Mucky Tundra
2 years ago


During a span of sixty-five years, beginning in 1936, the Green Bay Packers never lost a home playoff game at City Stadium, which was rebuilt in 1956, and renamed Lambeau Field in 1965.    ESPN sports anchor Chris Berman took to referring to the venue as “the frozen tundra”, and the nickname stuck. 


Any playoff game the Packers hosted at Lambeau was considered a sure victory.  Nobody wanted to come up in the cold and play the Pack in January.  That was especially true of the warm weather teams from the south and the west.  Lambeau was the most feared home field advantage in all of pro football, perhaps in all of sports. 


The mystique ended in 2002 when quarterback Michael Vick and the Atlanta Falcons came to Lambeau and thoroughly whipped the Packers 27-7 in the wild card round.  Since then, Green Bay has gone just 7-7 in the post season on their home turf.  The last two defeats were particularly disheartening because, in both cases, the general consensus was the Packers had the better team.  Following the 2020 season, Tom Brady and the Tampa Bay Bucs made the cross country trip to northeastern Wisconsin and beat the Packers 31-26 in the NFC championship game.  After the 2021 season, the San Francisco 49ers knocked the green and gold out of the playoffs at Lambeau with a 13-10 upset. 


Green Bay went 7-1 at home during the 2019 and 2020 seasons.  In 2021 they were a perfect 8-0 in the friendly confines.  But this past season, the home record slipped to 5-3.  That doesn’t include the loss to the New York Giants, which was a home game but was played in London.   


It’s not like Green Bay lost those games to top of the league juggernauts.  They were beaten at home by the Jets, the Titans and the Lions.  None of those teams made the playoffs.  The Jets and Titans actually finished with worse records than the Packers.  The Lions game was, in effect, a playoff game, and represented yet another failure in the clutch in front of the home crowd. 


What has happened to Green Bay’s home field advantage?  We all have our own theories.  Here’s mine.  I believe the decline was inevitable considering the game’s continuing emphasis on the pass.  The NFL wants wide open, high scoring games, with big, exciting pass plays.  They have made it harder to defend the pass with numerous rule changes protecting quarterbacks and receivers.   


Understanding this, the Green Bay front office and coaching staff have tried to gradually assemble a dynamic offense emphasizing speed and athleticism.  And for the most part, they’ve been successful.  Last year notwithstanding, the Packers have had one of the most dynamic offenses in the league in recent seasons.  There was also a sense of not wasting the career of a Hall of Fame caliber passer.  Yes, the Packers have two good running backs, but the team has never seemed to commit to winning by running the ball.  Like most other teams, they run to set up the pass. 


However, that brand of team often comes at the expense of physicality and toughness, qualities that really become necessary when the weather turns cold.  How many times have you heard the Packers accused of being “soft” in recent years?  How many games has it seemed as though they are getting pushed around by opponents that are not as talented as them?  In short, Green Bay, which plays in the coldest venue in the NFL, may have built a team that is ill-suited for cold weather.  


And then there are the fans.  I am only going by the audio that I hear on my television, which can be deceptive.  You readers who have actually attended games at Lambeau recently can correct me if I’m off base.  But it seems to me that the amplitude of the cheering when an opponent does something positive is getting louder and louder.  I’ve even heard substantial noise from opposing fans when Green Bay lines up to call signals on offense.  This seems to indicate the number of enemy fans in the stadium has significantly increased.   


We’ve all seen Matt LaFleur flapping his arms like a wounded condor on the sideline, trying to elicit more noise from the home crowd.  Frankly, it’s kind of embarrassing that our own coach feels he has to do that.  I know from covering the team home and away for four years, that It’s always been a kind of unspoken sentiment among players and coaches that Packer fans aren’t as loud as fans in some other venues, particularly the Milwaukee crowd.   


Part of that has nothing to do with team spirit. For one thing, I also know from experience that it’s not easy to scream and shout when temperatures are below freezing, your face is numb, and you’re wearing parkas and gloves.  And  I empathize with fans who are dealing with the rising cost of season tickets.  I get that they need to sell some of the games off to be able to afford the package.  I don’t know how much control the fan has over whom those seats get sold to.  But it would probably help if they weren’t sold to opposing team supporters.  


Really though, I’m not sure how much crowd noise actually affects a game.  It’s probably overrated.  The Packers just need to find a way to reestablish Lambeau Field as their property.  Holding serve at home this coming season will be critical to their success.  In addition to their NFC North rivals, Green Bay plays the Saints, Rams, Chargers, Chiefs and Bucs at home.  To stay in playoff contention, they likely can’t afford to lose more than one of those games. 


The frozen tundra must rise again.  Something tells me that it will. 



Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.


Continue Reading @ CheeseheadTV 

CheeseheadTV wrote:



I think the article misses something: the games move slower thanks to tv timeouts, reviews initiated by coaches etc. Throw in parity from salary cap rules, it makes teams far more even and with rules favoring passing (with big gains from either plays or penalties), it makes it harder for teams to build up lead and maintain them with game flow/momentum and crowd noise. 
Under Construction!
beast
2 years ago

I think the article misses something: the games move slower thanks to tv timeouts, reviews initiated by coaches etc. Throw in parity from salary cap rules, it makes teams far more even and with rules favoring passing (with big gains from either plays or penalties), it makes it harder for teams to build up lead and maintain them with game flow/momentum and crowd noise. 

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 



I think the writer is also missing something, an intelligent argument. While the things he noticed are correct, what's his solution to fixing these issues?

Simply focus on the run game more? ... don't you think they and the other 31 ones teams are attempting to improve their running game? He's just saying here is the problem, they should fix it ... well no shit! I'm sure none of the Packers teams wanted to lose at home.


All this being said,  what do you want to do about it?Much some huge move? As we agreed on in shout

Seems like Gute's best moves were the ones that he hasn't been able to execute... and Bears beat them out on a couple of those, Claypool, OLB Mack, etc

beast wrote:


beast I noticed that too

The irony is that fans say he's not aggressive enough to do what's necessary but the aggressive moves he wanted to make would be a disaster

Mucky Tundra wrote:


And the fact of the matter is, scouts are not prefect and certain teams have strengths I'm selecting certain positions and weakness is other areas.

And I think it's far to question if one of the Packers weak areas of selecting players might be OL.

A lot of people want to talk about how many #1 picks are on the defense, but Gute has a pattern of Round 1 on defense but then rounds 2, 3 and often round 4 on offense. Looks at how much value has been put into OL and how little we have gotten out of it so far.

Othere than maybe Jenkins (whom the Packers had his former offensive coordinator on staff as QB coach), Runyan and MAYBE just MAYBE Tom all of Gute's OL picks have so far under preformed their draft status and a lot of them have a lot better OL player drafted behind them playing on the Chiefs, Patriots or Bears.


So his seeming idea of let's just improve here is ridiculous and lazy writing, because they absolutely have been trying. So instead of suggestions maybe we should get better at the run game, how about put a little work into it, and say let's get OL scouting reports and improve our OL selections.

Also, as for drafting OL, Gute certainly seems to have a strict type, 6'4" - 6'6" must be from SEC, Big 10 or Pac 12 (Tom is the only exception, being from the ACC). Which of course for OTs, but it's a bit surprising all the interior guys as well have that height and not a single small school guy.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago

I think the writer is also missing something, an intelligent argument. While the things he noticed are correct, what's his solution to fixing these issues?

Simply focus on the run game more? ... don't you think they and the other 31 ones teams are attempting to improve their running game? He's just saying here is the problem, they should fix it ... well no shit! I'm sure none of the Packers teams wanted to lose at home.


All this being said,  what do you want to do about it?Much some huge move? As we agreed on in shout


And the fact of the matter is, scouts are not prefect and certain teams have strengths I'm selecting certain positions and weakness is other areas.

And I think it's far to question if one of the Packers weak areas of selecting players might be OL.

A lot of people want to talk about how many #1 picks are on the defense, but Gute has a pattern of Round 1 on defense but then rounds 2, 3 and often round 4 on offense. Looks at how much value has been put into OL and how little we have gotten out of it so far.

Othere than maybe Jenkins (whom the Packers had his former offensive coordinator on staff as QB coach), Runyan and MAYBE just MAYBE Tom all of Gute's OL picks have so far under preformed their draft status and a lot of them have a lot better OL player drafted behind them playing on the Chiefs, Patriots or Bears.


So his seeming idea of let's just improve here is ridiculous and lazy writing, because they absolutely have been trying. So instead of suggestions maybe we should get better at the run game, how about put a little work into it, and say let's get OL scouting reports and improve our OL selections.

Also, as for drafting OL, Gute certainly seems to have a strict type, 6'4" - 6'6" must be from SEC, Big 10 or Pac 12 (Tom is the only exception, being from the ACC). Which of course for OTs, but it's a bit surprising all the interior guys as well have that height and not a single small school guy.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I think it's more of a rah rah article than a logical argumentation piece.

Man I hated Vick and Reeves for that. I was aware of our playoff home record. Nowadays I blame Sherman and Rosseley for being people who were not smart.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
2 years ago

I think it's more of a rah rah article than a logical argumentation piece.

Man I hated Vick and Reeves for that. I was aware of our playoff home record. Nowadays I blame Sherman and Rosseley for being people who were not smart.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



If memory serves me correctly, I thought Vick would beat us, simply from the standpoint our defense was surprisingly injured the week going into the game and he's hard to catch.

KGB had Vick cornered a couple of times between him and the sideline and he missed the tackles and Vick took a good size loss into a pretty good gain.
UserPostedImage
2 years ago

However, that brand of team often comes at the expense of physicality and toughness, qualities that really become necessary when the weather turns cold.  How many times have you heard the Packers accused of being “soft” in recent years?  How many games has it seemed as though they are getting pushed around by opponents that are not as talented as them?  In short, Green Bay, which plays in the coldest venue in the NFL, may have built a team that is ill-suited for cold weather.  

I thought this was the best point in the article.  Many of us have the lamented the inability to consistantly run the ball successfully on 3rd (and 4th) and less than 2 yards.  We don't seem to get guys with the 'road grader' ability on the Offensive Line.
Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

I thought this was the best point in the article.  Many of us have the lamented the inability to consistantly run the ball successfully on 3rd (and 4th) and less than 2 yards.  We don't seem to get guys with the 'road grader' ability on the Offensive Line.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



How much do you factor that the QB would see the defense give the offense a good look and then rather than running on 3rd and short, or passing it to a guy in the flat, or quick hitch route over the middle to move the chains the ball gets aired out 15+ yards down the field?

It's my belief we could have had Christian Okoye the last 10 years and there wouldn't be an increase in rushing attempts on 3rd and short.
UserPostedImage
2 years ago

How much do you factor that the QB would see the defense give the offense a good look and then rather than running on 3rd and short, or passing it to a guy in the flat, or quick hitch route over the middle to move the chains the ball gets aired out 15+ yards down the field?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Only to the extent he, the OC, and the Head Coach all  knew the offensive line got very little movement so they would naturally be predisposed to look to pass first.

It's my belief we could have had Christian Okoye the last 10 years and there wouldn't be an increase in rushing attempts on 3rd and short.

That's because its not as much about the RB, as it is about the 5 guys plus the TE moving bodies off the ball ala the Eagles this year.
Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Only to the extent he, the OC, and the Head Coach all  knew the offensive line got very little movement so they would naturally be predisposed to look to pass first.
That's because its not as much about the RB, as it is about the 5 guys plus the TE moving bodies off the ball ala the Eagles this year.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



Packers OL is pretty decent vs the run. Maybe defenses figured Rodgers would take a shot so they gave him the look they knew he wanted to bait him into it? 🤔
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago

Packers OL is pretty decent vs the run. Maybe defenses figured Rodgers would take a shot so they gave him the look they knew he wanted to bait him into it? 🤔

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I definitely believed that happened at times, defenses would give Rodgers defending the run looks, knowing if it was a run, he'd switch it to a pass and then out of that defensive run look they would pin their ears back and pass rush hard out of the false look. At least that what seemed to happen at times to me.

Of course, I believe it was former Packers Mike Wahle whom broke down Tom and Nijman video and pointed out that you can 100% tell if it's a run or pass call, just by their stances. With their feet being vertical if it's a pass and horizontal if it's a run. If Packers want to get better at disguising their looks, especially for play action that this wide zone is known for but the Packers haven't used a lot of lately, they need to either fix that by going to a single stance, or use the wrong stance on propose when it's play action, or when you want to fake the opponent out.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

I definitely believed that happened at times, defenses would give Rodgers defending the run looks, knowing if it was a run, he'd switch it to a pass and then out of that defensive run look they would pin their ears back and pass rush hard out of the false look. At least that what seemed to happen at times to me.

Of course, I believe it was former Packers Mike Wahle whom broke down Tom and Nijman video and pointed out that you can 100% tell if it's a run or pass call, just by their stances. With their feet being vertical if it's a pass and horizontal if it's a run. If Packers want to get better at disguising their looks, especially for play action that this wide zone is known for but the Packers haven't used a lot of lately, they need to either fix that by going to a single stance, or use the wrong stance on propose when it's play action, or when you want to fake the opponent out.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I've been using similar tells for years to know if it's run or pass. It's not a Packers thing, it's an OL thing. 😁
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (5h) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (6h) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (6h) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (6h) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (6h) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (7h) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (7h) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (7h) : *years
Mucky Tundra (7h) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (7h) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (7h) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (7h) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (7h) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (7h) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (8h) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (10h) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (10h) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (11h) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

22h / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.