Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
This guy expresses my feelings about the pointlessness of hero worship pretty closely. Whether they choose to have the public persona of a baby face like The Rock or a heel like Edge, at the end of the day they're still mercenaries. Sometimes I wish I could get caught up in the hero worship like some of you, but for some weird reason it's just not in my personality.

I'd rather put this article in General -- in my opinion, it's only tangentially about Favre -- but it mentions Favre so much that it would spark a Favre discussion, so I'm putting it here.

Ego trip to absurd circus  

Posted: Jun. 13, 2009

Mark Hoffman

Whenever someone philosophizes about "things happening for a reason," it's a good bet they're not talking about something as incidental as the entertainment biz. No one, for example, mentions that it was destined for Paul to leave the Beatles so that the world might be enriched by his solo work.

Even though pro sports fall under the same diversionary big top, maybe there is something meaningful that will come from the ongoing Brett Favre circus after all.

If one more person could be steered away from hero worship because of this farcical theater, then all the divisiveness and minor annoyances of the last year were worthwhile.

First, let it be reiterated that Favre should be free to work for as long as anyone will pay him and for whatever organization that will have him, the Minnesota Vikings included. Let the Vikings dispatch their expeditionary force to south Mississippi this week to poke, prod and otherwise determine if an aging quarterback is still fit to play a brutally relentless young man's game.

But also remember how Favre has revealed his character throughout this mildly amusing episode.

Remember how he flew into Green Bay last summer in one of the most egocentric stunts ever pulled by a professional athlete. Remember how it was his intention all along to play for the Vikings after his first retirement. And remember how he began to distance himself from his teammates by dressing in a private chamber, away from the locker room.

This isn't to say that Favre suddenly became evil incarnate. He is the same person he's always been, neither saint nor sinner, just a guy looking out, as most of us would, for his own best interests while trying to hang on in a ruthless industry. Not the interests of a team that did the right thing by accepting his word at his retirement and moving on. And he certainly did not have your interests at heart.

But as a paying customer, your only obligation was to buy the ticket and take the three-hour ride. While Favre was overly mythologized - and the media bears responsibility here - at the end of the day he was not a whole lot more than Will Ferrell throwing footballs. Any further emotional investment, such as placing a highly paid entertainer on a Mother Teresa-type pedestal, ran the risk of inviting pointless feelings, such as the rage that now exists toward a football player who apparently wants to be identified with a brand marketed as the archenemy.

And that's all the sermonizing that needs to be done on that topic, other than this:

If Favre wants to play for the Vikings because they have a scary good defense and a freak-of-nature running back, and if he truly believes he can somehow stay within himself to become that final piece to get them to the Super Bowl, then more power to him.

But if his driving motivation is to stick it to Ted Thompson, such an impulse would be misplaced and pathetic beyond reason, sort of like the way Warren Spahn ended his Hall of Fame career in New York and San Francisco.

Either way, should Favre decide to further risk his dignity and legacy by dragging himself back on the field with Minnesota, he would do so without the heroic illusions that accompanied his 16 seasons in Green Bay. And there would be the good in crossing over, because if anyone didn't know it by now, these are just guys, most of whom don't play for altruistic reasons.


UserPostedImage
dd80forever
15 years ago
Funny stuff


Let Brett worry about his legacy.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Huh? this has nothing to do with Favre's legacy. The message of this column is that the joke is on people who are too wrapped up emotionally in this, because they're projecting on sports stars an aura and mystique that isn't and shouldn't be there.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
I have to admit that I am guilty of being emotionally wrapped up: I am beyond annoyed by the people who have so idolized Favre that they feel obligated to shit on the Packers at any opportunity. I don't want him to play in Minnesota simply because I'm tired of hearing these people squawk. I'd rather just sit back and enjoy the team we have.
UserPostedImage
Gravedigga
15 years ago

Funny stuff


Let Brett worry about his legacy.

"dd80forever" wrote:



Thank you. Who is this Mark Murphy? Mike Florio's lap blowup doll? I mean Mark Hoffman.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Gravedigga
15 years ago

Huh? this has nothing to do with Favre's legacy. The message of this column is that the joke is on people who are too wrapped up emotionally in this, because they're projecting on sports stars an aura and mystique that isn't and shouldn't be there.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Um, the writer would not have a job if people did nto do that. Because people "love Favre", "love Jennings, Rodgers, Driver, Woodson, Harris, Collins, etc". That is why this guy even has a job. I think this writer is wrapped up in the "aura" of his own writing because nobody else is. Seriously, the easiest way for some no name journalist who nobody ever heard of and nobody cares about is to attack one of the most loved sports figures ever(Favre). Make sense?
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Eh. One more time: He isn't attacking Favre. He's attacking star worship. He's using the Favre situation as a vehicle for discussing a much broader issue.
UserPostedImage
Gravedigga
15 years ago

Eh. One more time: He isn't attacking Favre. He's attacking star worship. He's using the Favre situation as a vehicle for discussing a much broader issue.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



The idiot is attacking Favre. How many times does he mention Favres name? How many times does he mention any other players name? Thank you. also, i stick by my guns that he is a nobody writer who is trying to get his name out there by trying to dig up some more Favre mud.

And star worship is the only reason these guys have these huge contracts. Albert Haynesworth would be making 150k per year if not for star worship instead of the 15 million hes gonna pull in per season. Same for Brady, Moss, Manning, the list goes on. What the hell is this guy talking about. He'd be living in his moms basement pretending to be a writer if not for star worship.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
So your only argument against what he has to say is an ad hominem attack?

I do agree that if it weren't for star worship, he wouldn't have a job. But that doesn't undermine the truth (if any) of his central thesis. If anything, it would seem to accentuate the courage of his stance, which, if heeded by the general public, would render him and his colleagues essentially irrelevant.
UserPostedImage
Gravedigga
15 years ago

So your only argument against what he has to say is an ad hominem attack?

I do agree that if it weren't for star worship, he wouldn't have a job. But that doesn't undermine the truth (if any) of his central thesis.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I replied to the substance of his article. It's a ridiculous argument because without "hero worship" or "star worship" there would be no such thing as professional sports and without prof sports, he'd have nothing to write about. Get it? I really hope i'm not coming off as argumentative vs you because this is just how i try and get my points across. No offense.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (2h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (2h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (2h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (3h) : Who? What?
beast (12h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (16h) : meh
Zero2Cool (20h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (20h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (20h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.