wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
My turn.

Link 


Thursday, May 21, 2009
Packers by position: Offensive line
Each weekday until the Packers open organized team activity (OTA) practices on May 27, the Press-Gazettes Tom Pelissero breaks down the roster at another position and gives his (extremely) preliminary thoughts on who will make the cut. Agree? Disagree? Voice your thoughts via Twitter.

Day 4: Offensive line.

On the roster: C Scott Wells, C/G Jason Spitz, C/G Duke Preston, G Nevin McCaskill, G Josh Sitton, G/C Evan Dietrich-Smith, G/T T.J. Lang, G/T Daryn Colledge, G/T Allen Barbre, G/T Andrew Hartline, T Dane Randolph, T Jamon Meredith, T Chad Clifton, T Breno Giacomini, T/G Tony Moll.

How many theyll keep: 8 or 9.

Best guess (*=starter): LT Clifton*, LG Colledge*, C Spitz*, RG Sitton*, RT Giacomini*, Lang, Preston, Barbre, Meredith.

Breakdown: The Packers once again enter offseason practices with uncertainty at multiple offensive line spots but where those holes are is the difference.
The only spots that can be regarded as locked down are left tackle, where Clifton returns a 10th season, and left guard, where Colledge settled in last season and played the best of anyone on the line.
Clifton (6-5, 320) turns 33 next month, is coming off surgery to clean up both knees and had one horrible game last season in a loss at Minnesota. Hes due close to $6.4 million in total compensation in this, the last year of his contract, and has a monster salary-cap number of $8,034,170. But the Packers arent lacking for cap space and have no clear successor for Clifton, who remains a top pass-blocking left tackle despite the wear and tear and figures to finish his deal while the Packers develop young players behind him.
Colledge (6-4, 308) has played some at right tackle, but his play last year convinced the Packers he belongs at guard and theyve had at least preliminary talks with his agent about extending his contract, which expires after this season.
Wells (6-2, 303) has been a full-time starter since 2006 but dealt with persistent injuries the past two seasons, giving Spitz (6-3, 302) chances to show his best position might be center. They likely will split reps throughout offseason practices and the early stages of training camp. If Spitz wins the job, the Packers might look to unload Wells, whose $1.85 million in total compensation would be high for a backup center, particularly since Preston was brought in to back up all three interior spots.
Sitton (6-3, 317), a fourth-round pick last year, probably would have started as a rookie if not for a knee injury. He held up fairly well in limited action but must gain confidence to exploit his size and mean streak on the play side.
The biggest question is at right tackle, where unrestricted free agent Mark Tauscher has started since 2000. Unless the Packers re-sign Tauscher at this point, it seems unlikely, as he continues to work his way back from ACL reconstruction the job figures to be decided in a competition between Giacomini, Barbre and perhaps the rookie Lang and Moll, who was benched after two starts at right tackle last December.
Giacomini (6-7, 311), a nasty fifth-round pick in 2008 who made big strides with the scout team as a rookie, would be the clear favorite if he werent coming off ankle surgery that has sidelined him for much of the offseason program.
Barbre (6-4, 305) is another mean guy and played tackle in college, but he is coming off a disappointing second season and has worked almost exclusively on the left side.
Coaches have indicated Lang (6-4, 316) will get a look at multiple spots during OTAs he worked at right tackle and left guard during rookie camp this month and might be better-suited to play inside. But with a position so wide open, theres no ruling out the rookie from Eastern Michigan if he performs well in training camp and the preseason.
Moll (6-5, 306) is entering his fourth season a key evaluation point for a guy who only played one college season on the line after moving from tight end. But he might end up competing with Preston for a multi-positional backup role more than competing for a starting job.
Preston (6-5, 316) played in 59 games, starting 20, over four seasons in Buffalo. His contract (two years, $2 million, including a $150,000 roster bonus) doesnt make him a lock, but his versatility and playing experience make him a decent bet to earn a backup role.
Likewise, Meredith (6-5, 304) cant be considered a lock, but his physical tools and ability to play left tackle made him a value pick in the fifth round. He worked at left tackle in rookie camp and probably will keep getting work there, behind Clifton.
McCaskill (6-4, 315) was a late-season signing off Philadelphias practice squad and will have a hard time returning to the 53-man roster.
Idaho States Dietrich-Smith (6-2, 305), Marylands Randolph (6-5, 300) and Central Michigans Hartline (6-5, 297) are long shots as undrafted rookies. Randolph is a freakish athlete who might be worth developing on the practice squad.

Up next: Defensive line.


UserPostedImage
Dulak
15 years ago
Oline is the most interesting position for me this offseason - mainly because I feel we need alot of work here.

I really hope we improve our line and get some guys there that can do the job. I really like our choices and I'm eagerly awaiting to see how our guys play this next year.
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
Holy crap, paragraphs are a good thing.

Oline is definitely the biggest concern right now. Can the new guys step in and take of like Clifton and Tauscher did in 00'. Would be nice, can't wait for that group to put the same 5 guys on the field for more that 1/2 a season.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Holy crap, paragraphs are a good thing.

Oline is definitely the biggest concern right now. Can the new guys step in and take of like Clifton and Tauscher did in 00'. Would be nice, can't wait for that group to put the same 5 guys on the field for more that 1/2 a season.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Hope this helps.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
Chad Clifton---

Knees failed him. I guess they have both been 'scoped, and I didn't see the direct source, (does anyone have this?) but I did read that his " ? knees/he is in the best shape in years?". Hell of a thing to be taking an 8 million dollar cap hit when there are question marks looming. It damn well better be bad knees (I believe it is) that caused him to get used in the latter part of the season. I don't put this on him, btw. Chad is a big-time gamer. I put it on the so-called depth behind him...or should I say, the lack of it.

Then we get to one of my favorite players to discuss (NOT)... Daryn Colledge. Daryn Colledge just got over-f333 rated again. Best lineman in 2008? He had some good games, he had some TERRIBLE games. "Move him to tackle, that's where he belongs." My ### he does. He can't play guard at a consistently high level, what the fuck makes anyone think he can play tackle? Oh, he can play tackle all right, just make sure it's in college, not the National #### football league.

I gotta quit now, I was gonna do the rest, but have worked myself into a froth. Sorry for the bad words, but they accurately reflect my perspective. More to come when BP drops. Sorry.

Colledge will get Aaron Rodgers killed. Sorry..gotta go... sorry...
Rockmolder
15 years ago
Well, if they do want Colledge to play RT, he'll slide in pretty easily. Or at least, he should.

Apart from the overload blitzes, we should have an easier time blocking the left side of the defense (Our right side), since most of the team have no good rusher lining up at the left side. Ofcourse we're facing teams like the Steelers, Cowboys and Ravens, but teams like the Lions, Vikings, Bengals, Bears and Seahawks have no great rushers coming off that side.

We should be able to see how he does in single coverage a lot more than in double coverage that way aswell.

As for Clifton, I certainly hope this his knees are ok. He's losing some speed and had to hold way to much for my liking last season. I hope this was mainly due to his knees. If so, he might be able to push a speed rusher around again.

Ofcourse, he is aging, so he'll never be as good as he once was, but still, he's far above average if he gets this sorted out.

EDIT: Btw, Foster-Dave, do you ever sleep? :blackeye:
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Well, if they do want Colledge to play RT, he'll slide in pretty easily. Or at least, he should.

Apart from the overload blitzes, we should have an easier time blocking the left side of the defense (Our right side), since most of the team have no good rusher lining up at the left side. Ofcourse we're facing teams like the Steelers, Cowboys and Ravens, but teams like the Lions, Vikings, Bengals, Bears and Seahawks have no great rushers coming off that side.

We should be able to see how he does in single coverage a lot more than in double coverage that way aswell.

As for Clifton, I certainly hope this his knees are ok. He's losing some speed and had to hold way to much for my liking last season. I hope this was mainly due to his knees. If so, he might be able to push a speed rusher around again.

Ofcourse, he is aging, so he'll never be as good as he once was, but still, he's far above average if he gets this sorted out.

EDIT: Btw, Foster-Dave, do you ever sleep? :blackeye:

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Marines never sleep. They wait until they are on leave and then they pass out.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
WPR wrote:

Marines never sleep. They wait until they are on leave and then they pass out.



lol.

Old habits die hard. Jarheads always sleep when they can. Absolutely the laziest pack of individuals you would ever meet, if given the opportunity. The bitch is "they" never let you. They being everyone else in this world except you as an individual jarhead.

Plus if I slept, someone might get a word in edge-wise. Not on my watch, they won't...LOL..that would also be another jarhead trait.

Truth be told I have been sick for a week. Some sort of infection. Too sick to sleep much. Too stubborn to go to doc. (imagine that, dfosterf is stubborn) Seems to be subsiding, though.
Tezzy
15 years ago
For me I'm always concerned about the left side of our line, no matter who is playing. So i did a quick comparison against what some pundits argue to be some of the better oline groups. All I compared were the combined stats of the LT and LG of the respected teams. What really catches my eye is the discipline of the left side of the Queens line. I don't know if the sacks are a by product of too many games with the sitting duck Gus in there, but the penalties alone make me jealous. That's that many less drives killed because of mental errors. I'm hoping in the near future the NFL agrees to start tracking pancake blocks as an official stat so we can get a better comparison of run blocking. A lot of tape to go through to really do that, though the summer is long, maybe I'll get to it 😛 In conclusion, yes I'm worried about the line, but here's to hoping no more musical chairs will allow the players to start playing and not have to think too much to remember where on the line they are that play.

UserPostedImage
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Dulak
15 years ago

For me I'm always concerned about the left side of our line, no matter who is playing. So i did a quick comparison against what some pundits argue to be some of the better oline groups. All I compared were the combined stats of the LT and LG of the respected teams. What really catches my eye is the discipline of the left side of the Queens line. I don't know if the sacks are a by product of too many games with the sitting duck Gus in there, but the penalties alone make me jealous. That's that many less drives killed because of mental errors. I'm hoping in the near future the NFL agrees to start tracking pancake blocks as an official stat so we can get a better comparison of run blocking. A lot of tape to go through to really do that, though the summer is long, maybe I'll get to it 😛 In conclusion, yes I'm worried about the line, but here's to hoping no more musical chairs will allow the players to start playing and not have to think too much to remember where on the line they are that play.

UserPostedImage

"Tezzy" wrote:



where do you get these stats? I'm curious about denvers and the titans stats last year
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (17h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.