wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
16 years ago

"Chew on that, Rodger's knob polishers....."

LOLOL What a fricken essay.

I am not a smart guy. But I do know this.... Be fricking original if you are going to try to write an essay on why Chico will fail. Come up with your own post. Your own thoughts.

It will do you no good in life to copy and post from another forum, change a few words and call it your own thoughts.

Be fricking original. I am sure you do have a mind of your own, try to use it. It will amaze you, what you can do with your own mind.

Then again, if it makes you happy to be un-original and a personality photo copy of someone who is a better blogger than you, so be it.

That is indeed your choice.

I am thinking that your younger brother was better at a great deal of things than you were. Perhaps your parents let you know that too often.

Just be frickin original. Go with the flow.

I wish you well in your personal development.

"RaiderPride" wrote:




RP you are being kinda hard on a guy "who has 40 applause points. So he must be doing something right". 😳 I know this because some time last week he reminded us of this. ::roll:
I figure the only way he gets 40 applause over night is to have 2 sign in names and come in as the other name and give himself the applause for the roddy name. :pukeleft: He was probably up till 2 AM giving himself a pat on the back. It was probably all bruised for the next few days.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago


If the Packers DO make the playoffs, will YOU admit it was the right move?

"Cheesey" wrote:



Cheesey, I understand why you're asking this question -- but you already know the answer, as does everyone else.

No, he won't admit that. No, he won't relent and congratulate Rodgers on a successful inaugural season, or Thompson on having compiled all this young talent, or McCarthy on coaching the kids up to such a surprising level.

IF he shows up after the Pack make the playoffs, he'll more likely claim that they'd never have gotten so far if Favre hadn't mentored Rodgers and helped lay the foundation for success. Or something similar -- he won't give credit where credit is due, because his concern isn't for the well-being of the Green Bay Packers. His only concern is being on the winning side of some internet argument -- all he wants is to be "right".

I'd say it's a fair bet that if the Packers do manage to make it into the playoffs, he and his ilk will be conspicuously absent from places like this one. And I'm okay with that.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have a seriously fun young team to watch. I think we'll be just fine.
blank
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I'd have to say the Packers offense does not look great under Rodgers. The passing game looks great, but the running game I feel is lacking.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
16 years ago

I'd have to say the Packers offense does not look great under Rodgers. The passing game looks great, but the running game I feel is lacking.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Grant should have been rested in week 2. Bad move by Mike McCarthy .

I think we'll see 70%+ passing against the Cows. Take advantage of their safeties.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dingus
16 years ago
AR 's running game looks good though!
blank
Cheesey
16 years ago

I'd have to say the Packers offense does not look great under Rodgers. The passing game looks great, but the running game I feel is lacking.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Yup!
But Rodgers has NO control over that. Anymore then Favre did.

Although like DINGUS!!!! DINGUS I SAY!!! said, Rodger's running looks good!
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
16 years ago


If the Packers DO make the playoffs, will YOU admit it was the right move?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Cheesey, I understand why you're asking this question -- but you already know the answer, as does everyone else.

No, he won't admit that. No, he won't relent and congratulate Rodgers on a successful inaugural season, or Thompson on having compiled all this young talent, or McCarthy on coaching the kids up to such a surprising level.

IF he shows up after the Pack make the playoffs, he'll more likely claim that they'd never have gotten so far if Favre hadn't mentored Rodgers and helped lay the foundation for success. Or something similar -- he won't give credit where credit is due, because his concern isn't for the well-being of the Green Bay Packers. His only concern is being on the winning side of some internet argument -- all he wants is to be "right".

I'd say it's a fair bet that if the Packers do manage to make it into the playoffs, he and his ilk will be conspicuously absent from places like this one. And I'm okay with that.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have a seriously fun young team to watch. I think we'll be just fine.

"Cheesey" wrote:


I know........he won't give props.
Here's what i see happening.
We win the Super Bowl by the score of 35-21, and Roddy then says "We would have won by a score of 49-14 if FAVRE would have been our QB!!!" :pottytrain1:
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
16 years ago


If the Packers DO make the playoffs, will YOU admit it was the right move?

"Cheesey" wrote:



Cheesey, I understand why you're asking this question -- but you already know the answer, as does everyone else.

No, he won't admit that. No, he won't relent and congratulate Rodgers on a successful inaugural season, or Thompson on having compiled all this young talent, or McCarthy on coaching the kids up to such a surprising level.

IF he shows up after the Pack make the playoffs, he'll more likely claim that they'd never have gotten so far if Favre hadn't mentored Rodgers and helped lay the foundation for success. Or something similar -- he won't give credit where credit is due, because his concern isn't for the well-being of the Green Bay Packers. His only concern is being on the winning side of some internet argument -- all he wants is to be "right".

I'd say it's a fair bet that if the Packers do manage to make it into the playoffs, he and his ilk will be conspicuously absent from places like this one. And I'm okay with that.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have a seriously fun young team to watch. I think we'll be just fine.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:


I know........he won't give props.
Here's what i see happening.
We win the Super Bowl by the score of 35-21, and Roddy then says "We would have won by a score of 49-14 if FAVRE would have been our QB!!!" :pottytrain1:

"Cheesey" wrote:




Cheesey you know that is not true. Brett would have int those two TD passes and ran them back for TD's. GB wins 63-0.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
16 years ago
+1 WPR!!!
LOLOL!!!
That was kind of what i was referring too.....i was wondering if anyone would catch it. See how i made the opponents SCORE lower when FAVRE was the QB? Like he could do something that would lower THEIR score!
UserPostedImage
WhiskeySam
16 years ago
Interesting to see how drunk most of us are over a 2-0 start against a pair of 0-2 teams that have glaring holes. If we beat Dallas this week, I'll believe this team is for real. The meat of our schedule is against the AFC/NFC Souths though. Those games are going to define this team more than the division games against teams we've owned for years.
Nemo me impune lacessit
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (34m) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (34m) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Rude!
beast (4h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (10h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (12h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
32m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.