Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Better start training in a meat locker or packing plant someplace.. get that body adjusted to the cold SoCal boy. :lol:

Some impact stuff here... ;)

Source... 

Packers rookie linebacker Clay Matthews said an interview today that he has not decided if he is going to a sue a Web site that posted an erroneous report saying he had tested positive for steroids at the NFL Combine in February.

"I don't know, to be honest," Matthews said on the Dan Patrick radio show today. "I'm just trying to focus on the football aspect and let my agent take care of it."

"I'm going to talk to my agent to see what we are going to do," Matthews said. "It's a guy sitting behind a computer that has his own Web site. So there is not much to take away except his site. But I'm sure his reputation has been damaged enough by this."

Matthews, who said he has never played a game in the snow, is going to wear jersey number 52.

No one in the Packers' organization has asked him to cut his long hair.

"Especially being on a team with A.J. Hawk with his long hair, I'm in good company," Matthews said. "I'm looking forward to it. It was funny, another rookie (on Wednesday) said I was looking like a wrestler."

If you want to get technical, Matthews said his name is Clay Matthews III, not Clay Matthews Jr. But if you call him Clay Matthews Jr., that's all right with him.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Dulak
15 years ago
I for one didnt like all the lying around the draft and combine. Made me pretty pissed. I think he should sue the guy just because other people will think they can get away with it and potentially ruin peoples futures.

Same thing with raji ...

And alot of sites say a annoymous source told them x ...

you ever see that movie based on a true story where 1/2 of the guys articles were made up (made up sources etc ...)

I think false accusations should have to be proven

GL to matthews here - hope I see him at the ROLB at least a couple downs per set.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Never played in the snow? Crap, we got a bust right thar! Oh well, at least it only cost us one extra pick.

Because we all know players who haven't played in snow before suck in the snow!

:P


I'm bored, give me a damn break.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Never played in the snow? Crap, we got a bust right thar! Oh well, at least it only cost us one extra pick.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Technically the right to draft Matthews cost us three picks. ;)

Yes.. I haven't let go of that yet. :lol:
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Never played in the snow? Crap, we got a bust right thar! Oh well, at least it only cost us one extra pick.

"pack93z" wrote:



Technically the right to draft Matthews cost us three picks. ;)

Yes.. I haven't let go of that yet. :lol:

"SlickVision" wrote:



No it didn't. We got two picks for our three picks. Simple math my friend, even I can do that one! 😛
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Never played in the snow? Crap, we got a bust right thar! Oh well, at least it only cost us one extra pick.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Technically the right to draft Matthews cost us three picks. ;)

Yes.. I haven't let go of that yet. :lol:

"pack93z" wrote:



No it didn't. We got two picks for our three picks. Simple math my friend, even I can do that one! :P

"SlickVision" wrote:



LOL.. yes in my haste.. forgot that 5th rounder.. still an expensive trade for us.

Maybe one day we will look back upon it and say, damn... what a stroke of brilliance alas a certain 1992 trade..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Oh hell no. Matthews will be good, not great. He'll make the Packers Hall of Fame a year or two after Hawk, that's the tops for them two though.


I bet your left leg on it!
UserPostedImage
Dulak
15 years ago

Never played in the snow? Crap, we got a bust right thar! Oh well, at least it only cost us one extra pick.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Technically the right to draft Matthews cost us three picks. ;)

Yes.. I haven't let go of that yet. :lol:

"pack93z" wrote:



No it didn't. We got two picks for our three picks. Simple math my friend, even I can do that one! :P

"SlickVision" wrote:



I would be more upset about all the picks we traded for matthews if our later picks were crap. But I really like the lang/meredith and quinn picks.
That I am willing to 'forgive' the cost of matthews (even if he doesnt turn out that great).
Rockmolder
15 years ago
Whenever you have the amount of young players we have, see a player that you targeted at pick 9 at pick 26 and have a willing trading partner, there's really no reason not to trade up. As steep as the cost was according to most of you, I'm very happy.

Anyway, having him at OLB with Greene coaching him is a recipe for success. If he can get some of that cuckoo mentality into the kid and make him run around as a fierce hitter (He's capable of doing anything with his athleticism) while being, as advertised, one of the best nickel and ST players, he'll have an amazing career.
zombieslayer
15 years ago

Whenever you have the amount of young players we have, see a player that you targeted at pick 9 at pick 26 and have a willing trading partner, there's really no reason not to trade up. As steep as the cost was according to most of you, I'm very happy.

Anyway, having him at OLB with Greene coaching him is a recipe for success. If he can get some of that cuckoo mentality into the kid and make him run around as a fierce hitter (He's capable of doing anything with his athleticism) while being, as advertised, one of the best nickel and ST players, he'll have an amazing career.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



What he said. :thumbright:

I don't think it was too steep at all. After doing some research, I strongly feel the right move was made.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (7m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (7m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (28m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.