While I think the Packers will try to establish the run. (The same thing they say they are going to do every year.) The number of rushes from scrimmage isn't going to be THAT significantly different. Last year the 15th and 16th teams with the most passes were Rams and Broncos at 58%. The Packers were 18th at 56%. The team that ran the ball the most was Chicago at 56%. With Fields as their QB it's understandable why the bares didn't want to throw the ball. 
GB with Love as their QB isn't going to be that shy when it comes to passing. They may run a little more but it isn't going to be a 10% swing. It will be 2 or 3% at most. If for no other reason than the OL. Green Bays line is pretty decent against the pass but pretty poor when it comes to run blocking.



 

---

I think a major determinate of the run/pass ratio will be how well our (new) TEs can block. 

If they block well, I think we will see more runs than passes, which would be terrific.  If we want to be a team that wins in December, January and February we need to be able to run the ball consistently and effectively especially on 3rd downs.

---

Yeah looks like LaFleaur's Packers have passed the ball about 56.5% to 58.5% of the time. Looks like NFL average is about 58.75%

The Packers might run more, but I'm thinking they pass it at least 55% of the time. Of course, short quick passes are also a part of the run game but get counted as passes.

And a large part of the wide zone scheme is getting the RBs in one on one situations and getting them the ball, on swing passes or others, and I really don't remember seeing the Packers do that much with Rodgers at QB. Yes they targeted the RBs at times down the field, but not in short passes.

---