Rockmolder
15 years ago

Ahman Green was not appreciated by some, I feel. Those who claim he was not an elite back I think are sadly mistaken. He could run, catch, block, he was the man during his prime. That was one helluva good move by Sherman.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Who the heck said he wasn't an elite back? Whoever said that is now on my idiot list.

In terms of fantasy football (yes, fantasy football matters for RB production), he was #3 in 2001 and #3 in 2003. He was #3 in '01 and '03 in total yards from scrimmage. He got 20 TDs in '03, which was 2nd in the NFL (for any position). He was a Pro Bowler in '01, '02, '03, and '04. He was a damn good screen back.

Geez, I guess some people smoke too much crack. Anyone who would be disappointed in that much production in 4 years for a RB is an idiot. Realistically, the life expectancy of a RB is very short. He's 29th all-time in career rushing yards, which is pretty impressive.

"SlickVision" wrote:



I agree. He's actually one of the reasons I became a Packer fan over another team.

The one thing you can complain about, I guess, are his fumbles. He fumbled 7 times, of which we lost possesion 5 times, in his 1800 yard season. 6 time in a 1200 yard season and 7 times again in another 1200 yard season.

Still, he was an amazing back. It's a shame that he wasn't used the first 2 years and declined so horribly fast when he did.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Ahman Green was not appreciated by some, I feel. Those who claim he was not an elite back I think are sadly mistaken. He could run, catch, block, he was the man during his prime. That was one helluva good move by Sherman.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Who the heck said he wasn't an elite back? Whoever said that is now on my idiot list.

In terms of fantasy football (yes, fantasy football matters for RB production), he was #3 in 2001 and #3 in 2003. He was #3 in '01 and '03 in total yards from scrimmage. He got 20 TDs in '03, which was 2nd in the NFL (for any position). He was a Pro Bowler in '01, '02, '03, and '04. He was a damn good screen back.

Geez, I guess some people smoke too much crack. Anyone who would be disappointed in that much production in 4 years for a RB is an idiot. Realistically, the life expectancy of a RB is very short. He's 29th all-time in career rushing yards, which is pretty impressive.

"SlickVision" wrote:



I can't recall who, but I think it was on this website here somewhere it was said that Ahman Green wasn't that good or shouldn't be considered elite.

As per someone elses argument about fumbles. Check his fumbles per carry. Compare that to the rest of the NFL during those times.


edit, Career.
Carries 2015
Fumbles 35 (1 fumble : 57 carries)
Fumbles lost 23 ( 1 fumble lost : 87 carries)
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago

Ahman Green was not appreciated by some, I feel. Those who claim he was not an elite back I think are sadly mistaken. He could run, catch, block, he was the man during his prime. That was one helluva good move by Sherman.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Who the heck said he wasn't an elite back? Whoever said that is now on my idiot list.

In terms of fantasy football (yes, fantasy football matters for RB production), he was #3 in 2001 and #3 in 2003. He was #3 in '01 and '03 in total yards from scrimmage. He got 20 TDs in '03, which was 2nd in the NFL (for any position). He was a Pro Bowler in '01, '02, '03, and '04. He was a damn good screen back.

Geez, I guess some people smoke too much crack. Anyone who would be disappointed in that much production in 4 years for a RB is an idiot. Realistically, the life expectancy of a RB is very short. He's 29th all-time in career rushing yards, which is pretty impressive.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I can't recall who, but I think it was on this website here somewhere it was said that Ahman Green wasn't that good or shouldn't be considered elite.

As per someone elses argument about fumbles. Check his fumbles per carry. Compare that to the rest of the NFL during those times.


edit, Career.
Carries 2015
Fumbles 35 (1 fumble : 57 carries)
Fumbles lost 23 ( 1 fumble lost : 87 carries)

"SlickVision" wrote:



Hah. Ryan Grant couldn't carry Ahman Green's jockstrap. Ted should have mentioned that to him during the contract negotiations.

Ted: "I have seen Ahman Green run the football sir. I know Ahman Green. You sir, are no Ahman Green."

You know, kinda like this:

Senator, you are no Jack Kennedy 

...shoulda seen the back strokin' young Dan feebly attempted on that day.

Tom Brokaw: Senator Quayle, I don't mean to beat this drum until it has no more sound in it. But to follow up on Brit Hume's question, when you said that it was a hypothetical situation, it is, sir, after all, the reason that we're here tonight, because you are running not just for Vice President (Applause) and if you cite the experience that you had in Congress, surely you must have some plan in mind about what you would do if it fell to you to become President of the United States, as it has to so many Vice Presidents just in the last 25 years or so.
Quayle: Let me try to answer the question one more time. I think this is the fourth time that I've had this question.
Brokaw: The third time.
Quayle: Three times that I've had this question and I will try to answer it again for you, as clearly as I can, because the question you are asking is, "What kind of qualifications does Dan Quayle have to be president," "What kind of qualifications do I have," and "What would I do in this kind of a situation?" And what would I do in this situation? [...] I have far more experience than many others that sought the office of vice president of this country. I have as much experience in the Congress as Jack Kennedy did when he sought the presidency. I will be prepared to deal with the people in the Bush administration, if that unfortunate event would ever occur.
Judy Woodruff: Senator [Bentsen]?
Bentsen: Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy: I knew Jack Kennedy; Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy. (Prolonged shouts and applause.) What has to be done in a situation like that is to call in the
Woodruff: Please, please, once again you are only taking time away from your own candidate.
Quayle: That was really uncalled for, Senator. (Shouts and applause.)
Bentsen: You are the one that was making the comparison, Senator and I'm one who knew him well. And frankly I think you are so far apart in the objectives you choose for your country that I did not think the comparison was well-taken.




That was a smack-down...one of the best ever. And I'm a republican, for the record.


Anybody that says Ahman Green wasn't the absolute shit in his prime apparently never watched him play.
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago
Let's not underestimate the talent around Green, namely on the O-line.

The continuity was tremendous, and frankly we had 4 pro-bowl offensive linemen clearing paths for Green.

Not to undermine Green by any means, but our current o-line is not even in the same ball park when it comes to that offensive line (albeit scheme doesn't help our O-line much, seemingly).
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Let's not underestimate the talent around Green, namely on the O-line.

The continuity was tremendous, and frankly we had 4 pro-bowl offensive linemen clearing paths for Green.

Not to undermine Green by any means, but our current o-line is not even in the same ball park when it comes to that offensive line (albeit scheme doesn't help our O-line much, seemingly).

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



I'm on THIS side of the fence, now THIS side of the fence! Don't under estimate the talent around Green, don't underestimate Green's talent ... c'mon!

I think we derailed the shit out of this thread. I don't think Green is going to be on the roster this year.

I'm all for ...
Grant
Jackson
Wynn
Lumpkin
Johnson

if we keep 5.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago
^ We'll to be fair, talking of Green can contribute to our current RB situation.

Green had the o-line, and was in a scheme that played to his talents. He was a great player, but those things made him a real playmaker. Grant showed shades of that in his first year, but last year... yeah no.

Perhaps the key to our RB situation is tweaking the scheme? Can Jackson and Wynn even play in a more man-blocking run scheme? Jackson developed in the ZBS in Nebraska, so perhaps he's real limited in that way?

McCarthy talks about scheme development and the like ... perhaps he needs to develop a scheme that better puts Grant in a position to succeed?

Personally, I think Grant can succeed in the ZBS - he just needs a path to get to the second level.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
packersfan101101
15 years ago

Note how Pelissero avoided mentioning Brandon Jackson's yards per carry (5.5) because he wanted to make him look bad. This is what drives me nuts about these writers sometimes. I agree with PackFanWithTwins that Jackson should be used way more than he was last season. I also agree that less ZBS would be a good thing.

"Greg C." wrote:



Yea i agree thats ridiculus, Brandon Jackson is much better then the write makes him sound and in my opinion he should be the starter. In Grant you have someone who will just repeatedly run up the middle and is no threat in the passing game, but in jackson you have someone who can go up the middle but also bounce outside and and make some people miss. Also he is a threat in the passing game.
brandon jackson is amazing
zombieslayer
15 years ago



Yea i agree thats ridiculus, Brandon Jackson is much better then the write makes him sound and in my opinion he should be the starter. In Grant you have someone who will just repeatedly run up the middle and is no threat in the passing game, but in jackson you have someone who can go up the middle but also bounce outside and and make some people miss. Also he is a threat in the passing game.

"packersfan101101" wrote:



I wouldn't go as far as say Jackson should start over Grant. However, in an offensive scheme I would run, we'd see probably 60/40 Grant/Jackson.

I am anti-run, unless you have an elite back. We do not have an elite back.

In the WCO, you can get by with a mediocre RB and still win SB after SB. Can anyone name the starting RB on all five of the 49er SB teams? I live in San Francisco and I can't. Heck, we didn't even have a 900 yard rusher when we won the SB.

Jackson brings more diversity. He's more a WCO back. With Grant, you have no screen threat. You know he's going to get the ball and run up the middle for 3.9 yards a carry. Big deal.

Grant is tough though, and can carry a good workload. I was happy with him in '07 but the drop off was significant and he better show some improvement in '08.

Yes, our OL is mediocre, but Grant holding out for more money and getting more money, he better produce.

More importantly, Jackson is more WCO, and we are a WCO team, like it or not. Jackson MAY be a better long-term fit. We will see in 2009.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Dulak
15 years ago
wynn had some good runs in 07 too from what I saw
zombieslayer
15 years ago

wynn had some good runs in 07 too from what I saw

"Dulak" wrote:



Wynn is a very talented kid. Problem with him is upstairs. If he gets his head together, he could be a decent RB.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
wpr (11h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
4h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.