Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
I have noticed with all the political ads, that the only thing the democrats are hanging their hats on is abortion.
Acting like how HORRIBLE the republicans are for trying to protect innocent unborn children. And as far as in the case of rape or incest, it should be okay to take the life of the child. How about we kill the rapist? Or the male that raped a relative?
While Wisconsin's current governor is letting violent offenders out on the street early.
I heard Evers say all the great things he is going to do if reelected. Uh, why didn't he do those things during the last four years? Why should anyone believe he's going to suddenly do good things?
To me, abortion shouldn't be used as contraception. Or out of convenience.
Honesty, if abortion was ONLY used in cases of rape or incest, you'd get rid of 99% of abortions. But abortion is big business. So that's a big reason why they want to keep it legal.
Just my opinion of course.
I know there are people here that will agree with me, but most likely won't speak up for fear of attack.
But to me, if you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.
If you believe in the Bible, you know that God said that John the Baptist jumped for joy in his mother's belly when he heard Jesus was coming. God knew us while we were not yet born.

UserPostedImage
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
Here's another point to consider.
If a man pushes a pregnant woman down a flight of stairs, and she loses the unborn baby, why is the man charged with murder?
Yet if a woman chooses to kill the fetus, it's acceptable?
My point is, either unborn children are human babies, or they are not.
Who makes the "choice" shouldn't matter.
Either it's murder or it's not.
And if that is what your political side is the main thing they are using to try to sway voters, that seems mighty weak to me. There's a lot more wrong that should be targeted then that.

Ron Johnson (republican) has been attacked for making money with business with China. Yet JOE BIDEN gets a free pass for his and his son Hunter has received for their sketchy deals with China. Johnson has been on the up and up with his LEGAL
business dealings.
Again, my opinion.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
2 years ago
Abortion rights is possibly the most intractable moral issue we as a society face, and the price being paid with regards to who gets elected and what they do once elected is a tragedy for our nation, abortion rights being amongst the least of those consequences, imo The polarization between the powers in the parties is so great that any crack that can be utilized will be manipulated and exaggerated, spun, etc., largely dependent upon the polls that day, week month. There is a pretty big chasm on this issue, at least as expressed and/or manipulated. An abortion right may be morally repugnant to so many, but it might be a price to pay for living in an ostensibly free society. Brutal question, but for me, I remind myself that the job of God is taken.
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
When unborn children are considered expendable, how much lower morally can this country go? Why do you think the crime rate has gotten so bad over the last 50 years? When human life itself has no value, how can they expect the moral compass of this country to go up? You are teaching people that you can do what you want (have as much sex with however many people as you want) with no consequences. Get pregnant? Just flush the child away! You don't have to raise the child. Kill it, and go onto the next "partner".
And we wonder why there are school shootings. All the "YOU are SPECIAL!" YOU MATTER crap they are teaching kids. How about "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". Again, when killing babies doesn't matter, you can do expect these kinds of things.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
2 years ago
Honestly, Alan, we get it.
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Why do you think the crime rate has gotten so bad over the last 50 years?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


I would suspect part of it is because kids are having kids and because both parents are expected to be working to make due. Therefore, we don't have mom raising the kids all day, they are instead at child care through age five. Studies have shown our personalities are all but developed by age five.

When you have people having kids who are too young to learn how to adult themselves, I suspect that would contribute to some people growing up without morals, accountability and respect for others as well as a lack of self-awareness.

Here are some numbers about crime rate.
https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm 
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

I would suspect part of it is because kids are having kids and because both parents are expected to be working to make due. Therefore, we don't have mom raising the kids all day, they are instead at child care through age five. Studies have shown our personalities are all but developed by age five.

When you have people having kids who are too young to learn how to adult themselves, I suspect that would contribute to some people growing up without morals, accountability and respect for others as well as a lack of self-awareness.

Here are some numbers about crime rate.
https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I'm sure that's also part if the problem. 2 parent families are rare today. So add that with what I previously said is a recipe for disaster. My parents taught me to respect authority, and to be responsible for my actions.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
2 years ago
Major props for bringing your point of view, Alan. Major props to Kevin for letting the conversation flow. A lot of cowardice from most. I'm not going deep, but for some small examples... Does no one question why you cannot comment at all on CNN or MSNBC while concurrently calling FOX News "faux news" where you can? This raises no intellectual curiosity? There are a myriad of things we seem to take for granted as consumers of information I find bothersome. To me, it is all so profoundly leftist that when Alan opts to whip out his views, I find it courageous. And dhaze, go ahead and wear your cheesehead at your Trump rally, you nut! Lol
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
Dave, thank you for the compliment!

I don't give me views to try to be a jerk. I do it because some people don't even think of some of these things. I know it opens me up to attack. These things are very important to me. So I put myself out there.
If it makes even one person think about it, then it's worth taking a chance at getting my toes stepped on.
UserPostedImage
earthquake
2 years ago

I would suspect part of it is because kids are having kids and because both parents are expected to be working to make due. Therefore, we don't have mom raising the kids all day, they are instead at child care through age five. Studies have shown our personalities are all but developed by age five.

When you have people having kids who are too young to learn how to adult themselves, I suspect that would contribute to some people growing up without morals, accountability and respect for others as well as a lack of self-awareness.

Here are some numbers about crime rate.
https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Kevin makes some great points here. Children who grow up in families who are ill-equipped to raise them are much more likely to be involved in crime.

When we look at the numbers, crime rates have halved since peaking in the early 1990s and are lower than they were in the 1970s.

You have to go back to the 1960s to see years in which per-capita crime rates were lower than they have been in the last 10 years. And 1960s crime figures are problematic because if you look at murders, they were committed at a similar rate compared to modern times, however, the rate of reported rape was much lower in the 60's. Are we becoming a society of crazed rapists? Most likely not, it's simply much more common for rapes to be reported, as well as domestic violence and other crimes against women that were historically underreported due to fear of retribution, stigmatization, etc. And in the last few years rapes against men have been included in the statistics, resulting in a notable jump in those figures.

https://law.stanford.edu/publications/the-impact-of-legalized-abortion-on-crime-over-the-last-two-decades/  - the summary:


Donohue and Levitt (2001) presented evidence that the legalization of abortion in the early 1970s played an important role in the crime drop of the 1990s. That paper concluded with a strong out-of-sample prediction regarding the next two decades: “When a steady state is reached roughly twenty years from now, the impact of abortion will be roughly twice as great as the impact felt so far. Our results suggest that all else equal, legalized abortion will account for persistent declines of 1% a year in crime over the next two decades.” Estimating parallel specifications to the original paper, but using the seventeen years of data generated after that paper was written, we find strong support for the prediction and the broad hypothesis, while illuminating some previously unrecognized patterns of crime and arrests. We estimate that overall crime fell 17.5% from 1998 to 2014 due to legalized abortion— a decline of 1% per year. From 1991 to 2014, the violent and property crime rates each fell by 50%. Legalized abortion is estimated to have reduced violent crime by 47% and property crime by 33% over this period, and thus can explain most of the observed crime decline.



There are valid reasons to be against abortion but concerns over the rate of crime is not one of them. An outright ban on abortion would almost certainly result in increased rates of crime.



Here is my more general take on abortion:

It should be up to the woman, their family, and their doctor to assess the situation and make the decision.

In more extreme cases like incest and rape, requiring women to go through the trauma of not only being raped but carrying their rapist's baby to term and the life-long psychological side effects that will have on them is simply unconscionable in my view. Doubly so in cases involving children.

There are many cases where going through with a birth has a high likelihood of killing either or both the mother and child, and in these cases, it should be considered on an individual basis, and is not something an out-of-touch politician should be deciding.

In cases where there are bans on abortion, there need to be exceptions for rape, incest, and situations that pose a significant threat to the lives of mother and child.

This idea that abortion is used as a form of casual contraception is nothing more than a fantasy. Chances are someone you love has gone through an abortion and the very last thing it was was casual, easy, or poorly considered. In all likelihood, it was an extremely difficult and heart-wrenching decision to make.

At the end of the day, abortion is going to happen regardless of what the laws say so it should be performed by medical professionals and should be as safe as possible.
blank
Fan Shout
beast (12m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (13m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (35m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (44m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (1h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (5h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (5h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (5h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (5h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (5h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (5h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (5h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (5h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (6h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (6h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (9h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (19h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.