As the Green Bay Packers navigate an off-season that could be crucial in determining whether this team builds off its surprising 2023 success and takes the next step, they must determine what to do with their 12 unrestricted free agents. Perhaps the biggest name on that list of 12, is that of running back, AJ Dillon.
Before he even took a snap in a Packers’ uniform, Dillon drew attention in training camp for the size of his quadriceps and received the nickname, “Quadzilla.” Drafted 62nd overall in the 2020 NFL draft, AJ Dillon wasn't exactly a celebrated pick at first by the Packers faithful. Some felt the Packers had just drafted a fullback in the 2nd round given Dillon's size and running style. Unfortunately, Dillon never really got the chance to prove himself early as he was slotted behind fellow running backs Aaron Jones and Jamaal Williams on the depth chart.
In the first seven games of his career, he only received 23 total carries of 97 yards total. Which if put into one game would be a pretty good outing, but spread out in seven games? Not so much. The next five games, Dillon spent on the COVID-19 list after testing positive for the virus but then three games later, Dillon had a huge breakout game where he showed his potential. He barreled through the Tennessee Titans defense for 124 yards on 21 carries and two touchdowns on a cold late December night in Green Bay. This was enough for the Packers to let Jamaal Williams walk in free agency later that offseason, landing Dillon at the #2 running back role behind Aaron Jones.
Dillon had a decent career as Jones' backup averaging about 728 yards and five touchdowns per season on the ground and another 200 or so yards through the air. But he never quite became that reliable running back that's desired of a second-round pick.
Looking to 2024
Aaron Jones has a hefty price tag next season, but Packers GM Brian Gutekunst has already stated he wants Jones back. Jones is the heart and soul of the offense, so his return is a no-brainer. But after Jones, with AJ Dillon's contract expiring, there are big question marks. Behind Jones on the depth chart sits rookie Emanuel Wilson and 3rd year-back, Patrick Taylor. Both have shown some good spurts but nothing to suggest the Packers could make them Jones' backup in 2024.
So, what to do?
I don't think there's a question that the Packers will likely draft a running back in the first three rounds. Holding five picks in the first 80 selections, one of them is bound to be used on a running back. Blake Corum, Marshawn Lloyd, and Jonathan Brooks could be some good options in the first three rounds. After that, Wisconsin's Braelon Allen is a name Packer fans would love to hear called when Green Bay is on the clock. Allen kind of fits the mold of AJ Dillon a bit being a big running back that operates through his size and strength. If the Packers are looking to replace Dillon, Allen could be an intriguing option regardless of the Badger-ties. But, I think if the Packers are going to draft a running back high, they need to find one to replace Aaron Jones, not AJ Dillon.
Even though Aaron Jones seems to be still at the top of his game, he's entering his 8th season in 2024. That is flirting very closely with the Grim Reaper when it comes to starting running back shelf-life. Jones will be back in 2024, but what about after? His price tag could remain hefty regardless of restructuring, and pretty soon something will have to give. At 5'8 210 lbs Blake Corum is very close to being Aaron Jones in terms of size and speed. Marshawn Lloyd also matches those measurements and could be an intriguing option as well. Corum, of course, has the stat lines you dream about for a back, while Lloyd is also a pretty decent threat through the air which Matt LaFleur values in a running back.
But are they the sure number 2?
If the Packers had low to average expectations going into 2024, I would say a rookie 3rd/4th round pick behind Aaron Jones would be just fine. But with the Packers possibly looking at another good playoff run, I'd maybe want a veteran back at the ready just in case the rookie has a hard time transitioning. Almost like how the Packers handled AJ Dillon. He had Jones and Williams in front of him so he could get acclimated. I could see history repeating itself with there being that other veteran back just in case.
So, why shouldn't it be AJ Dillon?
Bring him back
Saturday I ran a little poll on Twitter/X asking between Darnell Savage, Keisean Nixon, AJ Dillon, and Jon Runyan Jr, who you would want to see the Packers resign the most. I received 61 votes in the allotted time and 54% voted for Keisean Nixon, 26% for Savage, 13% for Dillon, and 7% for Runyan. Honestly, given Dillon's popularity over the other four, I was quite surprised he was third. But it seems like many are okay with letting him walk if it comes down to it.
What that poll doesn't ask though is whether or not they'd accept the others being resigned. But even on that note, Dillon still isn't highly favored given his inability to truly "woo" the fanbase on the field. But, here's the thing, Dillon bleeds Wisconsin and Green and Gold off the field. AJ Dillon's wife, Gabrielle is a Green Bay native, and Dillon has been given another nickname over time which is the "Mayor of Door County." I think there's a good chance if given the opportunity, AJ would resign with the Packers. So, if you're going to bring in a veteran running back as an insurance policy alongside a rookie behind Aaron Jones, why wouldn't you just bring back a running back that's been on your roster?
I get it. AJ Dillon has produced the amount that's expected of a high pick. He's also never going to be a feature back unless somehow he greatly improves. But if I'm the Packers, and I have Aaron Jones in the waning years of his career, and a rookie that may still be a deer in the headlights, I'd want to sign AJ Dillon to at least a one-year deal. After that year, it can be decided, okay, is the rookie ready? Or, is Jones going to cut it for another year? Regardless, I think it would be nice to still have AJ Dillon ready in the event he's needed in 2024.
Continue Reading @ CheeseheadTV
CheeseheadTV wrote: