Stevetarded
15 years ago
TE is a hard one because the Vikings and Bears both use their guy as another receiver running more routes and such where we use Donald Lee as a blocker/hands guy. I personally like Lee the best he also was 8th in the NFl last year in passes caught/ times thrown to. That's out of all WR/RBs also. Besides that I think Shianco is better than Olsen also
blank
Stevetarded
15 years ago
I'm gonna treat this as a 4-3 defense

QB- Packers, Bears, Lions, Vikings

RB- Vikings, Lions, Bears, Packers (I think GB has better depth than the Bears but Grant was pretty bad last year so I'll just leave it as is until he improves.)

FB- Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions (TBH I know little about this position on the other teams)

WR- Packers, Lions, Vikings, Bears

TE- Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions

OT- Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions

OG- Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions

OC- Packers, Bears, Lions, Vikings

DT- Vikings, Bears, Packers, Lions

DE- Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions

OLB- Lions, Bears, Vikings, Packers

MLB/ILB- Bears, Packers, Vikings, Lions

CB- Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions

S- Packers, Vikings, Lions, Bears

K- Lions, Bears, Vikings, Packers

P- Vikings, Bears, Lions, Packers

QB and Defensive Line have the greatest importance in the division IMO
blank
mi_keys
15 years ago

some great posts so far but one part i would disagree on are the lbers. I would ranked the lions #1 with Simms, Petersen, and Foote but thats just me. The lions have done so much to help their team this year i don't know who they all have. They just added an o-lineman in Jansen so their line could be good also.

"dhazer" wrote:



I forgot about Peterson. That could be quite the linebacking corps. Linebackers were one of the hardest for me to rank given the movement of the Packers to a 3-4 and the acquisitions made by the Lions and Bears. The Lions line though was so shit last year I'd have a hard time seeing one player making it decent.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
With all due respect, anyone who ranks the Vikings' quarterback situation, even (or particularly) with Favre at the helm, above that of the Packers and Bears is borderline delusional, in my opinion. :P

Given that the ranking to which I'm referring may be a typo (based on said poster's opinions expressed in another thread), I won't call anyone out. :magnifyglass:
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
15 years ago

With all due respect, anyone who ranks the Vikings' quarterback situation, even (or particularly) with Favre at the helm, above that of the Packers and Bears is borderline delusional, in my opinion. :P

Given that the ranking to which I'm referring may be a typo (based on said poster's opinions expressed in another thread), I won't call anyone out. :magnifyglass:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Only one was me unless I missed one, lol. I've been intentionally harsh on the Packers in several cases. The two largest of which are I haven't really given us credit for Kampman's potential in our new defense and I'm trying to keep my ranking of Rodgers in check. In my opinion, last year Rodgers played the best out of any quarterback currently or potentially in the not to distant future in the NFC North. I expect him to continue to develop into one of the top quarterbacks of the NFL but for ranking purposes now I'm very much keeping in mind that he's only had one year of starting experience. On a side note, I'm also confident in Kampman adjusting nicely to the 3-4.
Born and bred a cheesehead
porky88
15 years ago
QB- Packers, Bears, Lions, Vikings

The Packers and Bears are very close. Honestly, I don't think you can separate the two right now. I'll take Project Stafford over Project Tarvaris right now. If Favre comes back, Vikings move to No. 3.

RB- Vikings, Bears, Packers, Lions

Vikings easily No. 1. Bears and Packers closer than people think, but Forte is a more complete back than Grant so he gets the slight nod. Kevin Smith and the Lions a distant fourth.

WR- Packers, Lions, Vikings, Bears

Packers easily No. 1 in the division at receiver. Calvin Johnson alone makes the Lions No. 2. Vikings and Bears have some of the worst receiving cores in football.

TE- Bears, Packers, Lions, Vikings

I think Greg Olsen is the best TE in the division. I also like Desmond Clark some. Green Bay isn't bad with Donald Lee. Detroit has Pettigrew to takeover this year and we'll see how that goes. Minnesota finishes last, but not far off.

OT- Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions

Packers drop to No. 2 this year with the loss of Mark Tauscher. Minnesota not much better than Green Bay and Chicago. All three have problems at RT and aging LT's. Detroit not sitting well at tackle in my view.

OG- Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions

Vikings easily the top one here lead by Steve Hutchinson. The rest are pretty weak. GB slight edge over Chicago and Detroit.

OC - Bears, Lions, Packers, Vikings

I still like Krutz more than anyone else's. Raola is next. I'll take Spitz or Wells over Sullivan in Minnesota. He has big shoes to replace.

DT- Vikings, Bears, Packers, Lions

Hard to compare everyone now that GB is moving to the 3-4. Clearly, Minnesota is No. 1. Chicago is No. 2, but they're interior line has regressed. Green Bay has a lot of potential, but No. 3 until we see what Raji can do. Detroit is last again.

DE - Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions

Vikings lead by Jared Allen are No. 1 again. Green Bay is No. 2 with a lot of interesting options. Chicago has an overrated trio that are on decline. Detroit has pretty much nothing. Cliff Avril is a nice building block at least.

OLB- Bears, Lions, Packers, Vikings

Bears take the top spot because Briggs is one of the best in the game. Detroit adding Julian Peterson puts them at No. 2. Green Bay is No. 3 with Kampman leading the way. Minnesota is last, but they got a good tandem in Greenway and Leber. This might be the strongest position in the division.

MLB/ILB- Vikings, Bears, Packers, Lions

E.J. Henderson has surpassed Brian Urlacher in my view. Green Bay is sitting with two projects in Barnett and Hawk in the 3-4. Foote is a stop gap player in Detroit.

CB - Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions

Packers are clearly No. 1. I think GB has the best tandem in football actually. Minnesota is next with the Pro Bowl Antonie Winfield and respectable Cedric Griffin. Chicago has issues at corner and Detroit has a lot of issues at corner.

S- Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions

I like GB because Nick Collins is a playmaker. Bigby isn't great, but we'll see what he brings this year. Williams isn't living up to his contract in Minnesota. I do think Tyrell Johnson is going to be a nice player though. Chicago has issues. I expect Daniel Manning to play safety and do it well. I liked the Louis Delmas pick in Detroit.

K- Lions, Vikings, Bears, Packers

Jason Hansen is the best. He's a Pro Bowl kicker in my view. Just overlooked because he played for Detroit all these years. Longwell is pretty clutch himself. Gould isn't bad. Crosby should get better.Good set of kickers.

P- Vikings, Bears, Lions, Packers

Can't say I'm a punter expert within the division. I'll say that Minnesota is the best with Kluwe. Maynard isn't bad in Chicago. Detroit's Nick Harris has been decent. Green Bay's punting situation has been a mess since Josh Bidwell left.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Holy crap Porky, that's an awesome list!
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago
Yeah, I agree with most of what you wrote. Pretty obvious, as our lists look a lot alike. It's just that you don't have any ties at all.

One thing I'm wondering about though, how can you rate the ILBs and OLBs if they play in a different system? I wonder how you rated Kampman, who I rated as a DE, as an OLB if you compare him to a player like Briggs or Greenway?

And I wonder why everyone thinks that Kevin Smith is such a bad runner. If you look at the rest of their offense, he had quite the season. He might not've rushed for a 1000 yards, but he has a better average than Grant and he rusher for just 300 yards less behind an O-line that as leak as a basket and virtually no passing game for most of the season.
Dulak
15 years ago
ya I agree with most of what porky said also
dd80forever
15 years ago
I'd like to take this to the Bears and Vikings boards to see how it differs
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
26m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.