WR combos that strike fear in NFL defenses

Pack93z
Select Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

A grossly low ranking in my opinion.. but it should cool some of the notion that we are the best either...

Top Reciever Combos...

8. PACKERS

Even if Brett Favre does come back to play with Green Bay's bitter rivals in Minnesota, he won't have as many weapons as his former backup Aaron Rodgers will for the Packers. Expect to hear "Rodgers to Jennings" about 80-90 times per year for the next half-decade or so, especially now that the Packers' leading receiver is proud owner of a new contract extension. Favre's old buddy Donald Driver still has life in his legs, and plenty in his big-game heart. And "A-Rodge" has excellent young backup targets in Nelson, Jones and Martin. Pencil Rodgers in for several more 4,000-yard seasons with this group.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

I don't know if we should be ranked that low, but I do think that the Cardinals should NOT be 1.

Their top 3 are the main talent, while the rest of them are average.

I think the Bills' WR's are better than the Cardinals IMO. Maybe even the Patriots.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

1 to 10 scale
Greg Jennings 9
Donald Driver 8
James Jones 8
Jordy Nelson 6
Ruvell Martin 6

I'd give Fitz an Anquan 10's each

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

Keep in mind that this includes TEs, though. Don't want to start another TE fight like the one's that going on in another thread, but I think that that's pulling us down quite badly.

I still think that the Jags should've gone with Crabtree, but that's mostly because of selfish reasons. Monroe would've been a huge steal at 9.

IronMan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

8th is about right.

Dulak
Veteran Member

15 years ago

I dont mind the pack not having that great TEs ... as long as we have nice fullbacks and WR - thats good enough for me.

Dont we have a new TE that looked like he was making some progress?

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Interesting about the Bills, my neighbor is a huge Bills fan and he is telling me they are like 6 deep at wr. I would have to agree with him. But i think our problem is the big drop off from #2 wr to the #3 wr. And why did the author even mention Martin lol

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Greg C.
Registered

15 years ago

"go.pack.go." wrote:

If your top three are as good as theirs, it matters very little who is at #4 and below.

I think the Steelers are ranked too low, while the Chargers are ranked too high.

blank

musccy
Veteran Member

15 years ago

I don't agree with how low they have steelers and packers, and how high broncos and chargers are. These lists look at the sexy attention grabbing names for 90% of their analysis, and the packers just aren't that.

When AR throws for over 4k, and DD, and GJ each have 70+ receptions, and JJ and JN each have 40+ none of us will care about a dumb foxnews list.

CaliforniaCheez
Member

15 years ago

#10

Only the Cardinals and Saints have a chance at being ahead of the
Packers.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (3h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (3h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (4h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (4h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (5h) : Who? What?

beast (13h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (18h) : meh

Zero2Cool (22h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (22h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (22h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24