wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
11 months ago

Another milestone date has come and gone as the NFL regular season approaches. For players, it can be one of the toughest days of the NFL calendar, as …

Continue Reading @ Eric Fischer 

Eric Fischer wrote:



I get what Fischer is trying to say but in the long run most of it doesn't matter.

1.He was concerned about a number of players. Merriweather and Hicks are back. They're on the PS. Was he really complaining about Newman? People couldn't wait to see him cut. He's now with the Bucs so it don't matter. Let's see if he makes it to the field or not this year.

2. Toure. Why? He wasn't good enough to make anyone's 53. He is only a PS player with the bares. Good luck.

3. If Clifford had stepped up and shown real progressive from year 1 to year 2, Pratt might still be with the Packers. They wouldn't of felt the need to trade for Willis. Prtt would have been given a chance to learn and develop as the Packers PS QB instead of ending up with the Bucs. Then again if the PS was the only option he may have taken Tampa anyway.

Also 3. He wrote this article before the PSs were complete and doesn't mention that GB picked up Narveson as their shiny new kicker.

4. The putting Dillard on the season ending IR surprised me. I thought since they had an additional IR designated to return spot before cutting to 53 they might have used it for him. If they only wanted to use one why not him instead of Ford? Interesting.

5. Looking at some of the other cuts why complain that the LB6 is more important that DE6? Welsh had a good training camp but they like Mosby better. I think I heard he is better on ST as well.
Also releasing Rochell and King apparently didn't hurt as they are both on the PS.
As for Ant Johnson, Gute feels Anderson's ST contribution is better than S6 even if he did get the courtesy nod and started the season as S2. The rookies showed he wasn't needed.

6. Finally I never felt that having a UDFA on the first 53 roster was a special thing. To me that only meant the Packers didn't have a player good enough to dislodge him. This year they do.




UserPostedImage
beast
11 months ago

I get what Fischer is trying to say but in the long run most of it doesn't matter.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



1. Yeah, an odd list of guys to complain about being released, I think all of them except Newman are available to be put on the PS. And fans were demanding that Newman got released.

And while certain fans absolutely loved Caleb Jones, he's currently not signed to any team, not even on a PS.


2. I have never understood the extra love that WR Toure gets. Nothing wrong with him, and nothing against him, but why fans seem to be extra interested in him, vs WR DeBose?

Heck, #2 is the same as #1, except the writer wanted to have an exclusive number for WR Toure, to break him apart from all the others. Why is Toure special enough to get his own number away from all his teammates?


3. Yeah the QB and K battles were not won... but everyone in them loss.

4. The article falsely claims that the Packers had the option to outright release RB Dillon, that is false. Teams can only out right release injured players during the off-season, and they can not do that during the preseason nor season.

The Packers true options with an injured player that isn't making the 53 man roster as follows.

IR/Keep or IR/Release

If you select the release option, then the injury player (depending on their veterans status) goes on Waivers and if no team claims them, then they revert back to the IR. Where the keep option, sends them straight to the IR. Either way, he ends up on the IR.

So what's the point of kicking Dillon while he's down with a release label that doesn't change anything? There is no upside for that in a player that has been with your team for years! Either way, the Packers and Dillon can either agree to an injury settlement, where Dillon will be released after the settlement, or they can disagree and Dillon can stay on the IR on the entire year. Unless you want to kick him while he's down, there is no reason to use the IR/release option.

I said there was no way the Packers would use all their return from IR before the season.

Though I am surprised they used one on DT Ford, maybe he showed better than I realized, as I thought he was going to be an easy release.


5. Now this is a great point, though it's true every year and for every team. You have to make some tough choices that might not be so clear.

Even teams that aren't considered so good, can have a number player claimed off their releases and the Packers have four released players on other teams 53 man roster now. So apparently other teams thought they were talented enough to make a 53 man roster. Are the Packers just that deep, or did the Packers make an error? Too soon to say, but usually the released players don't make the teams regret it, but once in a while they do.


6. Well, this must of happened after the article, but again the article is mistaken, as the Packers have (assuming he passes his physical and stays healthy), the Packers have rookie UDFA K Brayden Narveson on the roster for week 1.

Though even if they didn't, I would argue with saying the "Tradition in trouble"... as that's wrong, the Packers have the longest streak in the NFL and the consecutive year streak is at risk, but the tradition would still be extremely strong, even if it took only a year off.

I think it does say something that the Packers both do a good job scouting UDFAs and that they give UDFAs a fair shot at making the 53 man roster.

I do find it surprising that the year that the Packers broke their rule about not guaranteeing any part of the contract for UDFA, is the first year in this streak that none of their own UDFAs could make the roster.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
11 months ago




2. I have never understood the extra love that WR Toure gets. Nothing wrong with him, and nothing against him, but why fans seem to be extra interested in him, vs WR DeBose?

Heck, #2 is the same as #1, except the writer wanted to have an exclusive number for WR Toure, to break him apart from all the others. Why is Toure special enough to get his own number away from all his teammates?

6. Well, this must of happened after the article, but again the article is mistaken, as the Packers have (assuming he passes his physical and stays healthy), the Packers have rookie UDFA K Brayden Narveson on the roster for week 1.

Though even if they didn't, I would argue with saying the "Tradition in trouble"... as that's wrong, the Packers have the longest streak in the NFL and the consecutive year streak is at risk, but the tradition would still be extremely strong, even if it took only a year off.

I think it does say something that the Packers both do a good job scouting UDFAs and that they give UDFAs a fair shot at making the 53 man roster.

I do find it surprising that the year that the Packers broke their rule about not guaranteeing any part of the contract for UDFA, is the first year in this streak that none of their own UDFAs could make the roster.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Toure is like every other WR 7, 8 or 9. some fans fall in love with them every year. They swear the team can't get along without them. That it is a mistake to release them. And yet very few are even picked up by other teams. If they are it for the PS.

As for the UDFA's Uncle Teddy and Gute HAVE done a great job identifying them. My point is they typically are not very valuable. Roughly the same as a 6th or 7th round pick.
As of now DL Brenton Cox Jr. (FA-23) WR Malik Heath (FA-23) T Kadeem Telfort (FA-23) RB Emanuel Wilson (FA-23) are the only ones listed on the Packer's site as being "College FAs". K Brayden Narveson (W-24 TEN) is under the category of "Waiver/ Trades".

As for the draft picks there's LB Isaiah McDuffie (6b) T Rasheed Walker (7c) DL Karl Brooks (6a) CB Carrington Valentine (7a) T Travis Glover (6).

While they have acquired UDFAs they don't stick around very long and are typically 3rd string filler guys.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 months ago
I cannot recall ever being enamored with Toure.
UserPostedImage
greengold
10 months ago


I do find it surprising that the year that the Packers broke their rule about not guaranteeing any part of the contract for UDFA, is the first year in this streak that none of their own UDFAs could make the roster.

Originally Posted by: beast 


I started to say he made the practice squad. So he is getting paid and his salary is counting against the cap.

But then I realized that he's not under that contract the the Packers broke, so he probably did get that extra $100k. Unless it was worded extremely creatively.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (2h) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (2h) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (2h) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (2h) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (3h) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (3h) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (3h) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (3h) : *Friday*
dfosterf (3h) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (3h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (4h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (4h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (4h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (4h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (4h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (4h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (4h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (4h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (4h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (5h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (5h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (5h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (5h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (11h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.