OTA depth chart. · PACKERSHOME

earthquake
Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

Alright, so its way too soon to do this, but it should be fun. I've come up with what i think the depth chart is/should be as of OTAs, i've ignored some injured players(and players who arent at OTAs as well). Most of this is based on JSO's reporting on who has been lining up where, as long as what we know from last season.

I'm pretty sure i have everyone lined up at the correct positions, as long with everyone onsides this time too =)
Starts of course on top, with 2nd team on bottom.


                                            Collins
                                             Smith
            Bigby 
            Rouse

                              Barnett    Hawk  
                Thompson      Chillar   Bishop     Kampmon
                Mathews                           Poppinga

Woodson              Jenkins        Picket        Raji       Harris
Williams             Harrell         Raji        Jolly      Blackmon


Driver    Lee    Clifton  Colledge  Spitz  Sitton  Barbe   Jennings   
Nelson  Finley   Maredith  Preston  Wells  Wells   Lang    Jones

                                    Rodgers
                                    Flynn



                               Grant    Johnson
                              Jackson    Kuhn

blank

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

I'm not sure Quinn will be starting at FB. I hope he does though

blank

porky88
Veteran Member

15 years ago

I think Matthews will surpass Thompson sooner rather than later.

I also think Lang will pass Barbre and I also think Quinn Johnson is going to start at FB. I think they touted him as their starter before they even drafted him.

http://www.row12.com/

beast
Select Member

15 years ago

I agree with you mostly earthquake. But I don't see Wells at OG.

Giacomini will get a shot at RT before Lang.

I could see Johnson starting by game 1... but I don't see him starting at OTA. I don't think rookies should start at OTA.

And I think Hall would be ahead of Kuhn.

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

I certainly hope that the give Giacomini a look and put Lang behind Sitton on the official depth chart. I mean, he should be coming along quite well now. Hopefully somewhere along the lines of a Jason Peters. Although that is a lot to ask for. Just look at this piece from last year.

Compares To: TYSON CLABO-Atlanta...Like the up-and-coming Clabo, Giacomini is still a work in progress and might need a year or two before he can contribute. But it is evident that he is a rare athlete with good speed and a developing frame. Put him in the weight room for a year, work on his zone blocking technique and along with his quickness, you could unearth a solid right tackle with good reach blocking skills. He's certainly worth a long look, as few tackles have his athletic ability. It is just experience and technique that he is lacking...Had a pre-game incident vs. Kentucky that leads to some questions about his maturity.

I also don't think that Pickett will slide into an only back-up spot when he loses the battle for NT. I see him and Raji switching between NT and DE. Something like they're doing with Ngata in Baltimore.

One last thing that I'm hoping for is that Lee has beaten out Blackmon for the nr. 4 corner spot. He has to show some progression in my eyes. He doesn't have to be an amazing corner or something just yet, but I'd like to see him beat out Blackmon at least.

Bigbyfan
Member

15 years ago

I know this isn't an "impact change" but I think Brohm beats out Flynn for the #2 QB spot. He is more talented than Flynn and he has an offseason to learn the system.

I want our two FB to be Johnson and Hall. I am still upset with Kuhn for not being able to get that 1 yard into the endzone at the end of a game. I can't remember who we were playing. (probably panthers?) We had to settle for a FG and we end up losing obviously.

blank

beast
Select Member

15 years ago

"Rockmolder" wrote:

I think Pickett will win the NT because Raji has a lot to learn still IMO.

I think this is the perfect system for Blackmon so I think he'll get better.

I know this isn't an "impact change" but I think Brohm beats out Flynn for the #2 QB spot. He is more talented than Flynn and he has an offseason to learn the system.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:

from what's being reported it sounds like Brohm is still having problems.

But remember Rodgers look like he sucked the first two years .... who knows Brohm the next Rodgers?

earthquake
Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

"Rockmolder" wrote:

I think the DL rotation will consist of picket, raji, jolly, harrel, jenkins and one more guy(perhaps wynn, considering how they like to hold onto their draft picks). And i think we'll see most of these guys rotating in at multiple positions. With Picket, Raji and Jolly(in that order) seeing some time at NT, and all 6 seeing time at DE. To me this looks like a very strong rotation if everyone stays healthy. I think they also stash one or two of the more unknown NT type players on the roster on the PS.

As far as Lee goes, i would love to see him surpass Blackmon, but he seemed very raw last year. We'll have to see how that plays out, really i'm just glad that there are 5 guys who will see playing time at corner before bush.

Sorry if i was a little confusing with the nature of the thread, but what i meant to represent was what i thought the starting lineup will be on opening day, based on what has happened in OTAs. Not so much the OTA depth chart as it is now. I will probably update this every once in a while as things progress through training camp.

blank

mkapp
Registered

15 years ago

Its early and they are experimenting with things, but Finley is 1st team?

earthquake
Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#10

You're right, there hasnt really been anything to support that, i just hope he shows a lot of improvement and takes over the starting job, but really there isnt anything that would suggest he's done that yet, so edited.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (2h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (2h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (3h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (3h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (4h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (4h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (7h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (7h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (7h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (7h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (7h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (7h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (7h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (7h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (7h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (7h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (7h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (7h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (8h) : Packers will get in

beast (8h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS