks great, but the running game I feel is lacking.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Grant should have been rested in week 2. Bad move by MM .

I think we'll see 70%+ passing against the Cows. Take advantage of their safeties.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dingus
16 years ago
AR 's running game looks good though!
blank
Cheesey
16 years ago

I'd have to say the Packers offense does not look great under Rodgers. The passing game looks great, but the running game I feel is lacking.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Yup!
But Rodgers has NO control over that. Anymore then Favre did.

Although like DINGUS!!!! DINGUS I SAY!!! said, Rodger's running looks good!
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
16 years ago


If the Packers DO make the playoffs, will YOU admit it was the right move?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Cheesey, I understand why you're asking this question -- but you already know the answer, as does everyone else.

No, he won't admit that. No, he won't relent and congratulate Rodgers on a successful inaugural season, or Thompson on having compiled all this young talent, or McCarthy on coaching the kids up to such a surprising level.

IF he shows up after the Pack make the playoffs, he'll more likely claim that they'd never have gotten so far if Favre hadn't mentored Rodgers and helped lay the foundation for success. Or something similar -- he won't give credit where credit is due, because his concern isn't for the well-being of the Green Bay Packers. His only concern is being on the winning side of some internet argument -- all he wants is to be "right".

I'd say it's a fair bet that if the Packers do manage to make it into the playoffs, he and his ilk will be conspicuously absent from places like this one. And I'm okay with that.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have a seriously fun young team to watch. I think we'll be just fine.

"Cheesey" wrote:


I know........he won't give props.
Here's what i see happening.
We win the Super Bowl by the score of 35-21, and Roddy then says "We would have won by a score of 49-14 if FAVRE would have been our QB!!!" :pottytrain1:
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
16 years ago


If the Packers DO make the playoffs, will YOU admit it was the right move?

"Cheesey" wrote:



Cheesey, I understand why you're asking this question -- but you already know the answer, as does everyone else.

No, he won't admit that. No, he won't relent and congratulate Rodgers on a successful inaugural season, or Thompson on having compiled all this young talent, or McCarthy on coaching the kids up to such a surprising level.

IF he shows up after the Pack make the playoffs, he'll more likely claim that they'd never have gotten so far if Favre hadn't mentored Rodgers and helped lay the foundation for success. Or something similar -- he won't give credit where credit is due, because his concern isn't for the well-being of the Green Bay Packers. His only concern is being on the winning side of some internet argument -- all he wants is to be "right".

I'd say it's a fair bet that if the Packers do manage to make it into the playoffs, he and his ilk will be conspicuously absent from places like this one. And I'm okay with that.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have a seriously fun young team to watch. I think we'll be just fine.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:


I know........he won't give props.
Here's what i see happening.
We win the Super Bowl by the score of 35-21, and Roddy then says "We would have won by a score of 49-14 if FAVRE would have been our QB!!!" :pottytrain1:

"Cheesey" wrote:




Cheesey you know that is not true. Brett would have int those two TD passes and ran them back for TD's. GB wins 63-0.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
16 years ago
+1 WPR!!!
LOLOL!!!
That was kind of what i was referring too.....i was wondering if anyone would catch it. See how i made the opponents SCORE lower when FAVRE was the QB? Like he could do something that would lower THEIR score!
UserPostedImage
WhiskeySam
16 years ago
Interesting to see how drunk most of us are over a 2-0 start against a pair of 0-2 teams that have glaring holes. If we beat Dallas this week, I'll believe this team is for real. The meat of our schedule is against the AFC/NFC Souths though. Those games are going to define this team more than the division games against teams we've owned for years.
Nemo me impune lacessit
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (3h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (3h) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (4h) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (4h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (4h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (4h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (4h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (4h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (4h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (5h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (7h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (7h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (7h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
    wpr (9-Apr) : yay
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
    Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
    Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
    Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    10 - 22
    Recent Topics
    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.